Latest Datagram Network (DGRAM) News Update

Deep Dive

1. @xuezhelaoA: "Sell pressure warning" 🚨

"Initial circulating supply = 5.75B (57.5% of total). Predict 30-50% dump at launch – take profits fast!"
– @xuezhelaoA (31K followers · 8.9K impressions · 2025-11-17 01:56 UTC)
View original post
What this means: Bearish short-term as early backers/airdroppers could liquidate positions given DGRAM’s -61% weekly drop to $0.0021. High velocity (9.38x turnover ratio) confirms active distribution.

2. @DGramNetwork: "TGE stream & giveaways" 🎉

"Join our launch celebration at 5AM UTC – community rewards await!"
– @DGramNetwork (155K followers · 2.4K impressions · 2025-11-18 04:10 UTC)
View original post
What this means: Bullish counter-narrative trying to build holder momentum, though 44% price crash post-TGE suggests weak follow-through.

3. @CoinMarketCap: "Alpha listings defy market fear" 📉

"DGRAM leads 5 new Binance Alpha listings despite $300B crypto market bleed"
– @CoinMarketCap (6.9M followers · 0.003 impressions · 2025-11-23 05:00 UTC)
View original post
What this means: Mixed signal – exchange support shows institutional confidence, but launching during extreme fear (CMC F&G Index 29) risks poor token performance.

Conclusion

The consensus on DGRAM is bearish-leaning mixed – strong DePIN thesis clashes with weak tokenomics and disastrous post-lunch price action (-79% monthly). Watch whether the 2.09B circulating supply can stabilize above the $0.002 psychological level, as further exchange liquidations could trigger another leg down.

Deep Dive

1. BNB Chain Trading Competition (26 November 2025)

Overview:
Binance Alpha’s 14-day competition (26 Nov–10 Dec) incentivized DGRAM trading via 4x limit-order bonuses, distributing 89.9M tokens (~$224,750 at current $0.0025/DGRAM) to top 8,500 volume leaders.

What this means:
This is neutral for DGRAM as artificial volume spikes may not sustain organic demand. While the campaign temporarily lifted daily trading volume to $80.2M (now $80.2M, down 82% from peak), the token’s price has continued its -39% 24h slide. (Binance)

2. Gate US Liquidity Push (1 December 2025)

Overview:
Gate US launched a staking campaign (28 Nov–5 Dec) offering 5.6M DGRAM to users committing BTC/ETH/DGRAM, aiming to stabilize liquidity amid a -75% 90d price drop.

What this means:
This is cautiously bullish for DGRAM if the campaign reduces sell pressure from early airdrop recipients. However, with 57.5% of the 10B max supply already circulating, sustained recovery depends on broader DePIN adoption. (Gate)

3. Multi-Exchange Launch Turbulence (18 November 2025)

Overview:
DGRAM debuted on Binance Alpha and Gate on 18 November with coordinated airdrops (18M tokens), but initial $0.013 highs quickly reversed amid high sell pressure.

What this means:
This is bearish in the short term, reflecting weak holder conviction. The token’s -76% 30d decline aligns with extreme fear in crypto markets (Fear & Greed Index: 29/100) and DePIN sector headwinds. (Gate)

Conclusion

DGRAM’s exchange-driven campaigns face uphill battles against macro sentiment and tokenomics (57.5% circulating supply). While incentives may slow the bleed, the key question remains: Can real-world DePIN adoption offset its inflationary token model before 2026?

Deep Dive

1. Gate US NextUp Campaign (28 Nov – 5 Dec 2025)

Overview:
Gate US’s #12 NextUp campaign allows users to commit BTC, ETH, or DGRAM to share 5,600,000 DGRAM tokens (Gate US). The event targets U.S. users, emphasizing compliance and institutional-grade liquidity.

What this means:
This is neutral for DGRAM because airdrop campaigns may temporarily boost trading activity but risk increasing sell pressure if recipients cash out. The U.S.-focused approach could aid regulatory credibility but limits global participation.

2. BNB Smart Chain Trading Competition (26 Nov – 10 Dec 2025)

Overview:
Binance Alpha’s trading competition incentivizes DGRAM trading with 89,998,000 DGRAM rewards for top 8,500 users (Binance). Limit orders count 4x toward rewards, favoring strategic traders.

What this means:
This is bullish for DGRAM because the competition could increase short-term demand and liquidity. However, post-event volatility is likely if winners sell rewards, especially given DGRAM’s 73.8% 30-day decline.

Conclusion

Datagram Network’s immediate roadmap focuses on exchange-driven liquidity campaigns, with no protocol-level upgrades confirmed. While these initiatives may stabilize trading activity, the lack of technical milestones raises questions about long-term utility. How will DGRAM transition from exchange incentives to organic ecosystem growth?

Deep Dive

1. Capsule NFT Mechanics (September 2025)

Overview: Capsules are NFTs representing locked $DGRAM allocations, replacing rigid vesting schedules. They allow partial claims, transfers, or early redemptions (with penalties).

The system links 12-month linear vesting to node operation: 10% unlocks at mainnet, 90% vests daily. Early redemption burns 50% of unvested tokens and redistributes the rest to active Capsules. This aims to deter token dumping while enabling liquidity for compliant users.

What this means: This is neutral for DGRAM because it balances flexibility with network stability – committed node operators gain upside from early exits, but short-term traders face disincentives. (Source)

2. Node Claim Process Update (8 December 2025)

Overview: Claiming Full Core Node Licenses now requires KYC-verified accounts and real-time wallet balance checks for transaction fees.

The update enforces a 1-year lock on claimed nodes and limits transfers to Datagram-native wallets. Users can now partially claim licenses per transaction, addressing gas fee constraints.

What this means: This is mildly bullish for DGRAM because stricter node controls may reduce sybil attacks and improve network uptime, though complexity could deter casual participants. (Source)

Conclusion

Datagram’s recent updates prioritize long-term node operator alignment over technical protocol upgrades, reflecting its DePIN focus on physical infrastructure growth. With the codebase unchanged since mainnet, how might future upgrades balance decentralization with compliance demands as node count scales?