Deep Dive
1. Manuscript Open-Sourced (8 Jan 2026)
Overview: Chainbase open-sourced Manuscript, its framework for structuring multi-chain data, allowing developers to build standardized models across 220+ integrated blockchains.
This update simplifies creating cross-chain dApps and analytics tools by providing reusable templates for data indexing, querying, and transformation. It reduces development time for projects needing unified access to Ethereum, Solana, and other networks.
What this means: This is bullish for Chainbase because it lowers barriers for developers to create AI-ready data products, potentially increasing ecosystem adoption. (Source)
2. x402 Protocol Integration (8 Dec 2025)
Overview: The x402 Protocol introduced micropayments for on-demand data access, letting users pay only for the blockchain queries they execute.
This aligns with Chainbase’s shift toward a decentralized DataFi economy, where data providers earn fees directly through smart contracts. The protocol supports ERC-20 and SPL tokens for cross-chain compatibility.
What this means: This is neutral-to-bullish, as it creates new monetization avenues but depends on adoption of pay-per-use models in Web3. (Source)
3. EVM Tracer & WalruS3 (2025–2026)
Overview:
- EVM Tracer: Captures execution-layer data (e.g., smart contract state changes) for deeper transaction analysis.
- WalruS3: A decentralized storage layer with cryptographic proofs to verify data integrity.
These upgrades enable AI models to access granular, tamper-proof blockchain data while ensuring storage redundancy across nodes.
What this means: This is bullish as it strengthens Chainbase’s infrastructure for AI/ML use cases, a key growth area in crypto.
Conclusion
Chainbase’s recent updates signal a strategic pivot toward decentralized data monetization and AI-ready infrastructure. By open-sourcing core tools and enhancing verifiable data layers, the project aims to position itself as critical middleware in the Web3 stack.
Could increased developer adoption of Manuscript offset competition from centralized data providers?