🚨 UNI at Key Support – What’s Next?  🦄 UNI remains in a downtrend but is currently testing a major support zone between 4.80–4.90. This level has historically held multiple times, making it pivotal for potential bounces or continuation of the bearish trend. How price reacts here will likely define the next significant move.  📌 Why this matters:  • Buyers are defending this key support, but sellers have been strong recently, creating a wait-for-confirmation scenario. • Confirmation could come from bullish candlestick patterns, rising volume, or momentum indicators turning positive. • Observing correlations with BTC and major altcoins helps understand short-term market context.  ⚠️ Possible scenarios:  1⃣ Support Holds: UNI could bounce from this zone, offering opportunistic entry points. Some traders may consider entering at CMP with a stop-loss at 4.42, providing a clear risk point while aligning with the support zone.  2⃣ Support Breaks: A clean break below 4.80 could invalidate bullish setups and trigger further downside, highlighting the importance of risk management and discipline.  💎 Meanwhile, the TON ecosystem continues to expand, and STONfi remains at the forefront of its DeFi growth. With permissionless trading, deep liquidity, low fees, and fast transactions, @ston_fi  provides a secure and efficient environment for traders and builders alike. Farming opportunities, transparent mechanics, and innovative tools make STONfi one of the most dynamic DEXs on TON.  📊 UNI’s reaction to this support is critical. Monitoring price behavior here can provide actionable insights for the next swings.  DYOR - educational content only, not financial advice.  #STONfi  $UNI

AI found 85 critical bugs in BTC apps 🚨

85 critical bugs found in Bitcoin apps

Sixteen volunteer developers pointed AI models at 390 open-source $BTC projects and logged nearly 5,000 security findings in about 27 hours — 85 critical, 635 high severity — on roughly $10K a day of compute. The trigger was the Coldcard wallet flaw, a 2021 seed bug that hid for five years. Bitcoin Core itself remains untouched; the cracks are in the apps built around it.

As Ekon details, the severity split is the real story: critical means a live attacker path — key extraction, remote fund theft — and the patch rate on those 85 criticals matters more than any headline count. Data shared by Cryptothreads.io shows the risk clustering in privacy tools, exchanges and payment rails, with about $88M already drained via the Coldcard flaw. To Theoriq Community, detection is only half the job — a report with no enforcement behind it just sits in a queue.

The pushback comes from Signal Over Noise, who notes only about one in five findings is confirmed exploitable, all were disclosed privately, and the fix for most users is simply keeping wallet apps updated. AI has made finding bugs nearly free; verifying and patching still runs at human speed. Can the fixers keep pace with the hunters?

Bitcoin

AI just scanned 390 Bitcoin projects and flagged 4,962 bugs in 24 hours, 85 of them critical. Is your favorite app safe?

85-critical-bugs-found-in-Bitcoin-apps

Hackers hit Bitcoin and Ethereum DeFi

More than $35 million vanished from DeFi in six hours on Thursday. Perps exchange AFX lost about $24 million to compromised bridge keys, the Verus-Ethereum bridge was drained of $7.5 million through the same bug that hit it in May, and Bitcoin scaling project B² lost $3.9 million to a hijacked upgrade key. None of the attacks broke any cryptography — every loss traced back to stolen keys or logic flaws.

The debate now centers on investor psychology. As The Crypto Brief frames it, $BTC and $ETH themselves remain secure, but every major hack weakens confidence and can trigger short-term selling pressure — security is only as strong as the protocol you're using. A similar warning comes from CoinCompass: the attacks hit DeFi applications, not the chains, yet for investors the distinction doesn't always matter, since large hacks stoke fear, thin out liquidity and weigh on sentiment market-wide.

Where both converge is the real cost — the trust that leaves with the stolen funds. With institutional capital flowing in, audits, bug bounties and real-time monitoring may now matter as much as high yields. Does DeFi bounce back fast, or do repeated exploits keep slowing adoption?

Ethereum

Hackers hit AFX for $24M, Verus for $7.5M and B2 for $3.8M, all within hours. Why do crypto bridges keep failing?  
