Satoshi

Security

<figure> 
 <figcaption>
 Cover image via <a href="https://u.today/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">U.Today</a> 
 </figcaption> 
</figure> 
Controversial statements recently emerged from U.S. Congressman Brad Sherman regarding the court ruling on <a href="https://twitter.com/EleanorTerrett/status/1684211976581292036" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Ripple</a> (XRP), provoking a heated debate within the cryptocurrency community. Following a significant legal victory for Ripple, where <a href="https://u.today/xrp-price-nears-crucial-turning-point-here-are-possible-scenarios" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">XRP</a> was formally established as a nonsecurity asset, Sherman branded the court's decision as "ridiculous." 
Sherman, known for his pro-SEC stance, was critical of the judge's ruling, contending that XRP is always a security, contrary to the court's interpretation that it can sometimes be a security and sometimes not. His viewpoint counters the court's nuanced understanding of XRP's multifaceted nature, as both a cryptocurrency and a technology for fast, low-cost international money transfers. 
This binary view of <a href="https://u.today/xrp-needed-this-pattern-badly-but-failed-heres-why" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">XRP</a> as solely a security asset sparked intense backlash from the cryptocurrency community. Critics argued that Sherman's statements reflect a lack of comprehensive understanding of the complexity of digital assets and their various applications. 
The congressman also made a contentious comparison between Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, and Charles Ponzi, the infamous fraudster known for the Ponzi scheme. This comparison has been seen as a further reflection of Sherman's skeptical view toward cryptocurrencies. 
<a href="https://u.today/xrp-already-lost-half-of-its-gains" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">card</a> 
The court ruling favoring Ripple is considered a significant win for the company in its ongoing lawsuit against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC had alleged that Ripple conducted an unregistered securities offering by selling XRP. However, the court determined that XRP has both security and nonsecurity attributes, complicating its classification under existing securities laws. 
The response from Congressman Sherman underscores the ongoing debate around the classification of cryptocurrencies under existing regulatory frameworks. His viewpoint that XRP should be considered strictly as a security could limit the token's potential applications and stifle innovation in the burgeoning field of digital currencies.

Pro-SEC Congressman Calls Ripple Court Ruling Ridiculous, Says XRP Is Security

U_Today

Other articles published on Jul 27, 2023

Decentraland Price Prediction: MANA Price Breaks Upward Channel

Announcement of TRY Parity for This Altcoin From Bitcoin Exchange Binance!

WEMIX and NILE participate in HELLO NFT! 2023

QRL's Second Phase Grants Program Launches Imminently, Enhancing Resilience to Quantum Threats

Dogecoin Surpasses Cardano as Elon Musk Fuels Speculations

Robert Kennedy Jr. Admits to purchasing Bitcoin

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!