Arbitrum

USDC

Discord

Hyperliquid

<p>Hyperliquid is pushing back after a wave of claims questioned its solvency, transparency, and internal controls. In a detailed public response, the perpetuals trading platform said several accusations circulating online were based on incorrect or misunderstood information.</p>
<p><em>“Hyperliquid is built on a foundation of onchain transparency,”</em> <a href="https://x.com/HyperliquidX/status/2003045600657334570?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">the team wrote</a>, addressing the claims one by one.</p>
<p>The response comes as traders across the crypto market demand clearer proof of reserves and stronger governance from major exchanges.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-why-the-solvency-claim-came-down-to-usdc">Why the Solvency Claim Came Down to USDC</h2>
<p>One of the most serious accusations claimed Hyperliquid was undercollateralized by $362 million. According to Hyperliquid, this conclusion came from leaving out native HyperEVM USDC balances.</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
 <p><em>“Every dollar is accounted for; the author failed to count native HyperEVM USDC,”</em> the platform stated.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hyperliquid explained that when both the Arbitrum bridge USDC and native HyperEVM USDC are included, total balances amount to <strong>$4.351 billion</strong>, matching user balances on HyperCore. The team emphasized that this verification is fully onchain and independently checkable.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="testnet-functions-sparked-confusion">Testnet Functions Sparked Confusion</h2>
<p>Another claim suggested Hyperliquid could retroactively manipulate trading volume. The platform said this was based on testnet-only code that cannot be executed on mainnet.</p>
<p><em>“Testnet functions are exactly that – testnet only for testing,”</em> Hyperliquid said, adding that these features are used to test complex fee and volume mechanics before deployment.</p>
<p>According to the team, every trade and volume figure on mainnet can be verified by anyone running a node.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="no-special-privileges-or-hidden-controls">No Special Privileges or Hidden Controls</h2>
<p>Hyperliquid also rejected claims that certain users receive fee exemptions or that insiders could influence the HYPE airdrop.</p>
<p><em>“There are no such mechanisms to distort fees,”</em> the platform stated, noting that fees, trades, and the full HYPE genesis distribution are all available onchain.</p>
<p>Addressing concerns around governance and control, Hyperliquid clarified that chain freezes only occur during planned network upgrades, similar to hard forks on other blockchains.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-internal-rules-aim-to-strengthen-trust">Internal Rules Aim to Strengthen Trust</h2>
<p>Alongside its technical rebuttal, Hyperliquid pointed to steps taken to improve trust. The platform has banned employees, contractors, and team members from trading $HYPE to avoid conflicts of interest, following reports of a former employee shorting the token.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter">
 <div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
  <blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
   <p>Hyperliquid Reaffirms Strict HYPE Trading Rules<a href="https://twitter.com/HyperliquidX?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">@HyperliquidX</a> team members stated on Discord that all personnel affiliated with Hyperliquid Labs, including employees and contractors, are subject to strict conduct policies regarding the <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%24HYPE&amp;src=ctag&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">$HYPE</a>. These include a complete ban on… <a href="https://t.co/0GAy6SG9pM" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">pic.twitter.com/0GAy6SG9pM</a></p>— ME (@MetaEraHK) <a href="https://twitter.com/MetaEraHK/status/2002995015664939349?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">December 22, 2025</a>
  </blockquote>
 </div>
</figure>
<p>Hyperliquid also confirmed that <a href="https://x.com/HYPERDailyTK/status/2003047360801488973" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Assistance Fund tokens</a> – around 11% of circulating supply – have been formally recognized as permanently burned through validator consensus, removing long-standing supply concerns.</p>
<p>Hyperliquid is leaning heavily on one message: its entire state is onchain, visible, and verifiable by anyone who wants to look.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-faqs">FAQs</h2>
<div class="schema-faq wp-block-yoast-faq-block">
 <div class="schema-faq-section" id="faq-question-1766407351217">
  <strong><strong>What is Hyperliquid saying about its solvency?</strong></strong>
  <p>Hyperliquid says it is fully solvent, explaining that earlier claims ignored native HyperEVM USDC, which makes total reserves match user balances onchain.</p>
 </div>
 <div class="schema-faq-section" id="faq-question-1766407486311">
  <strong><strong>Why did these claims gain traction so quickly among traders?</strong></strong>
  <p>Concerns spread fast because recent exchange failures have made traders more sensitive to reserve gaps and governance risks. Any unclear onchain data can amplify fear before technical details are fully understood.</p>
 </div>
 <div class="schema-faq-section" id="faq-question-1766407499572">
  <strong><strong>Could this controversy affect broader expectations for crypto exchanges?</strong></strong>
  <p>Yes. It reinforces pressure on both centralized and decentralized platforms to present reserves and system controls in ways that are easily interpretable by non-technical users.</p>
 </div>
</div>

Hyperliquid Fires Back at Solvency and Integrity Claims, Cites Onchain Proof

Table of Contents

CoinPedia News

Other articles published on Dec 22, 2025

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!