Order

Prime

Bitcoin

Online

Reserve

<p>A new controversy is spreading across crypto media and X, claiming the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) violated President <a href="https://coinpedia.org/news/bitcoin-price-hits-94000-amid-venezuela-uncertainty-and-u-s-regulatory-hopes/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Donald Trump’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve executive order</a> by selling forfeited Bitcoin instead of holding it.</p>
<p>According to multiple crypto publications and <a href="https://x.com/BitcoinArchive/status/2008275583923372108" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">industry experts</a>, the DOJ, through the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), allegedly sold 57.55 BTC (worth around $6M) in November 2025 via Coinbase Prime. The Bitcoin was forfeited by Samourai Wallet co-founders Keonne Rodriguez and William Lonergan Hill.</p>
<p>The rumor gained huge attention, so Coinpedia stepped in to review the facts to verify whether this claim holds up.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-who-made-this-claim"><strong>Who Made This Claim?</strong></h2>
<p>The allegation originated from multiple <a href="https://x.com/TFTC21/status/2008280086630506648" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">posts on X</a> and was intensified by several crypto-focused publications and high-profile commentators.&nbsp;</p>
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full">
 <img width="778" height="944" src="https://image.coinpedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/06140457/U.S.-Marshals-sold-57.5-BTC-seized-in-the-Samourai-Wallet.webp" alt="U.S. Marshals sold 57.5 BTC seized in the Samourai Wallet">
</figure>
<p>These posts cited court documents related to the Samourai Wallet case and claimed the BTC sale directly conflicts with Executive Order 14233, which reportedly mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be held in the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.&nbsp;</p>
<p>But is this claim true? Let’s break it down.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-coinpedia-s-key-findings-what-s-actually-true"><strong>Coinpedia’s Key Findings: What’s Actually True?</strong></h2>
<p>The BTC Sale Was Backed by a Court-Approved Agreement</p>
<p>Court documents show that Rodriguez and Hill entered into an Asset Liquidation Agreement with the U.S. government. Under this agreement, they voluntarily consented to the liquidation of approximately $6.36 million worth of Bitcoin by the USMS.</p>
<p>The agreement explicitly authorizes the USMS to:</p>
<ul>
 <li>Transfer custody of the Bitcoin</li>
 <li>Liquidate it immediately</li>
 <li>Convert the proceeds into U.S. dollars</li>
</ul>
<p>This process is standard in federal forfeiture cases and was legally approved before any sale occurred.</p>
<ul>
 <li>No On-chain Proof that the Sale Happened After the Order Took Effect</li>
</ul>
<p>While reports claim the BTC was sold in November 2025, Coinpedia’s findings <a href="https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/keonne-rodriguez-and-william-lonergan-hill" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">reveal that</a> there is no public confirmation of a sell-off.</p>
<p>On November 3, 2025, approximately 57.55 BTC was transferred from a Samourai-linked address (bc1q4….a22r) to a Coinbase Prime deposit wallet. The funds were then swept into other Coinbase Prime wallets, which is a normal custodial activity.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full">
 <img width="951" height="273" src="https://image.coinpedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/06140625/BTC-Transfer-Data.webp" alt="BTC Transfer Data">
</figure>
<p>At no point did the Bitcoin leave Coinbase-controlled infrastructure. The data blockchain displays internal transfers only, not actual sales. A zero balance at the deposit address simply means the funds were consolidated, not liquidated.&nbsp;</p>
<p>As a result, on-chain data alone cannot confirm whether the BTC was sold or retained in custody.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large">
 <img width="1024" height="560" src="https://image.coinpedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/06140655/On-Chain-Data-1024x560.webp" alt="On Chain Data">
</figure>
<ul>
 <li>Executive Order 14233 Does Override Court-Ordered Forfeiture</li>
</ul>
<p>Even if Executive Order 14233 exists and says “forfeited bitcoin should be held</p>
<ul>
 <li>Criminal forfeiture is governed by courts, not agencies</li>
 <li>Judges can order liquidation as part of sentencing, restitution, or settlement</li>
 <li>The U.S. Marshals Service executes court orders, not policy preferences</li>
</ul>
<p>Despite this, there is also no official DOJ filing, court objection, or government statement indicating that the Bitcoin sale happened or violated any executive directive.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-summary-table-coinpedia-s-evidence-vs-the-claim"><strong>Summary Table: Coinpedia’s Evidence vs the Claim</strong></h2>
<figure class="wp-block-table">
 <table class="has-fixed-layout">
  <tbody>
   <tr>
    <td><strong>Claim Circulating Online</strong></td>
    <td><strong>Coinpedia’s Findings</strong></td>
   </tr>
   <tr>
    <td>DOJ violated the Bitcoin reserve order</td>
    <td>No proof of retroactive applicability</td>
   </tr>
   <tr>
    <td>USMS sold BTC illegally</td>
    <td>The sale is authorized by a court-approved agreement</td>
   </tr>
   <tr>
    <td>The executive order blocked the liquidation</td>
    <td>No such restriction was stated publicly</td>
   </tr>
   <tr>
    <td>Coinbase Prime sale confirms breach</td>
    <td>No on-chain data shows the confirmation of sales&nbsp;</td>
   </tr>
  </tbody>
 </table>
</figure>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-conclusion">Conclusion</h2>
<figure class="wp-block-table fact-check-table">
 <table class="has-fixed-layout">
  <tbody>
   <tr>
    <td>Claim</td>
    <td>DOJ violated President Trump’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve executive order by selling forfeited Bitcoin.</td>
   </tr>
   <tr>
    <td>Verdict</td>
    <td>❌ False</td>
   </tr>
   <tr>
    <td>Fact-Check by Coinpedia</td>
    <td>Coinpedia’s review shows that the Bitcoin sale linked to the Samourai Wallet case was conducted under a court-approved asset liquidation agreement. There is no verified evidence that Executive Order 14233 applies retroactively or that the DOJ breached any legal directive.&nbsp;As of now, claims of a violation are misleading and unproven.</td>
   </tr>
  </tbody>
 </table>
</figure>

Fact Check: Did the DOJ Break Trump’s Bitcoin Reserve Order by Selling Bitcoin?

Table of Contents

CoinPedia News

Other articles published on Jan 6, 2026

What Happens Next For Cardano After 21% Weekly Surge Meets Cooling Momentum?

Web3 Games Enter 2026 With Treeverse, emoji™, Hive Invasion

USDT on TRON Gets Regulatory Green Light in Abu Dhabi

Gate Ventures Outlook for 2026: Five Trends Reshaping Crypto

The $7M Trust Wallet Extension Hack: All You Need to Know

Lighter Protocol Launches LIT Token with Community Airdrop

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!