Latest GMX (GMX) News Update

Deep Dive

1. @GMX_IO: Post-hack rebound strategy bullish

"Over 34,500 GMX tokens repurchased this week... Staking APR at 22.14%"
– @GMX_IO (226K followers · 667K+ impressions · 2025-11-28 15:34 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish for GMX because aggressive buybacks and high staking yields signal protocol confidence while incentivizing long-term holding despite July’s $40M exploit.

2. @johnmorganFL: Technical breakout potential bullish

"GMX now at $17.57, Bollinger Bands tightening – volatility might be easing"
– @johnmorganFL (35K followers · 49K impressions · 2025-08-11 13:54 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish as tightening volatility often precedes major price moves, with traders watching for a sustained break above $18 to confirm momentum.

3. @Assemble_io: Competitive pressures bearish

"Hyperliquid surpasses GMX in open interest – $10.6B vs. sub-$10M"
– @Assemble_io (28K followers · 922K+ impressions · 2025-12-04 10:56 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bearish as it highlights GMX’s declining market share in perpetual trading, attributed to Hyperliquid’s faster L1 architecture attracting high-volume traders.

Conclusion

The consensus on GMX is mixed – while its security response and staking mechanics rebuilt trust post-hack, protocol competitiveness remains under scrutiny. Watch the GLP minting activity (currently paused on V1) and V2 adoption rates for signals of whether GMX can reclaim its DeFi derivatives leadership. Does the 22% staking APR justify the platform risks?

Deep Dive

1. Hyperliquid Overtakes GMX in Open Interest (4 December 2025)

Overview:
Hyperliquid, a fully on-chain perpetuals exchange, surpassed GMX with $10.6B in open interest, driven by its low-latency Layer 1 architecture. GMX’s pool-based model has faced slippage and slower execution, leading traders—especially whales—to migrate.

What this means:
This is bearish for GMX’s market share, as Hyperliquid’s CEX-like performance challenges GMX’s core value proposition. However, GMX’s revenue-sharing model (via GMX and GLP tokens) could stabilize long-term loyalty if liquidity rebounds.
(Bitrue)

2. DAO Votes on Committee Budgets (1 December 2025)

Overview:
GMX DAO concluded voting on budgets for its core committees, focusing on protocol upgrades, security audits, and liquidity incentives. The move aims to streamline governance ahead of potential V3 upgrades.

What this means:
Neutral to bullish, as structured funding could accelerate innovation. However, voter turnout (~12% of tokenholders) signals lingering apathy, raising questions about decentralization efficacy.
(CoinDesk)

3. Trader’s $115M GMX Short Bets (19 November 2025)

Overview:
A trader opened $115M in short positions on GMX after losing $168M on Hyperliquid, reflecting GMX’s liquidity depth for high-stakes speculation. The positions remain open with $1.4M in unrealized gains.

What this means:
Bullish for GMX’s fee revenue but bearish for price stability, as concentrated shorts could amplify volatility. The activity underscores GMX’s appeal to leveraged traders despite rising competition.
(Bitget)

Conclusion

GMX navigates a shifting DeFi landscape, balancing governance upgrades against Hyperliquid’s architectural edge. While its DAO seeks operational efficiency, trader behavior and open interest trends will test its resilience. Can GMX’s revenue-sharing model offset competitive pressures, or will newer protocols redefine the on-chain perps arena?

Deep Dive

1. Multichain Expansion (Q1 2026)

Overview: GMX plans to enable trading from any EVM-compatible chain (e.g., Solana, Binance Chain) via LayerZero interoperability. Users can access Arbitrum/Avalanche liquidity without bridging assets, reducing friction.
What this means: Bullish for adoption, as it taps into new user bases and chains. Risks include smart contract complexity and cross-chain security audits.

2. Cross-Margin Support (Q1 2026)

Overview: Traders will share collateral across positions, using unrealized profits from one trade as margin for others. This reduces liquidation risks and boosts capital efficiency.
What this means: Bullish for high-frequency traders and institutional users. Bearish if poor risk management leads to cascading liquidations during volatility.

3. Aggregated Markets (Mid-2026)

Overview: ETH/USD markets (e.g., WETH-USDC, USDC-USDC) will merge under a single interface, simplifying trader decisions while maintaining separate liquidity pools.
What this means: Neutral for liquidity providers but bullish for UX—reduced fragmentation could attract retail traders.

Conclusion

GMX is prioritizing cross-chain scalability and capital efficiency to solidify its position as a DeFi perpetuals leader. While technical execution risks persist, successful rollout could drive protocol revenue and token utility. How might GMX balance innovation with security post-$40M July 2025 exploit?

Deep Dive

1. V1 Exploit Patch (9 July 2025)

Overview:
A re-entrancy attack on GMX V1’s Arbitrum GLP pool drained ~$42M. The exploit manipulated short position pricing calculations, allowing attackers to artificially inflate GLP token values.

Details:
The vulnerability stemmed from immediate updates to globalShortAveragePrices when opening short positions. Attackers exploited this via repeated contract calls within a single transaction. GMX paused V1 trading/minting, offered a $5M bounty, and recovered most funds. Forks were advised to disable leverage features via Vault.setIsLeverageEnabled(false) to mitigate risks.

What this means:
This is bullish for GMX because the swift patch and transparent recovery process restored confidence. However, the incident highlights lingering risks in legacy codebases. (Source)

2. Multichain Launch (30 September 2025)

Overview:
GMX expanded to Base (Coinbase’s L2) via LayerZero, enabling cross-chain perpetual trading without manual bridging.

Details:
The update unified liquidity across EVM chains, allowing users to trade 90+ assets with sub-1-second execution. It abstracted gas fees via GMX Express and integrated with networks like Binance Chain and Ethereum.

What this means:
This is neutral-to-bullish as it boosts accessibility but increases code complexity. The move targets institutional adoption but requires rigorous cross-chain security audits. (Source)

Conclusion

GMX’s codebase evolved to address critical vulnerabilities while scaling cross-chain capabilities. The V1 patch emphasized security urgency, while Multichain reflects strategic growth. However, can GMX balance rapid expansion with maintaining audit rigor in its decentralized architecture?