United

Taylor Swift

Impact

Axie Infinity

Two artists have sued the United States securities regulator seeking answers on whether nonfungible tokens fall under the commission’s authority.
Attorneys representing the plaintiffs — law professor and filmmaker Brian Frye and songwriter Jonathon Mann — sought clarification on which acts could trigger US securities laws when creating and <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/learn/what-are-nfts-and-why-are-they-revolutionizing-the-art-world" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">selling NFT art.</a>
Attorneys have asked whether artists need to “register” their <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/learn/how-to-create-an-nft" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">NFT art</a> before <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/nfts-lowest-monthly-sales-volume" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">selling it to the public</a> and whether they must make public disclosures about the “risks” of buying their art, the July 29 court filing <a href="https://www.morrisoncohen.com/siteFiles/Services/MannFryevSEC.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">shows.</a>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
 Proud to represent my client and friend Jonathan Mann <a href="https://twitter.com/songadaymann?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">@songadaymann</a> in his brave and unfortunately necessary lawsuit against the SEC. Art is not a security, and musicians working in a digital medium should not have to hire expensive securities lawyers just to release music. <a href="https://t.co/FBYL9FZZfG" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://t.co/FBYL9FZZfG</a>— Jason Gottlieb (@ohaiom) <a href="https://twitter.com/ohaiom/status/1817960459339026448?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">July 29, 2024</a>
</blockquote>
Frye and Mann’s attorneys used Taylor Swift concert tickets as an example, arguing it would be absurd for the <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/learn/the-sec-vs-ripple-lawsuit-everything-you-need-to-know" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Securities and Exchange Commission</a> to class NFTs as securities.
Swift sells concert tickets which are sold on the secondary market and she makes statements to promote those events — but it would be “utterly nonsensical” for the SEC to treat Swift tickets or collectibles as securities, the attorney’s argued.
<blockquote>
 “While Jonathan Mann and Brian Frye differ from Taylor Swift in many ways, in the context of this lawsuit, they are in exactly the same position. They are artists, and they want to create and sell their digital art, without the SEC investigating them or filing a lawsuit.”
</blockquote>
Related: <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/nfts-comeback-predicted-web3-experts-2024" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">NFTs poised for comeback despite sales drop say execs</a>
The lawsuit requests declaratory and injunctive relief against “unlawful enforcement actions” from the SEC on NFT projects launched by Frye and Mann.
The <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-charges-podcaster-first-unregistered-securities-sales-claim-against-nft-offering" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">SEC brought its first NFT case</a> against YouTube channel and podcast Impact Theory last August — claiming it encouraged potential investors to view the purchase of Founders Key NFTs as an investment and that investors could expect to profit from those purchases.
But Frye and Mann’s lawyers strongly disagreed with the SEC’s allegations: “Imagine if the SEC found that Taylor Swift songs or collectibles were securities (or were securities if merely released in NFT form), and ordered them to be destroyed.”
<blockquote>
 “It sounds far-fetched. But that is exactly what has happened to Impact Theory and SC2.”
</blockquote>
“The SEC’s approach threatens the livelihoods of artists and creators that are simply experimenting with a novel, fast-growing technology or have chosen it as their preferred medium," the lawyers stressed.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
 Wow. We have reached the point where the SEC’s application of securities laws is so arbitrary and unlawful that *artists* are compelled to sue the SEC directly in order to protect their livelihoods. The SEC is broken. (And fwiw I have thoroughly enjoyed many of these songs!) <a href="https://t.co/F6mfq2LJ6g" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://t.co/F6mfq2LJ6g</a>— Katherine Minarik (@MinarikLaw) <a href="https://twitter.com/MinarikLaw/status/1817975525870289177?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">July 29, 2024</a>
</blockquote>
Magazine:<a href="https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/socialfi-gaming-revenue-sky-mavis-discord-metarun-review-web3-gamer/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"> SocialFi boosts game revenue, Axie Infinity creator wants to ditch Discord: Web3 Gamer</a>

Artists sue SEC over confusing security status of NFTs

Cointelegraph

Các bài viết khác được xuất bản trên 29 thg 7, 2024

Binance's First Airdrop Portal Project: What is Banana Gun?

NFT Sales Reach Lowest Monthly Volume Since November 2023

Ripple News: XRP Could Skyrocket to $1,000 if Used for 10% of SWIFT Payments, Says Analyst

Ethereum ETFs Hit Wall Street: Strong Start Derailed by $341M Outflows

Bitcoin Leads a Significant Surge in the Cryptocurrency Market

Ethereum Plummets 8.5% Following ETF Outflows: Analyzing the Market Reaction

Tham gia bản tin miễn phí của chúng tôi để cập nhật tin tức về tiền điện tử hàng ngày!