TerraClassicUSD (USTC) Price Prediction

By CMC AI
05 December 2025 03:03AM (UTC+0)

TLDR

USTC's price trajectory hinges on community-driven upgrades and regulatory headwinds.

  1. Staking & Repeg Plans – Governance votes on USTC utility could boost demand.

  2. Exchange Delistings – Reduced liquidity risks as MiCA forces EU exits.

  3. Burn Momentum – Supply cuts via burns face skepticism without major exchange support.

Deep Dive

1. Staking & Repeg Proposals (Bullish Impact)

Overview: The Terra Classic community is advancing proposals to enable USTC staking and explore a partial re-peg to $0.1. A July 2025 governance poll showed strong support for staking, with Vegas Node (a top validator) leading technical planning. Separately, discussions about stabilizing USTC at $0.1 aim to restore utility for DeFi and cross-chain transactions.

What this means: Staking could lock up circulating supply, while a targeted re-peg—even fractional—might renew confidence in USTC’s role within Terra Classic’s ecosystem. Historical precedent (e.g., LUNC burns) shows community-led initiatives can drive short-term speculative rallies, though sustained gains require tangible adoption.

2. MiCA-Driven Exchange Delistings (Bearish Impact)

Overview: Major exchanges like Kraken and OKX delisted USTC in the European Economic Area (EEA) by March 2025 under MiCA rules, with OKX removing spot pairs globally by September 29, 2025. These actions followed Tether’s failure to meet MiCA transparency standards, affecting USTC’s liquidity.

What this means: Reduced exchange access throttles trading volume—USTC’s 24h turnover is already low at 13% (vs. 30%+ for top alts). While non-EU markets remain open, the loss of institutional-facing platforms could deepen USTC’s reputation as a “legacy” asset.

3. Burn Mechanism Efficacy (Mixed Impact)

Overview: Over 5.1B USTC (~9% of supply) has been burned since May 2022, with 165K USTC incinerated weekly as of July 2025. However, burns lack centralized exchange participation (unlike LUNC’s Binance support), relying entirely on on-chain activity.

What this means: Burns may tighten supply long-term, but their current pace (~0.3% of supply annually) is insufficient to offset selling pressure. For burns to matter, Terra Classic needs a surge in DeFi usage or validator commitments to accelerate the process.

Conclusion

USTC’s path leans on speculative upgrades countering regulatory attrition. Short-term volatility is likely around governance milestones (staking launch, re-peg votes), but lasting recovery requires rebuilding trust post-2022 collapse. Will Terra Classic’s grassroots development outpace the shrinking pool of compliant trading venues?

CMC AI can make mistakes. Not financial advice.