Latest Zilliqa (ZIL) News Update

Deep Dive

1. @alexsantos_xyz: Recent Momentum and Undervaluation Call Bullish

"$ZIL is showing serious momentum+42% volume spike, price up 3–4%. With Zilliqa 2.0 rolling out and market cap just ~$103M, $ZIL looks massively undervalued. If this volume holds, $0.01+ is in play." – @alexsantos_xyz (260 followers · 2016-01-15 20:14 UTC) View original post What this means: This is bullish for ZIL because it links short-term price action and increased trading interest to the fundamental rollout of Zilliqa 2.0, suggesting a potential re-rating if developer activity translates to sustained demand.

2. @zilliqa: Staking Migration Shows Network Confidence Bullish

"60% of staked ZIL has already moved to the new Zilliqa staking portal. That's 2.4 billion ZIL voting for: 1.3 second blocks, full EVM compatibility, Proof-of-Stake efficiency." – @zilliqa (457K followers · 2025-08-11 11:57 UTC) View original post What this means: This is bullish for ZIL because a large portion of the community is actively participating in the upgraded network, signaling strong holder conviction and supporting the security and utility of the new PoS chain.

3. CoinJournal: Binance Delisting Weighs on Sentiment Bearish

"Zilliqa (ZIL) price has dropped... amid exchange delistings. Binance delisted ZIL trading pairs on January 23, 2026... reducing liquidity and signaling waning exchange support." – CoinJournal (2026-01-26 13:07 UTC) What this means: This is bearish for ZIL because the loss of a major trading venue contracts liquidity, limits arbitrage, and can trigger sell-offs as market access becomes more difficult, overshadowing technical improvements.

Conclusion

The consensus on ZIL is mixed, caught between optimism for its foundational Zilliqa 2.0 upgrade and pessimism from eroding exchange liquidity. Watch for whether new trading venues emerge to replace lost liquidity, as this will be a key test for the network's market viability.

Deep Dive

1. Mainnet Upgrade v0.19.0 (31 October 2025)

Overview: This mandatory hardfork implemented a 7-day unbonding period for unstaking and introduced "jailing" mechanisms to penalize faulty validators. It enhances network liveness by automatically sidelining underperforming nodes.

The upgrade requires validator node updates before block 13,514,400. Jailing prevents validators from proposing blocks if they miss consensus rounds, reducing network downtime. The unbonding period adds flexibility while discouraging impulsive unstaking.
What this means: This is bullish for ZIL because it strengthens network security and validator accountability, creating a more reliable staking environment for delegators.
(Zilliqa)

2. EVM-Compatible Dev Tooling (1 August 2025)

Overview: Full Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) compatibility allows developers to deploy Solidity contracts using familiar tools like MetaMask and Hardhat.

Contracts work without migration pain, with deployment costs reduced to cents versus Ethereum's $100+ fees. The integration supports Zilliqa's faster finality (5 seconds) and modular shards.
What this means: This is bullish for ZIL because it lowers barriers for Ethereum developers to build scalable dApps, potentially increasing ecosystem activity.
(Zilliqa)

3. Zilliqa 2.0 Mainnet Launch (28 June 2025)

Overview: The architectural overhaul replaced Proof-of-Work with Proof-of-Stake, added customizable x-shards, and enabled cross-chain communication.

Key improvements include block time reduction from 30s to 1.5s and 99% lower energy consumption. The modular design allows apps to customize shards for specific needs like privacy or compliance.
What this means: This is bullish for ZIL because it positions the network for institutional adoption with enterprise-grade scalability and RWA tokenization capabilities.
(CoinMarketCap)

Conclusion

Zilliqa's trajectory shows a clear focus on institutional-ready infrastructure: staking security enhancements in v0.19.0, developer accessibility through EVM compatibility, and foundational scalability via Zilliqa 2.0. How will these upgrades impact real-world asset tokenization adoption in 2026?

Deep Dive

1. Price Slides on Delistings & Supply Hike (26 January 2026)

Overview: ZIL's price dropped 3.6% in 24 hours, extending a weekly loss to 7.75%. The decline was attributed to Binance delisting ZIL trading pairs on January 23, 2026, reducing liquidity and arbitrage options. Concurrently, market attention turned to a confirmed circulating supply increase of 443 million ZIL (2.2%) for Q1 2025, stemming from staking rewards and team unlocks. What this means: This is bearish for ZIL in the short term because reduced exchange support limits buying avenues, while the supply influx dilutes value if demand doesn't keep pace. Traders are now watching the key support near $0.00458. (CoinJournal)

2. Upbit Confirms 443M ZIL Supply Increase (26 January 2026)

Overview: Upbit, a leading South Korean exchange, published a detailed update on Zilliqa's circulating supply, confirming an increase of 443,195,861 ZIL for Q1 2025 at the project team's request. This adjustment reflects protocol inflation, staking rewards, and token unlocks, aligning with stricter local regulatory reporting standards. What this means: This is neutral for long-term transparency but bearish for near-term price action as it quantifies previously known inflationary pressure, potentially exacerbating sell-side concerns during weak market sentiment. (BitcoinWorld)

3. Binance Delists 19 Pairs Including ZIL (22 January 2026)

Overview: As part of a broad "market quality" optimization, Binance removed 19 spot trading pairs effective January 23, 2026, which included ZIL/BTC and ZIL/ETH. The exchange cited shifting user preference toward USD-stable pairs and declining volumes in BTC/ETH markets. What this means: This is bearish for ZIL's market structure as it consolidates liquidity into fewer pairs (like ZIL/USDT), reducing trading flexibility and potentially increasing volatility. It signals waning support for altcoin pairs against major cryptocurrencies. (U.Today)

Conclusion

ZIL's trajectory is currently defined by exchange-driven liquidity fragmentation and quantifiable supply inflation, temporarily outweighing the positive fundamentals of its Zilliqa 2.0 upgrade. Will growing ecosystem demand be sufficient to absorb the increased token supply and stabilize price action?

Deep Dive

1. Onyx: X-Shards for Modular Scaling (Post-Launch)

Overview: This is the first major upgrade following the Zilliqa 2.0 mainnet launch. It introduces "x-shards," which are sovereign, application-specific shards that can be customized for performance, privacy, or compliance needs (Zilliqa). They communicate seamlessly with the mainnet, aiming to solve scalability without congesting the core chain. The timeline is designated as "post-launch," with testing success being a key dependency.

What this means: This is bullish for ZIL because it directly addresses scalability, a critical barrier to mass adoption, potentially attracting high-throughput dApps and enterprises. The risk is that complex sharding implementations can introduce technical bugs or fragmentation if adoption is slow.

2. Carnelian: Native Smart Accounts (Future Phase)

Overview: This phase focuses on user experience and programmability by deploying Native Smart Accounts compatible with the ERC-4337 standard. This allows for features like social logins, gasless transactions, and shared wallets, making Web3 interactions more intuitive (Zilliqa). It's part of the long-term vision to make the network "institution-ready."

What this means: This is bullish for ZIL because simplifying the user onboarding process is essential for mainstream and institutional adoption, which could drive new demand for the network and its token. The bearish angle is that account abstraction is becoming a competitive standard; Zilliqa must execute flawlessly to stand out.

3. Citrine: Light Client Support (Future Phase)

Overview: The Citrine upgrade plans to introduce light client functionality, allowing users to interact with the network without running a full node. This is crucial for enabling mobile applications and reducing the hardware requirements for participation, thereby enhancing decentralization and user reach (Zilliqa).

What this means: This is neutral-to-bullish for ZIL because it improves network resilience and accessibility, a positive long-term foundational upgrade. However, as a backend improvement, its immediate impact on price may be less pronounced compared to direct application features like x-shards.

Conclusion

Zilliqa's roadmap is now execution-focused, transitioning from its foundational 2.0 upgrade to delivering modular scaling and superior user experience. The success of these phases hinges on robust technical delivery and the network's ability to attract developers to its new sharding architecture. With significant staked value already migrated, does the community's commitment provide the stability needed for this next stage of growth?