Smart Token

Value

UNCX Network

BounceBit

Ethereum-based privacy project Zipcoin has <a href="https://x.com/zipcoincash/status/2113219642575421909" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">announced its shutdown</a> following an exploit involving its locked tokens and a separate warning that its codebase and private keys may have been compromised.
The October 22 decision follows a security breach at <a href="https://cryptoadventure.com/uncx-review-2026-liquidity-locks-token-vesting-and-launch-infrastructure/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">UNCX Network</a> that exposed approximately 1.1% of ZC’s total supply. Zipcoin initially attempted to contain the fallout through token buybacks but has now abandoned development following the additional security concerns.
The team gave holders a six-hour window to exit their positions before a planned liquidation of its remaining treasury allocation, representing approximately 2.2% of the token supply. The sale was scheduled for noon U.S. Eastern Time on October 22.
<h2 id="uncx-vesting-exploit-drained-nearly-11-million-zc">UNCX Vesting Exploit Drained Nearly 11 Million ZC</h2>
Zipcoin’s difficulties began with the <a href="https://uncx.network/vesting-incident" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">UNCX Smart Token Vesting V2 exploit</a> on October 14, when attackers manipulated internal share-accounting calculations to withdraw tokens belonging to other vesting positions.
The vulnerability affected 10 tokens across Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base and Robinhood Chain, with 11 confirmed unauthorized withdrawal transactions.
On Ethereum, attackers removed approximately 10.84 million ZC from the vesting manager after accounting for returned tokens, equivalent to roughly 1.1% of Zipcoin’s one-billion-token maximum supply.
The primary attacker subsequently converted stolen ZC into approximately 6.52 ETH, while separate copycat transactions extracted additional proceeds.
Zipcoin initially continued operating and used treasury resources to support token buybacks. However, a subsequent security warning reportedly indicated that its entire codebase had been compromised, potentially exposing private keys and sensitive project infrastructure.
The team cited this additional threat in its decision to close. The full extent of the alleged codebase compromise, including which keys may have been exposed, has not been established through a public technical investigation.
A different <a href="https://cryptoadventure.com/grafana-says-github-token-compromise-exposed-codebase-no-customer-data-found/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">codebase exposure</a> affected Grafana earlier this year, when unauthorized GitHub access allowed an attacker to download company repositories. Zipcoin’s reported concerns extend to potentially compromised private keys, although independent confirmation remains unavailable.
<h2 id="stockereum-demands-return-of-12-66-eth-as-holders-protest">Stockereum Demands Return of 12.66 ETH as Holders Protest</h2>
The closure has triggered criticism from investors and Stockereum, the Ethereum launchpad through which ZC originally entered circulation.
Stockereum <a href="https://x.com/Stockereum/status/2113232750115275099" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">demanded the return of 12.66 ETH</a>, alleging that the funds had been transferred to Zipcoin’s foundation wallet and should be returned following the shutdown.
The launchpad’s <a href="https://stockereum.com/dashboard" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">transaction dashboard</a> also records a 12.660 ETH entry associated with the ZC Foundation, although the precise repayment obligation remains disputed.
Community members questioned why the project was shutting down rather than isolating compromised infrastructure, rotating exposed credentials and conducting an independent security review.
Some holders reported substantial investment losses, including individual claims reaching approximately $10,000.
The backlash also focused on the planned treasury liquidation. Selling the remaining project-controlled tokens into an already weakened market could create additional pressure on ZC liquidity during the closing trading window.
<h2 id="zc-market-value-collapses-as-project-prepares-final-sale">ZC Market Value Collapses as Project Prepares Final Sale</h2>
Zipcoin previously reached an all-time high near $0.043 on October 4, implying a fully diluted valuation of approximately $43 million.
The token’s value subsequently collapsed, with its <a href="https://defillama.com/protocol/zipcoin" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">market capitalization</a> falling sharply as the security incidents and shutdown announcement damaged investor confidence.
Zipcoin’s planned closure follows other cryptocurrency projects abandoning compromised infrastructure. In August, <a href="https://cryptoadventure.com/bouncebit-shuts-down-layer-1-after-3m-bb-exploit-moves-token-to-bnb-chain/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">BounceBit shut down its Layer 1</a> following a $3 million authorization exploit, although it opted to migrate its token to BNB Chain rather than discontinue its broader operations.
Zipcoin has not announced a replacement token, compensation program or formal recovery arrangement for affected investors.
The team’s immediate plan centers on the six-hour holder exit period and liquidation of approximately 22 million remaining ZC tokens. Whether proceeds will fund any recovery or repayment process has not been disclosed.
The post <a href="https://cryptoadventure.com/zipcoin-shuts-down-after-uncx-exploit-and-codebase-compromise-warning/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Zipcoin Shuts Down After UNCX Exploit and Codebase Compromise Warning</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cryptoadventure.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Crypto Adventure</a>.

Zipcoin Shuts Down After UNCX Exploit and Codebase Compromise Warning

Table of Contents

Crypto Adventure

Other articles published on Oct 22, 2026

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!