Everything

Prime

Standard

Union

<p>Rating agency Moody’s has given Ripple’s stablecoin RLUSD an investment-grade rating: <strong>A2</strong> long term and <strong>P-1</strong> short term. For you in Germany, that does not change availability for now, because RLUSD still has no authorisation in the European Union as an e-money token under MiCA. The rating assesses the issuer’s creditworthiness, not your access to the token.</p>
<p>It is precisely this gap that makes the news interesting for German investors. A stablecoin can carry an investment-grade rating from one of the three big rating agencies and still not be tradable in the EU. What the rating covers, what it explicitly leaves open and which date in January 2027 matters for holdings is set out here.</p>
<h2 id="what-moody-s-a2-and-p-1-ratings-say-about-rlusd">What Moody’s A2 and P-1 ratings say about RLUSD</h2>
<p>Moody’s has assigned two ratings. <strong>A2</strong> is a long-term rating and sits in investment-grade territory, the upper half of the scale. It is not the top rating: above A2, Moody’s still has Aaa, Aa1, Aa2, Aa3 and A1. <strong>P-1</strong> is the short-term rating and the highest grade Moody’s awards on that scale.</p>
<p>Jack McDonald, senior vice president for <a href="https://cryptoticker.io/en/charts/stablecoins/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">stablecoins</a> at Ripple, called the rating on X the first investment-grade rating Moody’s has given a stablecoin, and P-1 the highest possible short-term rating under the agency’s new stablecoin framework. That characterisation comes from Ripple itself; there is no independent confirmation that it really is the first rating of its kind. McDonald posted the note on the evening of October 27, US Eastern time, which in central Europe was the night of October 28, 2026. Several trade publications accordingly date the rating to October 28.</p>
<p>A rating is an opinion on creditworthiness, not a supervisory seal of approval and not an authorisation. Moody’s assesses how likely it is that the issuer will meet its obligations. Whether a token may be offered in a given jurisdiction is decided by the supervisor there, not the agency.</p>
<h2 id="standard-custody-trust-who-issues-rlusd-and-who-supervises-it">Standard Custody &amp; Trust: who issues RLUSD and who supervises it</h2>
<p>The rating does not apply in the abstract to the RLUSD name but to the liabilities of <strong>Standard Custody &amp; Trust Company</strong>. That is Ripple’s New York-regulated subsidiary that issues the token. The competent supervisor is the New York Department of Financial Services, or NYDFS.</p>
<p>RLUSD is issued natively on two blockchains, the XRP Ledger and Ethereum. Anyone depositing or withdrawing the token via Coinbase can also use Base. That matters for the rating because the liability sits with the issuer, not with the blockchain the token runs on.</p>
<p>In the EU’s MiCA regulation, an <strong>e-money token</strong> is a crypto-asset that replicates the value of an official currency, such as the euro or the US dollar. A dollar stablecoin like RLUSD falls squarely into this category, and that is exactly what an issuer needs its own authorisation for in the EU. An overview of providers and their models is in our <a href="https://cryptoticker.io/en/comparison/stablecoin-list/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">stablecoin comparison</a>.</p>
<h2 id="the-reserve-cash-short-dated-us-treasuries-and-backing-of-around-103-percent">The reserve: cash, short-dated US Treasuries and backing of around 103 percent</h2>
<p>According to reports on the rating, RLUSD is backed by a reserve consisting mainly of cash and short-dated US government securities. Backing is put at around <strong>103 percent</strong> of tokens outstanding. That figure is a point-in-time or target value set by the issuer, not a permanently guaranteed buffer.</p>
<p>BNY is named as the reserve’s main custodian. RLUSD’s market capitalisation stood at <strong>$2.4 billion to $2.5 billion</strong> at the time of the announcement; the sources’ figures fall within this range, one of them based on a BNY statement. By comparison, that is a small fraction of the large dollar stablecoins, whose volumes run into the hundreds of billions.</p>
<figure><img src="https://cryptoticker-strapi-media.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/moodys_rlusd_stablecoin_rating_2_e6e23c6c97.webp" alt="Heavily loaded file trolley in a deserted government corridor at night, at the end of the corridor light falls through a door left ajar" width="1920" height="1080">
 <figcaption>
  Without an entry in ESMA’s EMT register, a dollar stablecoin remains an unauthorised crypto-asset in the EU, regardless of its rating.
 </figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 id="redemption-within-two-business-days-what-the-rating-explicitly-leaves-open">Redemption within two business days: what the rating explicitly leaves open</h2>
<p>According to the coverage, eligible institutional holders can redeem RLUSD at par within two full business days. For retail investors, this direct route to the issuer is generally not available; they sell via a trading venue.</p>
<p>What matters is what the rating does not do. It does not guarantee redemption, it does not prevent a deviation from the dollar price, and it does not mean that banks have cleared the token for their purposes. RLUSD is not a bank deposit protected by deposit insurance. The publicly available documents also do not show what share of the reserve could be sold immediately in the event of heavy redemptions. Moody’s itself points out that the GENIUS Act, which according to the agency is due to take effect in 2027, could strengthen holders’ legal position. That is an expectation for the future, not protection that applies today.</p>
<h2 id="no-emt-entry-why-rlusd-is-not-authorised-in-the-eu">No EMT entry: why RLUSD is not authorised in the EU</h2>
<p>MiCA separates two things that are easily confused: authorisation for a company and approval for a token. Ripple has received both company licences in Luxembourg needed for business in Europe, one as an e-money institution and one as a crypto-asset service provider under MiCA. That allows the company to offer services in the European Economic Area.</p>
<p>The token itself is not covered by this. An e-money token counts as authorised in the EU only once the issuer holds a licence as an e-money institution or credit institution <em>and</em> a white paper exists that is entered in the relevant register at the European securities regulator ESMA. According to available reports, RLUSD lacked this entry as of early October 2026. Ripple has said it can issue the token in the European Economic Area but has not named a launch date for retail customers in the EU.</p>
<p>The consequence is unspectacular and clear-cut. An account held with a MiCA-regulated provider in Germany does not currently lead you to RLUSD. The rating does not change that, because Moody’s and ESMA decide on different questions.</p>
<h2 id="esma-s-january-8-2027-deadline-what-licensed-providers-must-unwind">ESMA’s January 8, 2027 deadline: what licensed providers must unwind</h2>
<p>On October 8, 2026, ESMA published an opinion on stablecoins that do not comply with MiCA. In it, the authority expects national supervisors to ensure that MiCA-licensed providers wind down remaining customer exposure to such tokens as quickly as possible and by <strong>January 8, 2027</strong> at the latest. National supervisors may set an earlier date.</p>
<p>During this transition period, a supervised exit remains permitted: providers may help customers sell, swap or withdraw existing holdings, and may continue to hold and transfer these assets in the meantime. New purchases and any build-up of holdings in unauthorised e-money tokens and asset-referenced tokens are not allowed. According to one report, the opinion explicitly cites USDT as an example of a stablecoin that does not comply with MiCA. ESMA’s <a href="https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-issues-opinion-non-mica-compliant-stablecoins" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">announcement</a> is a supervisory opinion and not directly binding law; it is addressed to supervisors and supervised providers, not to private individuals outside the EU.</p>
<p>This deadline is the truly concrete date in the whole story. It applies to every dollar stablecoin without an EMT entry that you hold with a MiCA-licensed provider, so by no means only to RLUSD. Anyone holding such balances there will be notified by the provider as soon as the unwinding begins.</p>
<figure><img src="https://cryptoticker-strapi-media.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/moodys_rlusd_stablecoin_rating_3_3213736f87.webp" alt="Barrier arm lowering in front of an empty access road at night, red warning light reflected on wet asphalt" width="1920" height="1080">
 <figcaption>
  By January 8, 2027 at the latest, MiCA-licensed providers should no longer have customer exposure to unauthorised stablecoins.
 </figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 id="coinbase-lists-rlusd-which-routes-are-open-and-which-are-not">Coinbase lists RLUSD: which routes are open and which are not</h2>
<p>Alongside the rating, it emerged that Coinbase is adding RLUSD, in its retail app, on Coinbase Exchange and on Coinbase Prime for institutional clients. US dollars and other supported dollar stablecoins can be swapped one-for-one into RLUSD. Deposits and withdrawals run via the XRP Ledger, Ethereum and Base.</p>
<p>The announcement does not say which countries and regions the listing covers. This is where German investors should look closely: a listing at a globally active trading venue says nothing about whether the offer is also available through the same provider’s MiCA-regulated entity in the EU. Experience shows that the European entity’s offering differs from the US one. Whether a trading venue in Germany operates under MiCA supervision is stated in its licence information and in the legal notice of the European entity.</p>
<h2 id="a2-in-context-how-to-read-the-moody-s-scale">A2 in context: how to read the Moody’s scale</h2>
<p>Moody’s rates long-term obligations on a scale from Aaa to C. Everything from Aaa to Baa3 counts as investment grade; below that, speculative grade begins. A2 thus sits in the upper middle: solid, but with a visible gap to the top. For short-term obligations, the scale runs from P-1 through P-2 and P-3 to Not Prime. P-1 is the best grade there.</p>
<p>This combination reads coherently for an issuer whose reserve is invested short term and in liquid assets. The short maturity of the reserve supports the short-term rating, while the long-term rating takes in further questions, such as the legal status of the reserve and the issuer’s insolvency risk. The <a href="https://crypto.news/moodys-ripple-rlusd-a2-p1-stablecoin-rating/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">detailed account of the rating</a> notes that the publicly available announcement does not contain the agency’s full rationale and does not name a date for the next review.</p>
<p>In practice, that means the rating is useful as a pointer to the quality of the reserve and of supervision over the issuer. It is not useful as a statement about how liquid the token is on a given trading day, how widely it is accepted or whether you can legally hold it from Germany.</p>
<h2 id="rlusd-and-the-xrp-price-the-rating-applies-to-the-stablecoin-not-the-coin">RLUSD and the XRP price: the rating applies to the stablecoin, not the coin</h2>
<p>The rating relates to RLUSD. It says nothing about <a href="https://cryptoticker.io/en/prediction/xrp-price-prediction/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">XRP</a>, even though the token is issued on the XRP Ledger. Late on November 1, 2026, XRP traded at $1.24 according to CoinGecko data, down 0.57 percent in 24 hours. Over the past month, XRP lost around 11 percent according to the coverage, while RLUSD held its dollar peg and received the rating.</p>
<p>The reason for this decoupling is structural. A stablecoin can settle payments without any XRP having to be bought or used. If RLUSD grows, demand for XRP does not necessarily grow with it. A widespread counter-argument holds that a stronger stablecoin business supports the infrastructure and thus, indirectly, the whole ecosystem. Both are expectations, and neither has so far been reliably proven.</p>
<h2 id="rlusd-and-mica-january-8-2027-decides-on-eu-access">RLUSD and MiCA: January 8, 2027 decides on EU access</h2>
<p>The bottom line is news that means something for confidence in the issuer and, for now, nothing for access from Germany. Three steps make sense now:</p>
<ol>
 <li><strong>Sort your holdings.</strong> Check which dollar stablecoins sit with your provider and whether it is MiCA-licensed in the EU. If both apply and the token lacks authorisation, the unwinding will affect you. The models and issuers are set out in the <a href="https://cryptoticker.io/en/comparison/stablecoin-list/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">stablecoin comparison</a>.</li>
 <li><strong>Settle custody.</strong> Anyone who wants to hold stablecoins themselves needs a key they can still manage securely in twelve months’ time. You will find the devices and how they differ in the <a href="https://cryptoticker.io/en/comparison/hardware-wallets/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">hardware wallet comparison</a>. Self-custody does not lift the regulatory position, however; it only shifts responsibility for the key.</li>
 <li><strong>Review your trading venue.</strong> Compare which exchanges available in Germany are under MiCA supervision and which stablecoins they will still list after January 8, 2027. The <a href="https://cryptoticker.io/en/comparison/best-regulated-exchange/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">comparison of regulated crypto exchanges</a> sorts providers by licence and domicile.</li>
</ol>
<p>The next hard date is thus set. If RLUSD obtains an EMT entry in the ESMA register by then, the situation for German investors changes fundamentally. If not, RLUSD remains a dollar stablecoin with a good rating and no European door.</p>
<p><em>(As of November 1, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)</em></p>

Moody's rates Ripple's RLUSD A2, yet the stablecoin still lacks MiCA approval in the EU

Table of Contents

CryptoTicker ENG

Other articles published on Nov 3, 2026

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!