2026

Bitcoin

Real

Daily

<ul>
 <li><strong>Bitcoin closed below its 200-week moving average in June 2026, the first time that’s happened since the last bear market.</strong></li>
 <li><strong>The network’s aggregate realized price sits near $54,000, a level several analysts treat as the deeper floor if the moving average fails.</strong></li>
 <li><strong>21Shares, SkyBridge’s Anthony Scaramucci and Real Vision’s Jamie Coutts all still back the four-year cycle, though they disagree on timing.</strong></li>
 <li><strong>A 2027 US Treasury refinancing wall could delay any recovery even after the technical picture turns.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Bitcoin traded near $64,100 this week, roughly halfway between the low it touched in late June and the $126,100 record it set in October 2025. Down more than 50% from that peak, <strong><a href="https://www.21shares.com/en-us/insights/its-halftime-our-2026-crypto-predictions-six-months-on" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">the token has slipped below $60,000 three separate times this month</a></strong>. None of that is new for Bitcoin. What’s new is that price spent part of June under its 200-week moving average, a line that has marked the bottom of every bear market since 2015. Traders are watching it. So are on-chain analysts. So, increasingly, are fund managers who don’t usually bother with weekly charts.</p>
<h2 id="strong-a-perfect-track-record-built-on-only-four-data-points-strong"><strong>A Perfect Track Record, Built on Only Four Data Points</strong></h2>
<p>The 200-week average smooths four years of closes into a single trend, which filters out the daily noise that makes Bitcoin’s chart nearly unreadable most weeks. <strong><a href="https://www.bitcoinmagazinepro.com/charts/200-week-moving-average-heatmap/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">It has called the bottom of every major cycle</a></strong> in the coin’s history, currently sitting somewhere in the $59,000 to $61,000 range and climbing as recent prices feed into the calculation. The pattern that’s repeated three times: price touches the line, a weekly candle closes back above it, and that reclaim becomes the signal long-term holders wait for.</p>
<p>There’s a catch, though. All four prior instances of this signal working happened while the Federal Reserve was cutting rates or holding near zero. Rates aren’t near zero now. Oil has traded close to $100 a barrel over the Iran conflict. The setup rhymes with history. It doesn’t match it exactly.</p>
<p>Going bar by bar through the 2022 dip turns up 37 weekly closes below the line, not a clean round number, spread across roughly a year with a few brief pokes back above in between. Checked candle by candle against Binance’s weekly BTC/USDT chart and a standard 200-period SMA, not a rounded estimate pulled off someone else’s chart. Bitcoin has managed just one weekly close below it this time. That’s either an early sign the floor is closer than it looks, or simply too small a sample to mean anything yet.</p>
<figure class="wp-caption alignnone"><img src="https://ethnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/BTCUSDT_2026-07-12_19-26-24.png" alt="BTCUSDT chart from 12.07.2026" width="2048" height="1018">
 <figcaption>
  BTC/USD weekly chart, TradingView. Bitcoin closed below its 200-week moving average in June 2026 for the first time since the previous bear market, a level that has marked the bottom of every prior cycle since 2015.
 </figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 id="strong-short-term-buyers-are-still-underwater-near-69-000-strong"><strong>Short-Term Buyers Are Still Underwater Near $69,000</strong></h2>
<p>A moving average tracks price. Realized price tracks cost basis — what each coin last changed hands for, averaged across the network. When market price falls below it, the average holder is underwater, and that’s coincided with every prior cycle low.</p>
<p><strong><a href="https://studio.glassnode.com/charts/111dma-200dma-200wma?a=BTC" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Glassnode currently reads the market as a wide absorption zone</a></strong>, bounded by a $79,000 “true market mean” on top and a $54,900 realized price underneath, with Bitcoin sitting in the middle of that band rather than at either edge. Split the holders up and the picture sharpens. Short-term buyers are still underwater near a $69,000 cost basis, while long-term holders remain in profit against a realized price closer to $49,700. That’s the detail worth sitting with: the people who’d normally panic-sell haven’t been forced out yet.</p>
<table>
 <tbody>
  <tr>
   <th>Metric</th>
   <th>Approx. level</th>
   <th>What it represents</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
   <td>Current BTC price</td>
   <td>$64,100</td>
   <td>Mid-July 2026</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
   <td>October 2025 all-time high</td>
   <td>$126,100</td>
   <td>Post-halving peak</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
   <td>200-week moving average</td>
   <td>~$59,000–$61,000</td>
   <td>Historical cycle-bottom line</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
   <td>Aggregate realized price</td>
   <td>~$54,000–$54,900</td>
   <td>Network-wide cost basis</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
   <td>Long-term holder realized price</td>
   <td>~$49,700</td>
   <td>Deepest floor cited by analysts</td>
  </tr>
 </tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 id="strong-21shares-reversed-its-own-call-scaramucci-and-coutts-still-disagree-on-when-strong"><strong>21Shares Reversed Its Own Call. Scaramucci and Coutts Still Disagree on When.</strong></h2>
<p>21Shares spent early 2026 arguing the four-year cycle was finished. That call didn’t hold up. By June, the firm admitted price action “still looks familiar” and walked the prediction back; its base case now points to $100,000 by year-end rather than a fresh record.</p>
<p>Scaramucci takes a similar view from a different angle. He expects Bitcoin to start rallying late in Q4 2026 into early 2027, <strong><a href="https://www.cnbc.com/video/2026/06/16/watch-cnbcs-full-interview-with-skybridges-anthony-scaramucci.html" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">calling the pattern “very consistent” with prior four-year cycles</a></strong>. What he keeps coming back to isn’t the chart, though. It’s that this drawdown, around 50%, is shallower than the 60-70% drops of past cycles — institutional ETF buying, in his telling, softened the fall.</p>
<p>Coutts is the outlier on urgency, if not on direction. He describes Bitcoin’s action near $63,000 as a “typical garden-variety bear market” and thinks selling pressure is easing, but he won’t call a bottom. His reasoning runs through the bond market more than the chart: <strong><a href="https://cointelegraph.com/features/bitcoin-is-approaching-the-second-half-of-the-bear-market-jamie-coutts" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">the US faces $3.67 trillion in Treasury coupon maturities in 2027</a></strong>, some 36% above the 2020-2025 average. Rolling that through a Fed that’s still shrinking its balance sheet, he argues, is the real constraint on any Bitcoin recovery — not price technicals.</p>
<p>Three different starting points. Same rough conclusion: late 2026 at the earliest, and none of it hinges on Bitcoin’s own chart alone.</p>
<h2 id="strong-the-next-real-signal-is-sitting-in-daily-etf-flow-data-not-on-the-chart-strong"><strong>The Next Real Signal Is Sitting in Daily ETF Flow Data, Not on the Chart</strong></h2>
<p>Skip the prediction and track the confirmation instead: a weekly close back above the 200-week average, held for more than one week. A rejection back under $59,000 puts the $54,000 realized price zone in play next. A break of that would open the door to $49,700, territory this cycle hasn’t touched yet.</p>
<p>The more useful real-time gauge for most readers is ETF flow data, updated daily and free of the guesswork baked into any moving-average chart. Sustained inflows would back the case that institutional demand is soaking up supply faster than these models assume. A slide back into outflows argues for waiting past Q4, no matter how attractive $60,000-something looks on the chart.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ethnews.com/bitcoins-200-week-average-break-tests-the-four-year-cycle/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Bitcoin’s 200-Week Average Break Tests the Four-Year Cycle</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ethnews.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">ETHNews</a>.</p>

Bitcoin’s 200-Week Average Break Tests the Four-Year Cycle

Table of Contents

ETHNews

Other articles published on Jul 12, 2026

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!