Latest Moonbeam (GLMR) News Update

By CMC AI
05 December 2025 03:34PM (UTC+0)

What are people saying about GLMR?

TLDR

Moonbeam’s community juggles Web3 gaming hype with exchange delisting whiplash. Here’s what’s trending:

  1. 1M GLMR gaming prize pool sparks play-to-prove frenzy

  2. Runtime 3800 upgrade tightens tokenomics with capped inflation

  3. OKX delisting casts shadow despite Upbit listing gains

Deep Dive

1. @MoonbeamNetwork: GLMillionaiRe gaming tournament launch (bullish)

"1M $GLMR is on the line Aug 21-28th... Web3 gaming isn’t the future. It’s happening now."
– @MoonbeamNetwork (Official account · 19 Aug 2025 04:38 PM UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish for GLMR because skill-based tournaments attract genuine user engagement rather than speculative farming. The $1M prize pool (≈2.5% of market cap) could drive short-term demand spikes during the event.

2. @MoonbeamNetwork: Runtime 3800 tokenomics overhaul (neutral)

"Max 60M GLMR/year after supply reaches 1.2B... 100% fee burn implemented."
– @MoonbeamNetwork (Official account · 7 July 2025 04:18 PM UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is neutral near-term – while the 60M annual cap (5% of current supply) reduces dilution risks, full fee burns only become impactful if network usage recovers from its 90-day -61.95% price slump.

3. @genius_sirenBSC: Upbit listing vs. OKX delisting (mixed)

"Upbit listing sparked 12.37% surge... KRW pairs unlocked local liquidity" vs. OKX delisting GLMR/USDT on 8 Sept 2025
– @genius_sirenBSC (80K followers · 8 June 2025 02:31 PM UTC) | OKX notice
View original post
What this means: This creates mixed pressure – while Upbit added ₩2.4B ($1.8M) in KRW liquidity in June, OKX’s removal of GLMR pairs eliminates ≈$236K daily volume (10% of current 24h turnover).

Conclusion

The consensus on Moonbeam is mixed, with bullish gaming adoption catalysts clashing with exchange rotation pressures and macro tokenomics changes. Watch whether the GLMillionaiRe tournament’s August 21-28 run sustains above the $0.025 support level, particularly as RSI(14) sits at 33.87 – nearing oversold territory but lacking clear reversal signals.

What is the latest news on GLMR?

TLDR

Moonbeam navigates ecosystem growth and exchange turbulence. Here are the latest updates:

  1. Ecosystem Collaborations (11 November 2025) – Moonbeam expands cross-chain infrastructure and gaming partnerships.

  2. Gaming Hub Expansion (28 October 2025) – Skill-based tournaments and NFT pets boost Web3 engagement.

  3. OKX Delisting (1 September 2025) – GLMR trading pairs removed, raising liquidity concerns.

Deep Dive

1. Ecosystem Collaborations (11 November 2025)

Overview: Moonbeam’s latest Orbit update highlights partnerships with SubQuery (data indexing), BetterUseBlock (Paraguay tokenization initiative), and N3mus ($1,500 USDC gaming prizes). The network also integrated SurfLayer for EVM-compatible dApps and expanded decentralized storage via Diode Foundation.
What this means: This is bullish for GLMR as cross-chain utility and real-world asset (RWA) adoption could drive developer activity and network usage. However, competition in interoperable infrastructure remains fierce. (Moonbeam Network)

2. Gaming Hub Expansion (28 October 2025)

Overview: Moonbeam launched "Outmine Pets," NFT companions for its Playoutmine game, alongside weekly tournaments via N3mus. The Pets feature auto-mining and battle mechanics, with 3,000 NFTs mintable via Rarible or in-game.
What this means: This is neutral-to-bullish; while gaming activity (149% Q1 2025 transaction growth) supports GLMR demand, speculative NFT dynamics risk short-term volatility. The focus on skill-based rewards aligns with sustainable Web3 gaming trends. (Moonbeam Network)

3. OKX Delisting (1 September 2025)

Overview: OKX removed GLMR/USDT and GLMR/USDⓈ pairs, citing routine reviews. Deposits halted on 1 September, with withdrawals ending 1 December 2025.
What this means: This is bearish for GLMR, as reduced exchange access may dampen retail liquidity. However, Moonbeam’s focus on decentralized ecosystems (e.g., StellaSwap’s $2.3M TVL) could offset centralized exchange reliance. (OKX)

Conclusion

Moonbeam balances ecosystem innovation with exchange-related headwinds, emphasizing cross-chain utility and Web3 gaming. While the OKX delisting poses liquidity risks, strategic partnerships and tokenomics adjustments (e.g., 100% fee burns) aim to stabilize long-term demand. Will gaming and RWA adoption offset centralized exchange outflows?

What is the latest update in GLMR’s codebase?

TLDR

Moonbeam’s latest codebase updates focus on inflation control, cross-chain infrastructure, and fee economics.

  1. Capped Inflation Model (15 August 2025) – Limits GLMR emissions to 60M/year post-1.2B supply.

  2. Cross-Chain Bridge Support (15 August 2025) – Unified bridge framework for Moonbeam/Moonriver.

  3. Full Fee Burn (18 July 2025) – 100% transaction fees permanently burned to reduce supply.


Deep Dive

1. Capped Inflation Model (15 August 2025)

Overview
Moonbeam introduced a capped linear inflation model via Runtime 3800, capping annual GLMR issuance at 60M once total supply reaches 1.2B.

Technical Details
This replaces the previous unbounded inflationary model, aligning with long-term sustainability goals. The cap applies after the 1.2B threshold, slowing supply growth while maintaining staking rewards.

What this means
This is bullish for GLMR because it introduces predictable tokenomics, reducing sell pressure from unchecked inflation while keeping staking incentives intact. (Source)


2. Cross-Chain Bridge Support (15 August 2025)

Overview
Runtime 3800 activated native bridge compatibility between Moonbeam, Moonriver, and testnets, enhancing cross-chain interoperability.

Technical Details
The upgrade integrates Generalized Message Passing (GMP) and Cross-Consensus Messaging (XCM v1), enabling seamless asset/data transfers across Polkadot parachains and external networks like Ethereum.

What this means
This is neutral for GLMR in the short term but bullish long term, as improved connectivity could attract developers building multi-chain dApps, boosting network utility. (Source)


3. Full Fee Burn (18 July 2025)

Overview
Moonbeam shifted to burning 100% of transaction fees (up from 80%), accelerating deflationary pressure.

Technical Details
The update eliminated the 20% fee allocation to the Treasury, redirecting 80% of Parachain Bond Reserve inflation to fund ecosystem grants instead.

What this means
This is bullish for GLMR because it tightens supply dynamics—more usage directly reduces circulating supply, benefiting holders. (Source)


Conclusion

Moonbeam’s codebase updates prioritize sustainable growth (capped inflation), interoperability (cross-chain bridges), and deflationary mechanics (full fee burn). Together, these changes aim to balance developer incentives, user experience, and token value.

How will Moonbeam’s focus on cross-chain infrastructure position it against competitors like Polkadot 2.0?

What is next on GLMR’s roadmap?

TLDR

Moonbeam’s roadmap focuses on gaming, governance, and real-world asset (RWA) expansion.

  1. Gaming Accelerator Launch (Early 2026) – Moonbeam x HELLO Labs program to fund Web3 game development.

  2. RWA Expansion in LATAM (2025–2026) – Doubling down on tokenized assets in Brazil and Paraguay.

  3. Governance Guild Term 3 (2026) – Decentralized voting and staking rewards for delegates.


Deep Dive

1. Gaming Accelerator Launch (Early 2026)

Overview: Moonbeam is collaborating with HELLO Labs to launch an accelerator program for Web3 game developers. Selected projects will receive $30K in funding, TV exposure, and ecosystem access. The initiative aims to scale high-quality, competitive games rather than speculative NFT models (Moonbeam).

What this means: This is bullish for GLMR as it could attract gaming-focused capital and increase network activity. Success depends on onboarding engaging titles and retaining players.


2. RWA Expansion in LATAM (2025–2026)

Overview: Moonbeam is prioritizing real-world asset tokenization in Latin America, partnering with projects like Tokeniza to launch compliant onchain finance products (e.g., digital bonds, tokenized credit). Focus regions include Brazil and Paraguay (Moonbeam).

What this means: This could boost utility for GLMR by linking it to regulated financial instruments. Risks include regulatory hurdles and competition from established RWA platforms.


3. Governance Guild Term 3 (2026)

Overview: The Moonbeam Governance Guild (MGG) will open applications for Term 3, delegating 5M GLMR and 50K MOVR to community representatives. Delegates earn up to 90% of staking rewards while voting on proposals (Moonbeam).

What this means: This strengthens decentralization but risks voter apathy if participation remains low. Increased governance activity could improve investor confidence.


Conclusion

Moonbeam’s roadmap balances ecosystem growth (gaming, RWAs) with decentralized governance, aiming to enhance GLMR’s utility amid a challenging altcoin market. Will its focus on compliant, high-utility applications help reverse its 90%+ yearly price decline?

CMC AI can make mistakes. Not financial advice.