Paul Atkins

Chair

DeFi

Gary

<p><img width="1280" height="720" src="https://financefeeds.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Fresh-SEC–CFTC-Plan-Redefines-Token-Rules-and-DeFi-Risk-Exposure.webp" alt="Fresh SEC–CFTC Plan Redefines Token Rules and DeFi Risk Exposure" title="SEC May Revisit Broker and Exchange Rules for Crypto Platforms, Atkins Says 118"></p>
<h2 id="what-did-paul-atkins-say-about-onchain-software">What Did Paul Atkins Say About Onchain Software?</h2> SEC Chair Paul Atkins said the agency needs to clarify how its existing regulatory framework applies to software applications as it considers future rules for onchain financial markets. Speaking Friday at an artificial intelligence expo hosted by the Special Competitive Studies Project, Atkins said software applications do not always fit cleanly into traditional SEC categories such as clearing agency, broker, or exchange. “Software applications today do not always organize themselves neatly along these categorical lines,” Atkins said. “A single protocol can execute a trade, manage collateral, route liquidity, <a href="https://financefeeds.com/versus-trade-launches-new-copy-trading-platform-powered-by-brokeree/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">execute trading strategies</a> through vault structures, and settle the transaction—all within a unified, automated system, often within seconds.” 
<h2 id="why-does-this-matter-for-defi-regulation">Why Does This Matter for DeFi Regulation?</h2> The remarks point to a central problem in crypto oversight: onchain systems often combine functions that traditional markets separate across regulated entities. A DeFi protocol may route trades, manage collateral, settle transactions, and <a href="https://financefeeds.com/dreamcash-begins-rollout-of-trading-platform-with-hyperliquid-integration-via-waitlist-access/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">automate yield strategies</a> without a conventional intermediary. That creates tension with rules written for broker-dealers, exchanges, and clearing agencies. If the SEC applies legacy definitions too broadly, software developers and wallet providers could face rules designed for intermediaries that hold customer assets or execute client orders. Atkins said the SEC should consider notice-and-comment rulemaking to revisit definitions tied to exchanges, clearing agencies, and brokers as they apply to onchain trading systems. He also called for greater clarity around crypto vaults, which are onchain applications that allow users to earn yield passively. 
<h3 id="investor-takeaway">Investor Takeaway</h3>
<div>
 Clearer SEC definitions could reduce legal risk for DeFi developers, wallet providers, and onchain trading systems. The key issue is whether software is treated as infrastructure or as a regulated financial intermediary.
</div>
<h2 id="how-has-the-sec-s-crypto-approach-changed-under-atkins">How Has the SEC’s Crypto Approach Changed Under Atkins?</h2> Atkins’ comments reflect a more crypto-friendly tone at the SEC compared with the agency’s stance under <a href="https://financefeeds.com/ripple-wins-legal-battle-as-sec-drops-appeal-xrp-surges/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">former Chair Gary Gensler</a>, who argued that most cryptocurrencies fell within the commission’s jurisdiction. Since taking office, Atkins has discussed an innovation exemption for tokenized securities and overseen the release of a taxonomy intended to clarify which digital assets may qualify as securities. Last month, the <a href="https://financefeeds.com/sec-lays-out-new-rules-for-how-brokers-must-custody-tokenized-assets/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets</a> released a staff statement saying interfaces such as DeFi wallets would generally not be considered brokers. That view reduces one of the main regulatory concerns for wallet providers and other front-end software tools. 
<h3 id="investor-takeaway">Investor Takeaway</h3>
<div>
 The SEC is moving toward a more software-specific approach to crypto oversight. That could help separate neutral technology tools from platforms that perform regulated financial functions.
</div>
<h2 id="how-did-crypto-industry-groups-react">How Did Crypto Industry Groups React?</h2> Industry groups welcomed the remarks, viewing them as a sign that the SEC may avoid forcing decentralized systems into categories built for traditional <a href="https://financefeeds.com/dtcc-gets-sec-green-light-to-tokenize-dtc-held-assets/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">market infrastructure</a>. The DeFi Education Fund described Atkins’ comments as “powerful” in a post on X. The Hyperliquid Policy Center said it was encouraged to see “a Chairman willing to map these systems to existing legal frameworks on their own terms, rather than force them into legacy categories built for legacy architecture.” Atkins said onchain market structures are often hybrid, combining parts of traditional finance and decentralized finance. He said the SEC should clarify how it views this range of models through public rulemaking, using exemptive authority where necessary. For crypto firms, the practical question is whether future rules give developers and protocols a workable path to compliance without treating every software layer as a broker, exchange, or clearing agency.

SEC May Revisit Broker and Exchange Rules for Crypto…

Table of Contents

FinanceFeeds

Other articles published on May 8, 2026

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!