LooksRare (LOOKS) Price Prediction

Deep Dive

1. Exchange Delistings (Bearish Impact)

Overview: OKX and ONUS delisted LOOKS in November 2025, citing liquidity and compliance concerns. OKX handled ~$1.4B daily volume pre-delisting, and ONUS cited reliance on OKX’s liquidity. Post-delisting, LOOKS’ 24h volume dropped 13.8% to $1.67M by December 2025.
What this means: Reduced exchange access limits buyer pools and amplifies volatility. Historical delistings (e.g., DEP, NC) saw 20–40% price drops within a week. LOOKS’ turnover ratio of 0.984 suggests thin liquidity, raising downside risk.

2. NFT Market Maturation (Mixed Impact)

Overview: The NFT sector’s 2024–2025 shift toward high-value, curated assets (up 12% in avg. sale price) contrasts with LooksRare’s focus on trader incentives. Competitors like Blur (0% fees) and OpenSea’s OS2 multichain expansion intensify pressure.
What this means: LooksRare’s 0.5% fees and gas savings may retain power users, but platform upgrades are critical. Without adoption of Layer 2 solutions (adopted by SuperRare/Foundation), LOOKS risks losing relevance in a quality-driven market.

3. Tokenomics & Staking Dynamics (Bearish Bias)

Overview: 44.1% of LOOKS supply is allocated to volume rewards, with 10% held by the team. Staking APY remains at 39.31%, but rewards are diluted as trading activity declines. Only 27% of circulating supply is staked, per November 2025 data.
What this means: Low staking participation increases sell-side pressure. Team unlocks (vested through 2026) could add 100M+ tokens annually—equivalent to ~6% of current supply—further suppressing prices if unmanaged.

Conclusion

LOOKS’ path hinges on reversing exchange exodus and adapting to NFT market trends. While oversold conditions (RSI 27) hint at a technical bounce, structural challenges in liquidity and tokenomics dominate.
Can staking incentives offset looming supply unlocks? Monitor daily active users and exchange relisting bids.