Latest Mubarakah (MUBARAKAH) News Update

Deep Dive

1. WeChat Hack Triggers 200% Pump (10 December 2025)

Overview:
Attackers hijacked Binance Co-CEO Yi He’s dormant WeChat account on December 9, promoting MUBARAKAH in a pump-and-dump scheme. Two wallets bought 21.16M tokens ($19.5K) pre-hack, then sold 11.95M during the 200% surge to net $55K profit. Binance’s CZ warned users to avoid the scam, confirming no internal systems were breached.

What this means:
The incident underscores meme coins’ susceptibility to social engineering. While MUBARAKAH’s price spiked to $0.007283 (vs. $0.0007 pre-pump), it later corrected to $0.00336 (–54%), reflecting low liquidity and high speculative risk. (Lookonchain)

2. SIM-Swap Risks Exposed (11 December 2025)

Overview:
The hack exploited China’s recycled phone number system and weak SMS-based 2FA. SlowMist founder Yu Xuan noted attackers only needed access to Yi He’s “frequent contacts” to bypass security – a flaw in WeChat’s recovery process.

What this means:
This reveals systemic risks for crypto leaders using Web2 platforms. While MUBARAKAH itself wasn’t compromised, the event could pressure projects to adopt Web3-native communication tools, potentially reducing future pump-and-dump vectors. (Coinlive)

3. Market Cap Volatility (10 December 2025)

Overview:
MUBARAKAH’s market cap swung from $1.7M to $8M during the hack, settling at $3.8M. Despite the volatility, it remains 88% below its March 2025 ATH of $0.026.

What this means:
The token’s 24h turnover ratio of 1.89 signals thin liquidity, amplifying price swings. With RSI at 79.6 post-surge, overbought conditions suggest traders should monitor sell-side pressure.

Conclusion

MUBARAKAH’s recent drama hinges on security flaws in legacy platforms, not protocol fundamentals. While the hack briefly revived trading activity, sustained momentum would require organic utility – a hurdle for most memecoins. Will enhanced executive account security curb future exploits, or simply shift attackers to new targets?

Deep Dive

1. Community-Driven Governance (March 2025)

Overview:
A community claimed ownership of Mubarakah in March 2025, rebranding it as a grassroots project focused on “spreading blessings” through meme culture (DEX Screener). No formal governance structure or voting mechanisms have been announced, leaving coordination reliant on social media.

What this means:
This is neutral for MUBARAKAH because while decentralization aligns with crypto ideals, the lack of clear leadership or utility risks stagnation. Recent price volatility (-21% in 24h) reflects uncertainty about long-term direction.

2. Exchange Listings & Delistings (March–May 2025)

Overview:
MUBARAKAH was listed on BYDFi in March 2025 but delisted from Gate.io’s Pilot Market in May 2025 due to low traction (Gate.io). The token remains primarily traded on decentralized exchanges like PancakeSwap, with $2.5M 24h volume.

What this means:
This is bearish for MUBARAKAH because inconsistent CEX support limits liquidity and institutional interest. The token’s 71% drop from its all-time high ($0.0108) underscores reliance on retail speculation.

3. Security Challenges (December 2025)

Overview:
A December 2025 hack of Binance co-CEO Yi He’s WeChat account falsely promoted MUBARAKAH, triggering a 200% pump-and-dump (CCN). The attackers netted $55K, damaging the token’s reputation.

What this means:
This is bearish for MUBARAKAH because the incident highlights vulnerability to social engineering and meme-driven manipulation. The token’s RSI (79.6) remains overbought, signaling high downside risk.

Conclusion

MUBARAKAH’s trajectory hinges on meme-driven hype and community resilience, with no technical upgrades or partnerships disclosed. The token faces existential risks from exchange instability and security breaches. How might the community leverage its “blessings” narrative to stabilize adoption beyond speculative pumps?

Deep Dive

1. @cz_binance: “Don’t trust hacked posts” bearish

“Do not buy meme coins from the hacker’s posts. Web2 social media security is not that strong.”
– @cz_binance (9.2M followers · 2.1M impressions · 2025-12-10 09:45 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bearish for MUBARAKAH because Binance’s leadership explicitly disavowed the hack-driven rally, eroding trust in the token’s legitimacy.

2. @Lookonchain: $55K hacker profit mixed

“Attacker spent 19,479 USDT to buy 21.16M MUBARAKAH pre-pump, sold 11.95M during surge for 43,520 USDT – still holds 9.21M tokens ($31K).”
– @Lookonchain (483K followers · 890K impressions · 2025-12-10 22:45 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is neutral – while the exploit highlights manipulation risks, the hacker’s remaining 9.21M tokens could trigger volatility if dumped.

3. @SlowMist: “SIM-swap risks rising” bearish

“Attackers hijacked Yi He’s old WeChat via recycled number – crypto leaders must ditch SMS 2FA.”
– @SlowMist (327K followers · 610K impressions · 2025-12-10 09:35 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bearish long-term as security flaws could deter institutional interest in low-cap meme coins like MUBARAKAH.

Conclusion

The consensus on MUBARAKAH is mixed – while the hack-driven 200% surge (now +27.83% in 24h) shows speculative appetite, CZ’s warnings and $55K exploit profit underscore extreme volatility risks. Watch the hacker’s remaining 9.21M MUBARAKAH ($31K) – a sell-off could reverse gains as quickly as they came.

Deep Dive

1. Development activity analysis

Available records show no GitHub repositories, audit reports, or version history linked to Mubarakah. The project’s CoinMarketCap profile describes it as a cultural meme token without mentioning smart contracts, nodes, or developer tools. Solana blockchain explorers show the token uses a standard SPL token contract without recent modifications.

2. Ecosystem context

The token’s -33.62% 7-day price drop coincides with reduced trading volume (-97.88% 24h change), suggesting declining speculative interest rather than technical developments driving market moves. Competing Solana meme tokens like MAX and AVO show more developer activity through DEX pair updates and liquidity pool adjustments, though these are unrelated to Mubarakah.

Conclusion

Mubarakah appears functionally static with development activity below observable thresholds. How might its cultural narrative evolve to compensate for technical stagnation in a market where 57% of altcoins show rising code commits?