Deep Dive
On 17 September 2026, the post called USELESS a standout on Solana and urged readers to check out an airdrop, but gave no eligibility, timing, or official confirmation. Treat it as promotion, not evidence of a confirmed catalyst.
– @ImThat84499120 (1,452 followers · impressions unavailable · 2026-09-17 14:45 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is neutral for USELESS because promotion may draw attention, but without verifiable airdrop details it does not establish new demand.
2. @bootzz: Bull case cites whale buying bullish
On 14 June 2026, Bootzz called USELESS a potential billion dollar runner, citing a multi-month chart setup and claiming whales were accumulating faster than the broader market was selling. These were the poster’s opinions, not confirmed guarantees.
– @bootzz (3,367 followers · impressions unavailable · 2026-06-14 17:55 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish for USELESS because the thesis depends on continued large-holder buying and a breakout; either fading would weaken it.
3. @kriptofarsi: Older chart call flagged downside bearish
On 16 May 2026, the trader posted a sell signal near $0.0576, with lower targets from $0.055 to $0.0502 and a breakout level at $0.0709. These levels are dated and should not be read as current support or resistance.
– @kriptofarsi (1,121 followers · impressions unavailable · 2026-05-16 20:01 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bearish for USELESS because it reflects downside risk in that period, though it does not establish today’s direction.
Conclusion
The consensus on USELESS is mixed: the available social posts lean promotional and bullish, while an older trading call highlights downside risk. Recent discussion is sparse; on 14 November 2026, CMC data showed USELESS at $0.114, down 15.19% in 24 hours. Watch whether price weakness persists alongside trading volume, which was down 13.94% over the same period.