Latest Viction (VIC) News Update

Deep Dive

1. @genius_sirenBSC: V3 Upgrade Turbocharges Ecosystem Bullish

"Viction v3’s leveraged NFT staking drove 120% TVL growth, while Chainlink oracles saw 45% usage spike post-integration. Whale withdrawals cut circulating supply as price reclaimed $0.18 pivot."
– @genius_sirenBSC (80.1K followers · 467K impressions · 2025-07-07 05:54 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish for VIC because reduced supply and enhanced DeFi utility could sustain price momentum if adoption continues.

2. @Tokocrypto: Sync Issues Can’t Stop 84% Rally Mixed

"VIC melejit 84% dalam 24 jam! Meski jaringan alami gangguan sinkronisasi, pasar tetap percaya diri."
– @Tokocrypto (Unknown followers · 11.1K impressions · 2025-07-07 11:11 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is mixed – technical hiccups contrast with strong market confidence, suggesting traders prioritize narrative over network stability short-term.

3. Bybit Report: Code Allows Asset Freezing Bearish

Viction was among 16 chains with hardcoded freezing functions, per Bybit’s Lazarus Lab. BNB Chain and VeChain share this trait, challenging decentralization narratives.
– Bybit Research (2025-11-13 23:00 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bearish for VIC as it undermines Web3’s core value proposition of censorship resistance, potentially deterring privacy-focused users.

4. @BuildOnViction: 2.5M VIC Retrodrop Fuels Builders Bullish

"Community-Led Growth model won 65.47% vote for Retrodrop S2 – 2.5M $VIC allocated to devs and DAOs based on verified on-chain impact."
– @BuildOnViction (199.8K followers · 42.4K impressions · 2025-07-19 03:38 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish as it incentivizes organic ecosystem growth while locking tokens in staking/validation, reducing sell pressure.

Conclusion

The consensus on VIC is mixed, balancing bullish infrastructure upgrades against bearish centralization concerns. While the Atlas Hard Fork (2025-08-21) and TVL nearing $12M signal technical momentum, the asset-freezing revelation complicates its decentralization narrative. Watch whether the Retrodrop’s 2.5M VIC distribution translates into sustained developer activity post-airdrop.

Deep Dive

1. On-Chain Freezing Exposed (13 November 2025)

Overview:
Bybit’s Lazarus Security Lab identified Viction as one of 16 blockchains with protocol-level mechanisms to freeze user funds. Viction’s “hardcoded freezing” feature is embedded directly in its source code, allowing asset locks without user consent. The report highlights real-world cases like BNB Chain’s $570M exploit response in 2022, justifying such tools for security but raising centralization concerns.

What this means:
This is neutral-to-bearish for VIC as it underscores trade-offs between security and decentralization. While emergency controls can mitigate hacks, they contradict crypto’s core ethos of censorship resistance. Investors may reassess governance risks, though no active misuse by Viction has been reported (Bitcoinist).

2. Binance Backs Network Upgrade (20 August 2025)

Overview:
Binance suspended VIC deposits/withdraws temporarily on 21 August 2025 to support Viction’s Atlas Hard Fork. The upgrade retired legacy systems like TomoX, introduced the VRC25 token standard, and optimized gas limits for scalability.

What this means:
This is bullish for VIC, as Binance’s integration signals confidence in Viction’s technical roadmap. The upgrade aims to attract developers with Ethereum-compatible tools, potentially driving long-term adoption (CoinMarketCap).

3. Ownership Economy Momentum (18 July 2025)

Overview:
Viction’s Q2 2025 metrics showed 40,000 daily active users (4x Q1 growth) and $12M TVL, fueled by DeFi, NFTs, and cross-border payments. Initiatives like FrontierDAO’s global chapters and the Viction Vanguard contributor program expanded its footprint in Turkey, Southeast Asia, and Africa.

What this means:
This is bullish for VIC, reflecting tangible adoption of its zero-gas, EVM-compatible chain. However, the 50% price drop since July suggests market skepticism about sustainability despite usage growth (Cointelegraph).

Conclusion

Viction faces a pivotal moment: Its ecosystem growth clashes with revelations about centralized controls, testing investor trust. While technical upgrades and emerging-market adoption signal resilience, the freezing mechanism controversy could deter decentralization purists. Will Viction’s security pragmatism coexist with its “Own What Matters” ethos, or will users seek alternatives?

Deep Dive

1. Atlas Hard Fork (21 August 2025)

Overview: The Atlas Hard Fork was a mandatory network upgrade designed to optimize Viction’s blockchain performance and developer experience. Key changes included retiring TomoX (its legacy DEX protocol), adopting the VRC25 token standard, and reducing block gas limits.

This overhaul aimed to streamline operations for developers and improve transaction efficiency. Node operators were required to upgrade their software by August 21, 2025, with Binance and other exchanges supporting the transition.

What this means: This is bullish for VIC because it strengthens the network’s scalability and developer appeal, potentially driving more dApp deployments. Users benefit from smoother interactions, while reduced gas limits lower costs for high-frequency transactions. (Source)

2. Viction Core Upgrade (June 2025)

Overview: A critical upgrade improved network stability under peak load, reduced transaction failures, and enhanced user experience. Metrics showed a 14% month-on-month rise in active users post-upgrade.

What this means: This is neutral for VIC as it addresses technical debt rather than adding new features. However, improved reliability could boost long-term adoption by minimizing downtime and fostering trust. (Source)

3. VRC25 Standard Adoption (July 2025)

Overview: The VRC25 token standard replaced older protocols, offering developers more flexibility in creating tokens with customizable features (e.g., royalties, burn mechanics).

What this means: This is bullish for VIC as it attracts developers to build innovative applications, increasing utility. End-users gain access to richer token functionalities, such as loyalty programs like $BOBA. (Source)

Conclusion

Viction’s codebase updates reflect a focus on scalability, stability, and developer empowerment. The Atlas Hard Fork positions the network for future growth, while the VRC25 standard expands tokenization possibilities. With these upgrades, can Viction sustain its momentum in attracting builders and users?

Deep Dive

1. Ecosystem Development Pool Distribution (2024–2028)

Overview:
The VIP #1 proposal allocates 80M $VIC to drive adoption, with 20M $VIC for developer grants, 20M for community programs, and 20M for infrastructure/R&D. Funds are distributed over four years, managed initially by the Viction Foundation, with gradual decentralization.

What this means:
This is bullish for $VIC as it directly funds ecosystem expansion, attracting developers and users. However, inflationary pressure from new token minting (max supply raised to 210M) could weigh on price if adoption lags.

2. VIC RetroDrops Program (Q3 2024–2028)

Overview:
Quarterly airdrops of 1.25M $VIC target stakers, governance participants, and projects building on Viction. Eligibility expands over time to include users of Viction-based dApps.

What this means:
Neutral-to-bullish – RetroDrops incentivize engagement but risk dilution if recipients sell immediately. Success hinges on retaining users through utility (e.g., NFT staking, DeFi integrations).

3. Community Governance Transition (2026–2028)

Overview:
Per VIP #1, control of the Ecosystem Development Pool shifts to community governance once “the community becomes stronger.” This includes voting on fund allocation and partnership approvals.

What this means:
Bullish long-term – Decentralized governance could enhance trust and innovation. However, delays in implementation or low voter turnout might stall progress.

Conclusion

Viction’s roadmap balances short-term ecosystem incentives with long-term decentralization goals. Key risks include inflation from token minting and execution delays, while upside hinges on converting airdrop recipients into long-term stakeholders. Will community-led governance accelerate adoption or expose coordination challenges?