Latest Zilliqa (ZIL) News Update

Deep Dive

1. @zilliqa: Staking Migration Milestone Bullish

“60% of staked ZIL (2.4B tokens) moved to new portal – voting for 1.3s blocks + EVM compatibility”
– @zilliqa (458K followers · 12.1K impressions · 2025-08-11 11:57 UTC)
View original post
What this means: Bullish for ZIL because large-scale migration signals community confidence in Zilliqa 2.0’s technical upgrades, which aim to attract institutional users through faster transactions and Ethereum compatibility.

2. CryptoFrontNews: Technicals Hint at Breakout

“Descending wedge + RSI divergence suggest 260-300% upside to $0.044 if resistance breaks”
– JAVONMARKS analysis (Source: CryptoFrontNews, 2025-06-28)
What this means: Neutral-bullish. While the pattern suggests explosive potential, ZIL needs to hold $0.01071 support and see volume surge to confirm momentum – currently trades at $0.00514 (-77% YoY).

3. @zilliqa: Staking Flexibility Upgrade Bullish

“Unbonding period slashed from 14→7 days – improves liquidity for stakers”
– @zilliqa (458K followers · 9.8K impressions · 2025-11-26 11:21 UTC)
View original post
What this means: Bullish for network health. Reduced lock-up time could attract more stakers while maintaining security, though ZIL’s staking APR remains undisclosed in sources.

4. Yahoo Finance: Post-Upgrade Reality Check Bearish

“ZIL down 13% weekly despite mainnet upgrade – lacks hype vs newer coins”
– Analysis of November 2025 price action (Source: Yahoo Finance)
What this means: Bearish short-term. Despite functional upgrades, ZIL struggles with visibility – trades below 20/50-day EMAs ($0.0069-$0.0072) as of November 2025, needing reclaim of $0.008 for reversal.

Conclusion

The consensus on ZIL is mixed – bullish on tech upgrades (EVM compatibility, faster staking) but bearish on price traction. Watch migration completion rates (target: 100% staked ZIL moved) and the $0.008 resistance level for signs of a sentiment shift. For holders, the question remains: Can fundamentals outpace the altcoin bear market?

Deep Dive

1. Mainnet 0.19.0 Upgrade (17 November 2025)

Overview:
Zilliqa’s mandatory hard fork slashed the unstaking period from 14 to 7 days and introduced “jailing” for unreliable validators to improve network reliability. The upgrade aimed to attract more stakers by reducing liquidity lock-up risks.

What this means:
Bullish for long-term network health due to improved staking incentives and security. However, ZIL’s price remained subdued post-upgrade, trading below key EMAs ($0.0069), reflecting skepticism about near-term catalysts. (Yahoo Finance)

2. StraitsX Stablecoin Expansion (16 December 2025)

Overview:
Singapore-licensed StraitsX added Solana support for its MAS-regulated XSGD and XUSD stablecoins, building on Zilliqa’s existing integration. XSGD already operates on Zilliqa, processing $18B+ in volume.

What this means:
Neutral-to-bullish for ZIL. While the move diversifies Zilliqa’s stablecoin utility, the focus on Solana may dilute ZIL’s role in StraitsX’s cross-chain strategy. Still, it underscores Zilliqa’s compliance readiness for regulated assets. (CoinMarketCap)

3. Altcoin Market Resilience (19 December 2025)

Overview:
ZIL was highlighted among top discounted altcoins (40%+ below peaks) with strong infrastructure, citing active sharding development and dynamic ecosystem participation.

What this means:
Bullish for sentiment, as the recognition emphasizes ZIL’s technical foundation despite price struggles. However, the token remains down 53% over 90 days, suggesting a disconnect between network activity and valuation. (CryptoNewsLand)

Conclusion

Zilliqa’s recent upgrades and institutional partnerships signal focus on compliance and scalability, but market sentiment remains cautious amid broader altcoin weakness. Will EVM compatibility and staking reforms finally bridge the gap between utility and price action in 2026?

Deep Dive

1. Validator Penalty System (31 October 2025)

Overview: Introduced in the v0.19.0 hardfork, this update automatically jails validators who fail to propose blocks, enhancing network uptime.

Nodes now face stricter accountability, reducing lapses in block production. This targets a pain point from Zilliqa 1.0, where validator reliability occasionally impacted transaction finality.

What this means:
This is bullish for ZIL because it strengthens network integrity, making the chain more attractive for institutional use cases like regulated DeFi. Reduced downtime could improve developer confidence.
(Source)

2. 7-Day Unstaking Period (31 October 2025)

Overview: The unstaking period was halved from 14 days to 7, giving users quicker access to liquidity while maintaining ecosystem stability.

This change aligns with industry standards (e.g., Cosmos, Polkadot) and addresses community feedback about capital flexibility.

What this means:
Neutral for ZIL – while improved UX may attract more stakers, shorter unlock periods could increase sell pressure during market volatility. Node operators must now manage liquidity more actively.
(Source)

3. Zilliqa 2.0 Mainnet Launch (June 2025)

Overview: The landmark upgrade introduced a modular architecture with EVM compatibility, cutting block time to 1.5 seconds (from 30s) and slashing energy use by 99%.

Key technical shifts include migrating from PoW to PoS and enabling customizable x-shards for scalable dApps. Over 2B ZIL was staked within 30 days post-launch.

What this means:
Bullish long-term – EVM support opens doors to Ethereum’s developer base, while faster finality positions ZIL as a contender for high-frequency use cases like payments and trading.
(Source)

Conclusion

Zilliqa’s codebase advances prioritize institutional-grade reliability (validator penalties), user experience (unstaking flexibility), and scalability (EVM + modular design). While recent commits focus on incremental optimizations, the broader vision targets regulated DeFi and RWA tokenization.

How will ZIL’s staking dynamics evolve as the network balances accessibility and security post-v0.19.0?

Deep Dive

1. Mainnet Upgrade 1: Onyx (Post-Launch)

Overview: Onyx introduces x-shards, sovereign application-specific chains that enable modular scaling. These shards allow developers to customize gas fees, privacy settings, and validator sets while maintaining interoperability with Zilliqa’s mainnet.

What this means: This is bullish for ZIL as it could attract regulated DeFi and institutional use cases requiring tailored blockchain environments. However, adoption depends on seamless cross-shard communication and developer uptake.

2. Mainnet Upgrade 2: Carnelian (Future)

Overview: Carnelian focuses on Native Smart Accounts, integrating ERC-4337 standards for features like gasless transactions, multi-factor authentication, and role-based access.

What this means: This is neutral-to-bullish, improving user experience but requiring ecosystem-wide integration. Success hinges on partnerships (e.g., wallets like MetaMask) and reducing friction for mainstream adoption.

3. Mainnet Upgrade 3: Citrine (Future)

Overview: Citrine introduces light clients to support mobile and low-resource devices, alongside enhanced Smart Account functionality for programmable compliance (e.g., KYC/AML).

What this means: This is bullish for broadening access and institutional participation but risks delays if security audits reveal vulnerabilities in lightweight node implementations.

Conclusion

Zilliqa’s roadmap prioritizes scalability, compliance, and Ethereum compatibility to position itself for regulated DeFi and real-world asset tokenization. While technical milestones like x-shards and Smart Accounts could drive utility, execution risks and developer adoption remain critical.

How will Zilliqa balance its modular architecture with maintaining network security as x-shards proliferate?