2024

Bitcoin

<p>XRP advocate <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/xrp-advocate-john-deaton-takes-center-stage/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">John Deaton,</a> known for his outspoken criticism of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has once again voiced his dissatisfaction with the regulatory body’s stance on cryptocurrency.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In a recent development, Deaton accused the SEC of lacking integrity rather than intelligence in its approach to digital asset regulation.</p>
<p>This comes in response to comments made by Stuart Alderoty, Chief Legal Officer at Ripple, who criticized the SEC’s legal arguments, referring to the historic Howey case.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="the-oranges-analogy-and-sec-s-crypto-position">The “Oranges” analogy and SEC’s crypto position</h2>
<p>In a<a href="https://twitter.com/JohnEDeaton1/status/1748437798623785175" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"> tweet,</a> Alderoty called the SEC’s legal arguments “laughable,” specifically highlighting their use of an analogy involving “oranges” during the Howey oral argument. The SEC likened investing in cryptocurrencies to investing in an “ecosystem of oranges.”</p>
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter">
 <div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
  <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
   <p lang="en" dir="ltr">We know the same argument equally applies to buying <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BTC?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">#BTC</a> <br><br>Guess what the SEC lawyer said about buying <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Bitcoin?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">#Bitcoin</a> – and why it’s not a security? <br><br>He said <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BTC?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">#BTC</a> doesn’t have a network.<br><br>SEC enforcement lawyers are not that stupid. They just lack integrity. It’s as if they “lack a… <a href="https://t.co/vGV4sdmmaQ" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">https://t.co/vGV4sdmmaQ</a></p>— John E Deaton (@JohnEDeaton1) <a href="https://twitter.com/JohnEDeaton1/status/1748437798623785175?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">January 19, 2024</a>
  </blockquote>
  <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 </div>
</figure>
<p>According to this analogy, when an investor purchases a cryptocurrency, they effectively become part of a larger network that the cryptocurrency is embedded within. This line of reasoning seeks to demonstrate that crypto tokens are not merely collectibles but rather keys to participation in an underlying business enterprise.</p>
<p>Deaton seized the opportunity to shed light on what he perceives as the SEC’s favoritism towards Bitcoin. He pointed out the inconsistency in the SEC’s classification of cryptocurrencies, highlighting that Bitcoin is considered a non-security while several leading altcoins, including XRP, ADA, and SOL, are labeled as securities.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The SEC’s justification for this distinction was their assertion that “Bitcoin doesn’t have a network.” Deaton responded to this by stating, “SEC enforcement lawyers are not that stupid. They just lack integrity. It’s as if they lack a faithful allegiance to the law.”</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="diverging-from-established-laws">Diverging from established laws</h2>
<p>Alderoty’s tweet also emphasized that the<a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/sec-crypto-regulations-reflect-transparency/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"> SEC’</a>s views on cryptocurrencies have strayed far from established legal principles. He expressed concerns about the potential harm and damage caused by the SEC’s policies to the broader crypto ecosystem. He noted that, if not for the potentially adverse consequences, the SEC’s approach to cryptocurrency regulation could be considered a matter of amusement.</p>
<p>One of the primary sources of contention in the cryptocurrency community is the inconsistency in the SEC’s approach to different digital assets. While Bitcoin enjoys the status of being labeled a non-security, other cryptocurrencies face classification as securities.&nbsp;</p>
<p>This differentiation has raised questions about the criteria used by the SEC for determining the regulatory status of various digital assets.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="sec-s-justification-for-bitcoin-s-non-security-status">SEC’s justification for Bitcoin’s non-security status</h2>
<p>The SEC’s argument that Bitcoin doesn’t have a network, which contributed to its non-security classification, has been met with skepticism. Many in the crypto community argue that Bitcoin indeed operates on a robust and decentralized network, much like other cryptocurrencies.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The lack of clarity and transparency in the SEC’s decision-making process has led to further frustration among market participants.</p>
<p>The ongoing ambiguity and lack of clear regulatory guidelines for cryptocurrencies have been a consistent point of criticism by industry participants and advocates. Without a well-defined framework, the cryptocurrency market remains susceptible to regulatory uncertainty, potentially hindering its growth and innovation.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="calls-for-clarity-and-consistency">Calls for clarity and consistency</h2>
<p>In response to the regulatory challenges and inconsistencies surrounding cryptocurrencies, advocates like <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/john-deaton-doubts-settlement-in-ripple-case/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">John Deaton</a> continue to call for greater clarity and consistency in the SEC’s approach.&nbsp;</p>
<p>They argue that a more comprehensive regulatory framework is essential to foster a healthy and thriving crypto ecosystem while providing investors with the confidence they need to participate in the market.</p>
<p>As the cryptocurrency industry continues to evolve and mature, regulatory agencies, including the SEC, are facing increasing pressure to adapt their approach. Achieving a balance between investor protection and fostering innovation remains a complex challenge.&nbsp;</p>
<p>However, it is clear that stakeholders across the cryptocurrency landscape are eager to engage in a constructive dialogue with regulators to shape a regulatory environment that is both fair and conducive to growth.</p>

XRP advocates clash with SEC over crypto regulation integrity

Table of Contents

Cryptopolitan_News

Other articles published on Jan 20, 2024

Chainlink (LINK) Turns Bullish. Another Rally Ahead?

Here’s Why Bitcoin (BTC) Price Is Falling After Spot Bitcoin ETFs: CryptoQuant

3 Tokens With 30X Growth Potential in 2024

Ripple Counters SEC’s Latest Discovery Request in Ongoing Legal Battle

Dogecoin (DOGE) Struggles While Ethereum (ETH) Experiences a Price Breakout – Over 11,000 Users S...

Highly Optimistic About ORDI? Experts Suggest Considering These Two Alternative Cryptocurrencies ...

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!