Bitcoin

when

<p style="text-align: justify">You can also read this news on BH NEWS: <a href="https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/bitcoin-ordinals-enthusiast-reclaims-lost-cash-following-nft-overpayment-error" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Bitcoin Ordinals Enthusiast Reclaims Lost Cash Following NFT Overpayment Error</a><br></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">An investor dealing with <a href="https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/bitcoin-surges-past-52000-but-faces-pressure-from-upcoming-large-sales" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Bitcoin</a> Ordinals NFTs recently retrieved their funds after mistakenly overpaying for a non-fungible token (<a href="https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/azuki-dao-changes-brand-and-creates-controversial-nft-collection" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">NFT</a>) on the Bitcoin blockchain. The investor had believed they secured an NFT for roughly $1,287, but it turned out to be ten times that amount at $12,877. Sharing their blunder openly, they aimed to remind peers to verify details carefully in <a href="https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/key-developments-in-the-cryptocurrency-market" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">cryptocurrency</a> dealings.</p>
<h2 id="costly-confusion-over-nft-purchase">Costly Confusion Over NFT Purchase</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify">The investor discovered post-transaction that they had actually paid 0.21 BTC—much higher than the intended 0.021 BTC. They publicly confessed their costly error, inadvertently alerting the seller of the NFT, Dan Anderson. Anderson responded to the investor’s post, recognizing it as his listing and offering to repurchase the NFT at the inflated price, citing his own mistake in the initial listing.</p>
<h2 id="return-of-funds-after-community-intervention">Return of Funds After Community Intervention</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify">Anderson’s offer to repurchase the NFT for 0.21 BTC was accepted, and the investor was made whole again. The NFT was subsequently put back on the market for the correct amount. This incident underscores the importance of careful transaction verification, especially given other cases where individuals have kept funds received in error. An Australian crypto exchange recently faced a similar issue when a user retained $653,000 mistakenly sent to them.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Furthermore, in 2022, a couple failed to return $10.5 million sent by Crypto.com, leading to legal repercussions. Thevamanogari Manivel faced 18 months of community correction, and her husband will serve six months of community work after pleading guilty to theft in 2023. These events highlight the risks and ethical dilemmas present in the digital asset space.</p>
<h5><span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:16px">The post first appeared on BH NEWS: </span> <a href="https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/bitcoin-ordinals-enthusiast-reclaims-lost-cash-following-nft-overpayment-error" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Bitcoin Ordinals Enthusiast Reclaims Lost Cash Following NFT Overpayment Error</a></h5>

Bitcoin Ordinals Enthusiast Reclaims Lost Cash Following NFT Overpayment Error

Table of Contents

BH NEWS

Other articles published on Mar 1, 2024

Arcblock (ABT) Price Prediction 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029 and 2030

Novogratz Predicts BTC Pullback Before New Highs

State Officials Contest SEC Overreach in Kraken Cryptocurrency Litigation

Ethereum Price Prediction: ETH Pumps 14% In A Week, But Experts Say This New Green AI Token May 10X

Cardano (ADA) Community Excitement Peaks in DeeStream (DST) Presale Surge; Bitcoin (BTC) Holds St...

Bitcoin ETFs set for ‘even bigger wave’ in next few months: Bitwise

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!