Deep Dive
1. Rebrand to SODAX on Sonic (Oct 2025)
Overview: ICON abandoned its legacy blockchain to adopt Sonic, an EVM-compatible chain, reducing operational costs and focusing on cross-chain DeFi.
The migration involved deploying new relay infrastructure, asset manager contracts, and SDKs for front-end integration. Sonic’s fee monetization model redirects 90% of gas fees to SODAX token holders.
What this means: This is bullish for ICX (now SODA) because EVM compatibility broadens developer access and aligns with Ethereum’s ecosystem. However, legacy ICX holders face a 1:1 token swap, requiring exchange support for liquidity. (Source)
2. Balanced Merger & Governance Removal (Q2 2025)
Overview: ICON merged with DeFi protocol Balanced, retiring its governance model and upgrading BALN tokens to align with SODAX.
New money market contracts replaced bnUSD loans, and PARROT9 now controls the front-end. The merger aims to streamline liquidity across 13 chains, with 50% of Balanced’s fees burning ICX.
What this means: Neutral for ICX due to reduced community governance but bullish long-term via fee-driven deflation (812k ICX burned by Q2 2025). (Source)
3. Cross-Chain Liquidity & Intent-Based Trades (2024–2025)
Overview: Codebase updates enabled cross-chain liquidity pools, Savings Rate integrations, and intent-based trades settling in ~5 seconds.
Balanced Intents soft-launched in December 2024, supporting $5,000 trades with zero slippage. Contracts were audited by Hashlock (EVM) and MoveBit (Sui).
What this means: Bullish for usability, as cross-chain swaps reduce friction, but adoption depends on liquidity depth across chains like Polygon and Stellar. (Source)
Conclusion
ICON’s pivot to Sonic and Balanced integration prioritizes scalability and cross-chain interoperability, but success hinges on CEX support for SODAX and liquidity retention. Will Sonic’s EVM compatibility attract enough developers to offset legacy chain abandonment?