Deep Dive
1. Helium Mainnet Upgrade (11 January 2026)
Overview: This was a protocol-level upgrade that introduced native support for 128-bit and 256-bit operations. For everyday users, it means the network can process confidential transactions and computations more swiftly and dependably without any required action on their part.
The upgrade strengthens the foundational infrastructure for key use cases like private DeFi and real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. By improving the core performance of its Garbled Circuits-based privacy layer, COTI aims to provide better tooling for developers building confidential applications.
What this means: This is bullish for $COTI because it directly enhances the network's core value proposition: fast and reliable privacy. A more capable infrastructure can attract more developers and institutional projects, potentially increasing network usage and demand for the COTI token over time.
(TradingView News)
2. V2 Mainnet Protocol Refinements (17 September 2025)
Overview: This scheduled upgrade applied refinements to the COTI V2 chain, preparing it for an October hard fork. It delivered fixes and stability improvements, ensuring user funds remained secure during the brief maintenance window.
The update deployed Version 1.1.4, which was audited by security firm Hacken. It targeted the network's multiparty computation (MPC) and gcEVM components—core parts of its privacy engine—after successful testing on the testnet.
What this means: This is neutral to bullish for $COTI. While it doesn't add new features, it crucially maintains network security and operational stability. Reliable, bug-free operation is essential for building trust with developers and users, forming a solid foundation for future growth.
(Yahoo Finance)
Conclusion
COTI's development trajectory is firmly focused on hardening and optimizing its unique privacy layer, transitioning from major launches to essential performance and reliability upgrades. Will this refined infrastructure be enough to capture significant developer mindshare in the competitive programmable privacy sector?