Latest Across Protocol (ACX) News Update

Deep Dive

1. @AcrossProtocol: Zero-Exploit Bridging Dominance

"Bridged $28B+ across Ethereum L2s with $0 lost"
– @AcrossProtocol (124K followers · 17.6K likes · 2025-08-07)
View original post
What this means: Bullish for ACX as security remains a key selling point in bridge wars, especially with alt season volume spikes.

2. @SOScryptoFND: Anoma Ecosystem Boost

"Across elevates Anoma beyond simple bridging into multi-step ops"
– @SOScryptoFND (33K followers · 6.6K likes · 2025-09-02)
View original post
What this means: Neutral-to-bullish – deeper integration with privacy-focused chains could expand use cases but depends on Anoma’s adoption.

3. @cryptonewsland: $23M Governance Scandal Fallout

"Insider wallets allegedly pushed DAO proposals benefiting Risk Labs"
– Cryptonewsland (report · 2025-06-27)
View article
What this means: Bearish – eroded trust in decentralized governance mechanisms, with ACX still trading 91% below ATH post-revelations.

Conclusion

The consensus on ACX is mixed – bullish on tech (ZKPs, MetaMask/PancakeSwap integrations) but bearish on governance transparency. Watch the circulating supply unlock schedule (391M tokens vesting) for potential sell pressure vs. adoption metrics like bridging volume on new chains like Monad. Either the tech delivers alpha, or the ghosts of June ‘25 haunt harder.

Deep Dive

1. Non-EVM & Prefill Support (Proposed 27 June 2025)

Overview: This upgrade allows Across to support non-EVM chains (e.g., Solana) and "prefill" transactions where relayers fulfill user requests before on-chain confirmation.

Key changes include renaming core contract methods/events (FilledV3Relay → FilledRelay), handling bytes32 addresses for non-EVM chains, and breaking changes for integrators. Developers must update their implementations to accommodate new validation logic.

What this means: This is bullish for ACX because it opens new markets (e.g., Solana users) and positions Across as a leader in cross-chain UX. However, integration risks exist if partners delay updates.
(Source)

2. V4 ZK Verification System (Live 21 July 2025)

Overview: V4 integrates zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to verify Ethereum state changes on any chain, eliminating reliance on chain-specific adapters.

After relayers batch transactions, a "finalizer" service generates ZK proofs that Ethereum’s HubPoolStore contract wrote specific message hashes. Chains like Monad and BSC use these proofs to authenticate transactions via a universal pipeline (Verifier + SP1Helios contracts).

What this means: This is neutral-to-bullish for ACX. While it reduces technical debt and centralization risks, the complexity of ZK tooling may slow adoption. Long-term, it strengthens Ethereum’s role as cross-chain anchor.
(Source)

Conclusion

Across is prioritizing interoperability beyond EVM chains and trustless verification, aligning with multi-chain trends. While these upgrades could widen its user base, how quickly ecosystems like Solana adopt Across’ infrastructure will be critical. Will ACX’s utility expand alongside these technical milestones?

Deep Dive

1. MetaMask Integration (9 December 2025)

Overview:
Across embedded its routing tech into MetaMask’s Swap and Bridge features, enabling crosschain transactions for Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Base, and Optimism directly within the wallet. The integration reduces transaction times to minutes and fees by ~0.1% compared to competitors.

What this means:
This is bullish for ACX as it taps MetaMask’s 30M+ user base, potentially increasing transaction volume and protocol fees. However, success depends on user adoption amid crowded bridge markets (CoinMarketCap).

2. Monad Blockchain Launch (24 November 2025)

Overview:
Across expanded to Monad, a high-speed Layer 1, using Succinct Labs’ SP1 ZK proofs for trustless verification. The integration targets DeFi users needing sub-second finality for assets like ETH and stablecoins.

What this means:
Neutral-to-bullish – while diversifying Across’ chain coverage, Monad’s nascent ecosystem may limit immediate volume. The ZK-proof infrastructure could enhance security branding long-term (Across Protocol).

3. DAO Controversy Rebuttal (27 June 2025)

Overview:
Co-founder Hart Lambur denied allegations of misusing $23M in ACX tokens via DAO votes, asserting Risk Labs (a Cayman nonprofit) holds tokens for protocol upgrades. ACX fell 45% in Q3 2025 post-allegations.

What this means:
Bearish short-term due to eroded trust, but Lambur’s transparency pledge (e.g., clearer wallet disclosures) may stabilize sentiment if followed through. On-chain governance participation remains a monitorable risk (CoinMarketCap).

Conclusion

Across balances growth (MetaMask/Monad) with governance credibility challenges. While technical expansions align with multi-chain trends, lingering skepticism around DAO controls could cap upside. Will Q1 2026 usage metrics validate its integration-driven growth strategy?

Deep Dive

1. Universal Bridge Adapter (UBA) Revival (2026)

Overview: Originally shelved in 2023 due to technical hurdles, the UBA aims to enable bridging for chains without native Ethereum connectors (e.g., Avalanche, BNB Chain). The 2026 iteration reportedly leverages zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to verify Ethereum state changes trustlessly, bypassing dependency on canonical bridges.

What this means: Bullish for ACX as it could unlock 15-20% more addressable market share in cross-chain volume. However, delayed timelines (originally planned for 2025) highlight execution risks in complex cryptography implementations.

2. Mobile App Development (Q2 2026)

Overview: A native mobile app is under active development, integrating Across’ intents-based bridging directly into iOS/Android wallets. This follows successful MetaMask and PancakeSwap integrations in late 2025 that drove 127% QoQ user growth.

What this means: Neutral-to-bullish – while mobile adoption could tap retail users, app store policies and gas fee UX remain hurdles. Success depends on seamless fiat onramps, not yet confirmed in roadmap details.

3. Fee-Sharing Mechanism (H1 2026)

Overview: A governance proposal aims to redirect 30-50% of protocol fees (currently ~$1.2M monthly) to ACX stakers, aligning incentives with long-term holders. This follows Velodrome-style tokenomics observed in competitor systems.

What this means: Bullish if implemented – staking yields could offset ACX’s -53% 90d price decline. However, token unlocks (391M ACX remaining) may dilute benefits if demand doesn’t scale proportionally.

4. Non-EVM Chain Support (2026)

Overview: After launching on Solana and Monad in 2025, Across plans expansions to Cosmos and Bitcoin L2s via ZKP-based light clients. This aligns with industry shifts toward intent-centric interoperability per ERC-7683 standards.

What this means: High-risk, high-reward – while non-EVM chains represent 38% of DeFi TVL, bridging to Bitcoin ecosystems remains largely untested. Technical audits and liquidity bootstrapping will be critical.

Conclusion

Across Protocol is prioritizing chain expansion and user-facing products to capitalize on cross-chain demand, though execution risks loom. With ACX trading 91% below ATH, how might fee-sharing and mobile adoption reshape its value capture in a multi-chain world?