Latest Gains Network (GNS) News Update

Deep Dive

1. @GainsNetwork_io: Trick or Trade Bonanza 🎃 Bullish

"$400K in rewards [...] 55k+ $GNS burned today – volume, burn, rewards, repeat."
– @GainsNetwork_io (61.5K followers · 1457 media · 30 October 2025 10:49 PM UTC)
View original post
What this means: The Arbitrum-based contest drives trading activity, directly accelerating GNS burns via protocol fees. With 55k tokens burned daily (0.2% of supply), this creates deflationary pressure amid low liquidity ($1.77M 24h volume).

2. @GainsNetwork_io: Road to 1 GNS Accelerates 🔥 Bullish

"10 million gone. 29 million left."
– @GainsNetwork_io (61.5K followers · 1457 media · 5 August 2025 06:49 PM UTC)
View original post
What this means: Burns have reduced supply by 27% since inception, with 442k GNS incinerated in 30 days pre-contest. At current rates, circulating supply could drop below 28M by December 2025, potentially magnifying volatility.

3. @ACInvestorBlog: Flag Pattern Targets $2.50 📈 Bullish

"Bull flag breakout [...] measured move ~$2.50. GNS has history of squeezes – ran from 3 to 80 in 2023."
– @ACInvestorBlog (209K followers · 13 September 2025 1:00 PM UTC)
View original post
What this means: Technical traders are frontrunning the $1.85 pivot level, though GNS faces resistance at its 200D MA (~$1.90). The call references January 2023’s 2,500% pump, but current liquidity is 92% lower than peak levels.

4. @DonnahueGeorge: Buyback Suspicions 🚨 Bearish

"GNS Group buying back shares [...] Bad actors concerned? @SECGov @FBI"
– @DonnahueGeorge (45.3K followers · 24 September 2025 12:38 PM UTC)
View original post
What this means: Critics allege opaque financial practices, though no formal investigations are confirmed. The token’s 90-day correlation with NASDAQ (-0.32) suggests traders view GNS as a high-beta “stonk” proxy.

Conclusion

The consensus on GNS is mixed, balancing aggressive tokenomics against regulatory skepticism. While burns and trading incentives create reflexive demand loops, the 90%+ drawdown from ATHs and low liquidity amplify risks. Watch the burn-to-volume ratio – sustaining >0.5% daily burns relative to volume could signal sustainable deflation, while dips below 0.2% may expose sell-side fragility.

Deep Dive

1. Trick or Trade Contest Ends (19 November 2025)

Overview: Gains Network’s Halloween trading competition on Arbitrum distributed $400K in rewards, funded by protocol reserves and past ARB grants. The event aimed to consolidate liquidity on Arbitrum, where gTrade handles ~60% of its volume. Traders competed in P&L and volume categories, with USDC as mandatory collateral.

What this means: While the contest drove a 60% spike in daily active wallets (450+ average), GNS price dipped 4.6% post-event. Short-term hype often clashes with sell pressure from reward claims, but the focus on Arbitrum aligns with its roadmap to streamline multi-chain operations. (Decrypt)

2. v10.3 Staking Discounts Live (29 October 2025)

Overview: The v10.3 upgrade introduced tiered fee discounts for $GNS stakers, combining volume-based and staking incentives. Maximum discounts reach 75% (50% from staking, 25% from volume), applicable to core trading pairs like BTC and ETH.

What this means: This creates a deflationary loop: higher trading volume → more fees → increased token burns → reduced supply. However, GNS’s price remains 32% below its 90-day high ($2.08), suggesting adoption growth hasn’t yet offset broader market pressures. (Gains Network)

3. Token Burn Accelerates (9 November 2025)

Overview: Gains Network’s Stage III burn mechanism destroyed 695K $GNS (worth ~$980K) in 30 days, driven by trading fee revenue. The protocol has burned 10M tokens since inception, reducing circulating supply to 26.7M.

What this means: At current burn rates, supply could shrink by 25-30% annually, potentially countering selling pressure. However, GNS remains 37% down year-over-year, reflecting skepticism about synthetic perpetual platforms amid competition. (Gains Network)

Conclusion

Gains Network is betting on deflationary tokenomics and Arbitrum-centric growth, but macroeconomic headwinds and sector rotation into Bitcoin-centric assets pose challenges. Will post-contest user retention justify the aggressive burns, or will supply reduction alone fail to lift sentiment?

Deep Dive

1. Cross-Chain Expansion via VOOI (Q4 2025)

Overview: Gains Network integrated with VOOI’s chain-abstracted platform in October 2025, enabling gasless trading of crypto, forex, and commodities across EVM chains. This partnership eliminates bridging and custody risks while offering up to 500× leverage (Eric).

What this means: This is bullish for GNS because cross-chain accessibility could attract CEX-level trading volumes to gTrade. However, reliance on third-party platforms like VOOI introduces execution risks if adoption lags.

2. RWA Market Expansion (Ongoing)

Overview: Gains has been adding real-world asset (RWA) markets since June 2025, including commodities and forex pairs. A 30% fee discount on RWA trades is active to incentivize usage (Arbitrum).

What this means: This is neutral for GNS as RWAs broaden utility but face regulatory uncertainty. Success hinges on sustaining trader interest post-discounts and navigating compliance challenges.

3. Arbitrum Liquidity Consolidation (Q4 2025)

Overview: The “Trick or Trade” competition (22 Oct–19 Nov 2025) directs $400K in protocol funds to reward Arbitrum-based trading activity, aligning with Gains’ strategy to centralize liquidity on its highest-volume chain (Decrypt).

What this means: This is bullish short-term, as contests historically boost volumes. Post-event, sustaining liquidity without incentives remains a key test.

Conclusion

Gains Network is prioritizing cross-chain reach, RWA diversity, and Arbitrum-centric liquidity. While these initiatives could tighten GNS’s supply-demand dynamics via increased fee burns, broader market sentiment and regulatory clarity for RWAs will heavily influence outcomes. How might Ethereum’s Pectra upgrade impact Gains’ multi-chain ambitions?

Deep Dive

1. Fee Discounts for Stakers (29 October 2025)

Overview: Traders staking $GNS or $gGNS now receive tiered fee discounts, combining volume-based and stake-based reductions.

The update introduces dynamic fee structures:
- Max stake (50% discount): Requires holding 50,000 $GNS.
- Volume tiers (25% discount): Based on 30-day rolling trading volume.
- Combined discounts cap at 75% for core pairs (e.g., 0.0031% fees on counter-trades).

What this means: This is bullish for GNS because it incentivizes long-term holding and aligns trader activity with token utility, potentially increasing demand. (Source)

2. Virtual Orderbook Launch (9 November 2025)

Overview: The Virtual Orderbook (VOB) aggregates liquidity data across all DEXs, providing traders with real-time market depth.

This tool eliminates reliance on single-DEX liquidity, offering tighter spreads and execution transparency. It’s part of broader efforts to streamline gTrade’s UI/UX, including a redesigned landing page.

What this means: This is neutral for GNS as it improves trader experience but doesn’t directly impact tokenomics. However, increased platform usability could drive volume growth. (Source)

3. gTrade v10 Scalability (4 August 2025)

Overview: The v10 upgrade optimized liquidity pools and introduced synthetic asset architecture for deeper markets.

Key changes:
- Multi-collateral vaults: Enhanced capital efficiency for liquidity providers.
- Dynamic fee routing: Reduced slippage via smart order matching.
- $200K trading competition: Boosted adoption post-launch.

What this means: This is bullish for GNS because higher liquidity and lower friction attract more traders, driving fee revenue and token burns. (Source)

Conclusion

Gains Network continues refining its codebase to prioritize trader retention, liquidity depth, and deflationary token mechanics. The focus on staking incentives and aggregated liquidity tools suggests a strategy to cement gTrade’s position in the competitive Perp DEX arena.

How might these updates impact GNS’s deflationary trajectory as trading activity scales?