Deep Dive
1. Founder Exit Sparks Major Sell-Off (10 April 2026)
Overview: On April 10, Sam Dare, founder of major subnet operator Covenant AI, announced a full exit from the Bittensor ecosystem, accusing Bittensor founder Jacob Steeves of "decentralization theatre." Following the announcement, Dare allegedly sold a large amount of subnet alpha tokens—community reports suggest 37,000 TAO worth around $10 million. This triggered a cascade: τemplar's price fell 63% in 24 hours, and nearly $10 million in TAO long positions were liquidated. Steeves denied the allegations, stating his own sales were minimal and that he cannot unilaterally control subnet emissions.
What this means: This is bearish for τemplar in the short term because it creates significant sell-side pressure, destroys holder trust, and leaves its primary subnet (SN3) without an active development team. However, it has prompted a proposed governance upgrade, with Steeves announcing a new lock-based subnet ownership model to better align team incentives. (The Defiant)
2. Historic Decentralized AI Model Launched (10 March 2026)
Overview: In early March, the τemplar team completed and deployed Covenant-72B, a 72-billion-parameter large language model, on Bittensor's Subnet 3. This was hailed as the largest decentralized LLM pre-training run in history, involving over 70 contributors using commodity hardware. The model achieved a competitive score of 67.1 on the MMLU benchmark. The operational launch was a major utility milestone for the Bittensor network, directly increasing demand for TAO staking and validator services on SN3.
What this means: This was profoundly bullish for τemplar, as the successful deployment validated its core utility and catalyzed a 194% token rally within days. It demonstrated that high-performance, decentralized AI is feasible on Bittensor, attracting institutional interest and setting a new standard for the subnet ecosystem. (BlockBeats)
Conclusion
τemplar's narrative has rapidly pivoted from a showcase of decentralized AI's potential to a stress test of its governance and founder dependency. The key question now is whether the proposed lock-based ownership mechanics can successfully attract a new team to revive SN3 and restore holder confidence.