Ethereum

Satoshi

Satoshi Nakamoto

Bitcoin

Pseudonymous Bitcoin stock-to-flow (S2F) model creator PlanB attacked Ethereum and mocked the project’s co-founder, Vitalik Buterin.PlanB mockingly reposted a June 2022 X post by Buterin in which the Ethereum co-founder said S2F “is really not looking good now.” PlanB responded with a new posting stating, “Ethereum is really not looking good now.”<figure><img alt="Vitalik Buterin" src="https://s3.cointelegraph.com/uploads/2025-04/0196587c-7562-70bc-8160-6c42b63e0eec" title=""><figcaption style="text-align: center;">Source: <a href="https://x.com/100trillionUSD/status/1913958019836035125" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">PlanB</a></figcaption></figure>In his response to Buterin’s criticism from years ago, PlanB claimed Ethereum and the network’s coin, Ether (<a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">ETH</a>), are centralized and premined, pointing to its shift to proof-of-stake (PoS) and changes in its issuance rate. He said that those features “are harmful and deserve all the mockery they get,” echoing Buterin’s old comment about S2F.Related: <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-analyst-btc-transfer-spot-etfs-private-keys" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Bitcoin analyst PlanB transfers Bitcoin to ETFs to avoid 'hassle with keys'</a><h2 id="planb-s-criticism-of-ethereum">PlanB’s criticism of Ethereum</h2>In a separate X <a href="https://x.com/100trillionUSD/status/1914233158184140843" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">post</a>, PlanB explained that an Ethereum full node requires nine terabytes of disk space, meaning he “can not run it” on his hardware. The kind of node in question is probably an Ethereum archival node, which, <a href="https://etherscan.io/chartsync/chainarchive" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">according</a> to Etherscan data, requires over 21.8 terabytes (TB) with the Geth client.An Ethereum full node running the Geth client that prunes older states with the default settings requires 1.28 TB, <a href="https://etherscan.io/chartsync/chaindefault" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">according</a> to Etherscan data. The Bitcoin (<a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">BTC</a>) and Ethereum communities have long debated what constitutes a full node.This type of pruned node cannot access the full historical data or generate Merkle proofs for old blocks, which limits its research and bug-finding applications. Still, such nodes can engage in full trustless block and transaction validation.Bitcoin’s full nodes require under 700 gigabytes (0.7 terabytes), <a href="https://www.statista.com/statistics/647523/worldwide-bitcoin-blockchain-size/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">according</a> to Statista&nbsp;data, and also require much less computing power. This means that users can run Bitcoin full nodes much more easily, leading to a higher node count and higher network decentralization.Not everyone views the criticism as founded. Jeremiah O’Connor, chief technology officer and co-founder at crypto cybersecurity firm Trugard, told Cointelegraph:<blockquote> “PlanB’s take is classic Bitcoin maxi energy — loud, confident and missing half the picture.“
</blockquote>O’Connor explained that Ethereum and Bitcoin serve two different purposes. He said that “Ethereum nodes are bigger and more complex” since Ether “isn’t just digital gold — it’s a full-on global computer.”<blockquote> “Of course it’s heavier.“
</blockquote>He conceded that users relying on centralized data providers like Infura is a problem. Still, he claimed that every ecosystem engages in centralization tradeoffs and that Ethereum developers are working to address the issue, and “it’s evolving fast.”“Calling ETH a “shitcoin” because it’s not Bitcoin is like calling smartphones a scam because they aren’t landlines,“ he said.He added that the two are different tools with differing purposes. He views Bitcoin as a “rock-solid value storage” and Ethereum as “where the builders are,” and said that “both matter” and “complement each other.”Related: <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/explained/can-the-ethereum-blockchain-roll-back-transactions-understanding-the-limits-and-risks" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Can the Ethereum blockchain roll back transactions? Understanding the limits and risks</a><h2 id="buterin-as-a-single-point-of-failure">Buterin as a “single point of failure”</h2>PlanB also questioned Buterin’s influence on Ethereum’s development, calling him a “single point of failure.” However, Ethereum Foundation co-executive director Tomasz Stańczak recently <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/ethereum-foundation-user-experience-layer-1-scaling-leadership-shift" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">announced that Buterin is stepping back</a> from day-to-day operations to focus on research.PlanB also raised an issue with&nbsp;<a href="https://cointelegraph.com/explained/can-the-ethereum-blockchain-roll-back-transactions-understanding-the-limits-and-risks" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Ethereum rolling back transactions</a>&nbsp;following the 2016 DAO hack:<blockquote> “The fact that this is even possible should worry you.“
</blockquote><a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/bybit-ceo-discusses-possibility-ethereum-blockchain-rollback" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Bybit CEO Ben Zhou suggested an Ethereum rollback</a> following the exchange’s $1.4 billion hack. Still, many in the community argued that a rollback happening now, with Ethereum being a more mature network, would be next to impossible.Bitcoin itself had a comparable incident in its early history as well. On Aug. 15, 2010, an exploit resulted in a transaction that <a href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">minted 184 BTC on the network</a> in block 74638.Satoshi Nakamoto (still involved in development at the time) and other core developers released an update that rolled back the network to block 74637 and patched the vulnerability. In other words, Bitcoin saw its own blockchain rollback in its early days.Other points raised by PlanB include Ethereum switching to PoS, which he claims has consequences for the price. He suggested that changes to issuance and governance undermine Ethereum’s value proposition compared to Bitcoin’s fixed and predictable supply.Magazine: <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/crypto-more-taboo-than-onlyfans-violetta-zironi-who-sold-song-for-1-btc/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Crypto ‘more taboo than OnlyFans,’ says Violetta Zironi, who sold song for 1 BTC</a>

Bitcoiner PlanB slams ETH: ‘Centralized & premined’ shitcoin

Table of Contents

Cointelegraph

Other articles published on Apr 21, 2025

11 Trillion SHIB and Then 15 Trillion: Shiba Inu in Massive Trap

JOIN 10,000,000 USDT from MEXC the Rustam Burkeev LETIT AI Predictor Partner Exclusive Celebratio...

Avail Ecosystem: The Foundation for Next Gen Rollups

XRP, Cardano, Mantra… Or Web3 ai? Traders Say This $0.0003 Token Is the Top Crypto to Buy Right Now

U.S. stocks fall as China adds to tariff jitters

Ripple's XRP Shows High Volatility, Poised for Key Price Movement

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!