Latest Ravencoin (RVN) News Update

Deep Dive

1. Upbit Listing Sparks 150% Surge (5 June 2025)

Overview: RVN surged 150% to $0.027 after Upbit added a KRW trading pair, with daily volume hitting $445M. The rally cooled to $0.017 amid profit-taking, but marked RVN’s highest price since December 2024. Upbit dominates 73% of South Korea’s crypto volume, making this listing a liquidity catalyst.
What this means: The spike reflects heightened retail demand in a key market, though sustainability depends on broader adoption. Historically, similar exchange-driven rallies (e.g., Orca, Pocket Network) saw 40-70% retracements post-listing. (CoinJournal)

2. Gravity Upgrade Planned for Q4 2025 (11 June 2025)

Overview: Ravencoin’s “Gravity Upgrade” targets 45-second block times (from 90 seconds) and $0.0001 transaction fees, aiming to compete with Layer 2 chains. Three hedge funds reportedly accumulated RVN ahead of the upgrade.
What this means: Efficiency improvements could attract asset tokenization use cases, but RVN faces stiff competition from Ethereum and Solana ecosystems. Watch for developer activity post-upgrade. (OKX)

3. Project Reaffirms Decentralization Focus (24 November 2025)

Overview: Ravencoin’s X account recently emphasized its cypherpunk roots, contrasting with trends toward institutional crypto products like ETFs. The team highlighted IPFS integration for uncensorable data storage.
What this means: While philosophically consistent, this stance may limit short-term institutional inflows but strengthens its niche appeal. Metrics to watch: on-chain asset creation rates and mining decentralization. (Project Raven)

Conclusion

Ravencoin’s 2025 narrative balances exchange-driven volatility with long-term technical upgrades and ideological rigor. While the Upbit listing showcased retail momentum, the Gravity Upgrade’s success will determine whether RVN transitions from a PoW relic to a viable asset tokenization platform. Can decentralized ideals coexist with the scalability demands of real-world adoption?

Deep Dive

1. @Ravencoin: Decentralization as ideological armor 🛡️

"Don’t let anyone disrespect Ravencoin [...] Fiat bros, premined slop, centralized junk [...] Cypherpunk values will prevail."
– @Ravencoin (94.9K followers · 4.7K posts · 4 Nov 2025)
View original post
What this means: Bullish for RVN’s niche appeal as a Bitcoin-inspired, anti-establishment asset. The project’s open-source ethos and six-year uptime counter skepticism about its utility.

2. @genius_sirenBSC: Upbit listing turbocharges volatility 📈

"RVN exploded +53% to $0.02782 [...] whale-driven pump followed by profit-taking"
– @genius_sirenBSC (80K followers · 5 June 2025)
View original post
What this means: Bearish short-term pressure as 94% of the June 2025 gains evaporated post-listing. Current price ($0.00791) sits 71.5% below June’s peak, reflecting weak post-pump retention.

3. Gate.io Blog: Gravity Upgrade could reignite momentum 🚀

Planned Q4 2025 protocol changes:
- Block time reduction: 90s → 45s
- Fees: $0.0001 per transaction
- Target: Compete with Solana/Polygon in DeFi microtransactions
What this means: Neutral until delivery. While upgrades could boost throughput, RVN faces entrenched competitors processing 50K+ TPS versus its current ~10 TPS.

4. CoinJournal: Mining narrative resurfaces ⛏️

KAWPOW algorithm attracted 28% more miners post-Ethereum’s PoS shift. RVN’s hash rate hit 3.2 TH/s in June 2025 (vs. 1.8 TH/s in April).
What this means: Bullish for network security but miner sell pressure persists – 2,500 RVN/block rewards equate to $19.75/block at current prices, incentivizing constant sell-side liquidity.

Conclusion

The consensus on RVN is mixed – ideological loyalty clashes with technical limitations and post-listing volatility. While the Gravity Upgrade and mining narrative provide fundamental hooks, RVN needs sustained developer activity (GitHub commits down 17% YoY) to justify holding through Bitcoin Season. Watch the MVRV Ratio – at -27.99% 30d returns, RVN trades below realized value, historically a contrarian buy signal in its cycles.

Deep Dive

1. Gravity Upgrade (Q4 2025)

Overview:
The Gravity Upgrade, slated for Q4 2025, aims to reduce block times from 90 to 45 seconds and lower transaction fees to $0.0001. This upgrade targets improved scalability for DeFi microtransactions.

What this means:
This is bullish for RVN because faster block times and ultra-low fees could attract developers building tokenized asset platforms. The changes address previous bottlenecks in high-frequency use cases like supply chain tracking or dividend distributions. (Source)

2. IPFS Integration (24 July 2025)

Overview:
Ravencoin deepened its integration with IPFS (InterPlanetary File System), enabling immutable, censorship-resistant storage of asset metadata like legal contracts or digital art.

What this means:
This is neutral for RVN as adoption remains gradual. While IPFS strengthens Ravencoin’s value proposition for RWAs (real-world assets), broader usage depends on ecosystem growth. The team continues promoting this feature through developer outreach. (Source)

3. KAWPOW Optimization (Ongoing)

Overview:
Recent code commits refined the KAWPOW algorithm to maintain ASIC resistance, ensuring GPU miners retain network control. Hashrate stability improved by 12% in Q3 2025.

What this means:
This is bullish for RVN because decentralized mining aligns with its cypherpunk ethos. Sustained GPU miner participation reduces centralization risks, a key differentiator vs. ASIC-dominated chains like Bitcoin.

Conclusion

Ravencoin’s codebase advances prioritize scalability (Gravity), decentralization (KAWPOW), and utility (IPFS). While these updates strengthen its niche in asset tokenization, adoption hinges on real-world use cases gaining traction. How might the Gravity Upgrade’s fee structure impact RVN’s burn rate as asset creation grows?

Deep Dive

1. Trezor Asset Support (Q1 2026)

Overview: The Electrum Ravencoin team is finalizing Trezor hardware wallet integration for sending RVN-based assets, completing a multi-year effort to expand secure asset management options. This follows Ledger’s technical limitations in handling Ravencoin’s unique asset structure.
What this means: Bullish for RVN because hardware wallet compatibility reduces user error risks and attracts institutional asset issuers seeking cold storage solutions. Delays could arise if Trezor’s firmware updates face unexpected hurdles.

2. RavenWallet Mobile App (Q2 2026)

Overview: MoonTree’s RavenWallet project is transitioning from testing its Dart/Flutter framework to building a mobile-first interface with asset creation, management, and atomic swap trading – directly competing with MetaMask for Web3 users.
What this means: Neutral-to-bullish – while a polished mobile wallet could boost retail adoption, success depends on UX parity with established competitors. Development pace suggests a late Q2 2026 release if no major bugs emerge.

3. Squawker Protocol Upgrades (2026)

Overview: Squawker’s roadmap includes encrypted on-chain messaging and RSS feeds, allowing users to curate decentralized content streams via IPFS and Ravencoin asset tags. The team is seeking contributors to accelerate the Chrome extension for decryption.
What this means: Bullish long-term – if successful, this could position RVN as a censorship-resistant alternative to platforms like Nostr. However, low developer activity (per GitHub) raises execution risks.

4. Core Wallet Atomic Swap Integration (2026)

Overview: After completing swap execution in Q3 2025, developers are integrating atomic swap creation into the core wallet, enabling peer-to-peer trading without third-party platforms.
What this means: Bullish for decentralization – native swaps reduce reliance on centralized exchanges. However, liquidity fragmentation could initially limit utility compared to orderbook-based DEXs.

Conclusion

Ravencoin’s 2026 priorities focus on hardening infrastructure (Trezor/Core wallet upgrades) and expanding use cases (Squawker/RavenWallet). While these developments align with its cypherpunk ethos, delivery timelines hinge on community contributions rather than funded teams. Will increased institutional interest in tokenized RWAs accelerate adoption beyond current niche users?