JUST

Bitcoin

Million

<div class="fintechs">
 <div class="wp-block-image">
  <figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img decoding="async" width="640" height="360" src="https://cdn.thebittimes.com/images/2023/11/24/8d0793a4c1b5aa0abecc4eb3b6d727d0.webp" alt="" class="wp-image-42875" srcset="https://cdn.thebittimes.com/images/2023/11/24/b7aead5a52d39ddf42fcd98d85dc5179.webp 750w, https://cdn.thebittimes.com/images/2023/11/24/b7aead5a52d39ddf42fcd98d85dc5179.webp 300w, https://cdn.thebittimes.com/images/2023/11/24/b7aead5a52d39ddf42fcd98d85dc5179.webp 267w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" data-recalc-dims="1">
  </figure>
 </div>
 <p class=""><strong>In a jaw-dropping Bitcoin transaction blunder, a user inadvertently set a new record by paying a staggering $3.1 million fee for a $2.1 million transfer. This colossal fee has stunned the cryptocurrency community, breaking all previous records for a single Bitcoin transaction in U.S. dollar terms.</strong></p>
 <figure class="wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter">
  <div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
   <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
    <p lang="en" dir="ltr">JUST IN: A massive $3,146,245 (83.65 BTC) transaction fee was just paid in order to send a 139.32 #Bitcoin transaction. <br><br>This means the sender only received 55.76 $BTC. The future of finance! pic.twitter.com/7FHyVk2k1P</p>— WhaleWire (@WhaleWire) November 23, 2023
   </blockquote>
  </div>
 </figure>
 <h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-a-costly-mistake-strong"><strong>A Costly Mistake</strong></h2>
 <p class="">On November 23, at 9:59 a.m. UTC, a Bitcoin user initiated a transfer of 139.42 BTC, equivalent to approximately $5.2 million, to another wallet. However, in a costly oversight, they accidentally attached a transaction fee of 83.6 BTC, which amounted to a staggering $3.1 million. Consequently, the recipient received only 55.77 BTC, valued at around $2.1 million.</p>
 <p class="">This incident unfolded on the Bitcoin blockchain, quickly making headlines due to its astonishing magnitude. The user’s wallet address, “bc1qn3d… well,” carried out the transfer, with the funds destined for the address “bc1qyf…km36t4.” Surprisingly, both the sender’s and the recipient’s addresses were relatively new, with the sender’s address activated just earlier that day, while the recipient’s address dated back to October 16.</p>
 <h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-unintended-consequences-strong"><strong>Unintended Consequences</strong></h2>
 <p class="">The transaction was processed by the mining pool AntPool and recorded in block 818,087, according to blockchain explorer Blockchain. As of writing, AntPool has remained tight-lipped about the transaction and has not yet commented.</p>
 <p class="">This incident resembles a previous case in September, where crypto services provider Paxos accidentally paid a $500,000 fee for a Bitcoin transfer worth only $2,000. Fortunately, in that instance, the mining pool F2Pool agreed to reimburse Paxos for the fee, rectifying the costly mistake.</p>
 <p class="">However, in this recent case, the identity of the entity behind the colossal fee remains shrouded in mystery, and it remains uncertain whether AntPool will take a similar approach to Paxos and return the fee. The decision to do so would likely depend on AntPool’s internal payout policies and its commitment to sharing transaction fees with its miners.</p>
 <h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-unveiling-the-technicalities-strong"><strong>Unveiling the Technicalities</strong></h2>
 <p class="">This incident also shed light on the technical aspects of Bitcoin transactions. The sender might not have been aware of the non-cancellation of replacement fees policy, leading to the accidental $3.1 million transaction fee. Replace-by-fee (RBF) allows users to replace an unconfirmed transaction in the mempool with another transaction that offers a higher fee, expediting its approval and inclusion in the Bitcoin blockchain.</p>
 <p class="">A mempool developer, Mononaut, suggested that the user behind this transaction may have repeatedly attempted to replace the fees in hopes of cancelling the transaction. Each replacement incrementally increased the fee, ultimately leading to the astronomical $3.1 million fee.</p>
 <p class="">While this incident shares similarities with the Paxos case, the fate of the overpaid fee ultimately hinges on AntPool’s policies. The cryptocurrency community eagerly awaits any potential resolution and the lessons that can be gleaned from this costly mishap.</p>
 <p class="">In the world of cryptocurrencies, where the slightest error can result in substantial financial consequences, users are reminded of the importance of understanding the intricacies of the blockchain and transaction processes to avoid unintentional and costly mistakes.</p> 
</div>
<p>Source: <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://thebittimes.com/bitcoin-blunder-3-1-million-fee-for-a-2-1-million-transfer-tbt71417.html">https://thebittimes.com/bitcoin-blunder-3-1-million-fee-for-a-2-1-million-transfer-tbt71417.html</a></p>

Bitcoin Blunder: $3.1 Million Fee for a $2.1 Million Transfer

Table of Contents

TheBitTimes

Other articles published on Nov 23, 2023

FTX Native Token FTT Surges Over 20% After CZ Leaves Binance

Singaporean takes helm at Binance as CZ steps aside

Bitcoin Is Relatively Stable, With A Price Above $35,400

Recruiting Specialists in the Blockchain Industry: Challenges, tips, strategies

Ripple CTO backs Elon Musk amid social media controversy

Cryptocurrency Move from the Well-established Bank Managing 215 Billion Dollars!

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!