Patrick

Solana

Chuck

Republican

<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Senator Cynthia Lummis rejected proposed Clarity Act revisions, saying they weaken protections for software developers without improving enforcement.</li><li>Disputed amendments would remove the Lummis-Grassley provision limiting criminal liability for software developers.</li><li>The Solana Policy Institute urged Senate leaders to hold a Clarity Act vote before the August recess to advance regulatory clarity.</li></ul><p>Senate negotiations over the Clarity Act faced fresh disagreement after a revised proposal emerged, prompting Senator Cynthia Lummis to reject changes affecting software developer protections. According to journalist Eleanor Terrett, prosecutors' groups <a href="https://x.com/EleanorTerrett/status/2082524699159117871?s=20" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">submitted</a> the proposal while the Solana Policy Institute separately urged Senate leaders to schedule a floor vote before the August recess. The developments came as debate continued over criminal liability and digital asset regulation.</p><h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-lummis-pushes-back-on-revised-language-strong"><strong>Lummis Pushes Back On Revised Language</strong></h2><p>According to Eleanor Terrett, <a href="https://cryptofrontnews.com/cynthia-lummis-says-final-clarity-act-arrives-july-4-weekend/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Lummis</a> said the latest proposal did not result from any agreement with her. She added the measure failed to protect developers while also falling short of providing law enforcement with practical enforcement tools.</p><p>The proposal would remove the Lummis-Grassley amendment from the legislation. That amendment clarified software developers could face criminal liability only when they specifically intended to facilitate money laundering.</p><p>Meanwhile, Terrett reported the latest negotiations centered on prosecutors rather than police organizations. Notably, the National Sheriffs' Association, which previously opposed the Clarity Act, did not support the proposed revisions removing developer protections.</p><h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-white-house-and-treasury-dispute-proposal-strong"><strong>White House And Treasury Dispute Proposal</strong></h2><p>According to Politico reporter Jasper Goodman, two major prosecutors' organizations submitted proposed revisions on the disputed <a href="https://cryptofrontnews.com/crypto-industry-urges-senate-to-advance-clarity-act-before-august-recess/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Clarity Act</a> provision to the White House.</p><div id="media_image-7" class="widget widget_media_image cfn-widget cfn-banner cfn-banner-article cfn-banner_728"><a href="https://t.me/EliteFXLabs" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><img width="1280" height="698" src="https://cryptofrontnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/EliteFXLabsBanner-0.webp" class="image wp-image-44226 attachment-full size-full" alt="EliteFXLabs Banner" style="max-width: 100%; height: auto;"></a></div><p>However, Crypto Council Executive Director Patrick Witt rejected claims that the proposal reflected discussions with the administration. He said Senator Catherine Cortez Masto's proposal was "not even close" to the White House position.</p><p>Terrett also reported that Treasury disputed claims the language reflected its input. Instead, Treasury said Washington lobbyists produced the proposal.</p><h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-solana-policy-institute-urges-senate-vote-strong"><strong>Solana Policy Institute Urges Senate Vote</strong></h2><p>Separately, the <a href="https://cryptofrontnews.com/solana-eyes-breakout-above-key-resistance/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Solana</a> Policy Institute sent a July 28 letter to Senate Republican Leader John Thune and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer. Kristin Smith and Miller Whitehouse-Levine urged leadership to bring the Clarity Act to the Senate floor before the August recess.</p><p>The organization said the legislation would establish protections for software developers while providing regulatory certainty for institutions and consumers. It also highlighted developer growth on Solana during 2024 and argued the legislation would give regulators a framework tailored to blockchain-based financial systems while preserving consumer protections.</p><p>The post <a href="https://cryptofrontnews.com/clarity-act-talks-hit-new-snag-as-cynthia-lummis-opposes-changes-to-developer-safeguards/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">CLARITY Act Talks Hit New Snag as Cynthia Lummis Opposes Changes to Developer Safeguards</a> appears on <a href="https://cryptofrontnews.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Crypto Front News</a>. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.</p>

CLARITY Act Talks Hit New Snag as Cynthia Lummis Opposes Changes to Developer Safeguards

Table of Contents

CFN

Other articles published on Jul 30, 2026

Gumi launches $18.3 million crypto fund with SBI and Daiwa Securities

XRPL 3.2.0 Upgrade: What Validators and Users Need to Know

How BitMEX’s March 12 Outage May Have Prevented a Deeper Bitcoin Crash – and Why Bybit Took Over

Aviva Investors launches tokenized fund share class on XRP Ledger

Pi Network Prepares for Final Upgrade with Protocol 26 Launch

Robinhood beats on record revenue as crypto drops 38%

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!