DeFi

Stablecoin

View

United

Impact

<p>The crypto trade group supports the GENIUS Act rollout but wants Treasury to sharpen language on DeFi and foreign issuers.</p>
<p>The Blockchain Association, a prominent crypto industry trade group, has endorsed the Treasury Department's rollout of the GENIUS Act stablecoin rule. The organization is pressing for more precise definitions in the regulation, particularly concerning decentralized finance protocols and foreign stablecoin issuers.</p>
<p>According to reporting from CryptoBriefing and The Block, the association's stance reflects general support for the regulatory direction Treasury has taken. At the same time, the group has flagged specific areas where it believes the current language leaves too much room for interpretation.</p>
<p>The GENIUS Act represents a significant attempt to create a federal framework for stablecoin issuance and oversight. Stablecoins have grown into a critical piece of crypto market infrastructure, used widely for trading, settlement, and increasingly for payments. Clear rules around who can issue them, and how they must be backed, matter to both issuers and the broader financial system.</p>
<p>The Blockchain Association's concerns about DeFi rules point to a recurring tension in crypto regulation. Many stablecoin rules are written with centralized issuers in mind. Decentralized protocols, which often lack a single controlling entity, can struggle to fit neatly into frameworks built around traditional corporate structures. Industry groups have repeatedly asked regulators to account for this difference rather than applying one-size-fits-all compliance standards.</p>
<p>Foreign issuer provisions present a separate challenge. Stablecoins issued outside the United States already circulate widely in global crypto markets. How Treasury treats these issuers under the new framework could affect market access, competition, and the ability of U.S. users to transact with non-domestic tokens. The Blockchain Association wants this treatment spelled out more explicitly, according to the reporting.</p>
<p>Treasury's rulemaking process is still unfolding, and industry input of this kind is a normal part of shaping final regulatory text. The association's position suggests it sees the overall framework as workable but worth refining before it becomes binding across the stablecoin sector.</p>
<p>The group's dual message, support paired with specific requests for clarity, is consistent with how trade associations typically engage with federal rulemaking. Rather than opposing the rule outright, the Blockchain Association appears focused on shaping implementation details that could materially affect how issuers and DeFi platforms operate under the new law.</p>
<h2 id="market-impact">Market Impact</h2>
<p>Stablecoin issuers and DeFi platforms are likely watching this rulemaking process closely, since definitional clarity directly affects compliance costs and market access. Ambiguity around DeFi treatment could create uncertainty for protocols that do not fit traditional corporate models, potentially affecting development decisions in the sector.</p>
<p>Foreign issuer rules could also influence which stablecoins remain easily accessible to U.S. users and exchanges. Clearer guidance from Treasury may reduce compliance uncertainty for both domestic and international stablecoin providers, though the ultimate market effect will depend on the final rule's specific language.</p>
<p>The Blockchain Association's intervention underscores that stablecoin regulation remains a work in progress even as the GENIUS Act framework advances. How Treasury addresses DeFi and foreign issuer definitions could shape the stablecoin market's structure for years to come.</p>
<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>
<h3 id="what-is-the-genius-act">What is the GENIUS Act?</h3>
<p>It is federal legislation establishing a regulatory framework for stablecoin issuance and oversight in the United States, now being implemented through Treasury rulemaking.</p>
<h3 id="what-does-the-blockchain-association-want-changed">What does the Blockchain Association want changed?</h3>
<p>The group wants Treasury to provide clearer definitions, particularly for how DeFi protocols and foreign stablecoin issuers are treated under the new rule.</p>
<h3 id="does-the-blockchain-association-oppose-the-treasury-rule">Does the Blockchain Association oppose the Treasury rule?</h3>
<p>No, reporting indicates the association broadly supports the rule's direction but is seeking refinements to specific definitions before final implementation.</p>
<h3 id="why-does-defi-present-a-regulatory-challenge-for-stablecoin-rules">Why does DeFi present a regulatory challenge for stablecoin rules?</h3>
<p>DeFi protocols often lack a single controlling entity, making it harder to apply compliance frameworks designed for centralized, corporate stablecoin issuers.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong> 20 Oct 2026, 04:52 UTC · added by crypto.news</p>
<p>crypto.news reports that the Blockchain Association’s comments came in the form of a 26-page letter submitted to Treasury, specifically addressing how the rules would apply to stablecoin trading platforms and intermediaries in addition to DeFi and foreign-issued tokens.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong> 20 Oct 2026, 06:48 UTC · added by CoinGape</p>
<p>CoinGape reports the Blockchain Association’s input came via a 26-page letter, with the January 18, 2027 effective date cited as the deadline for finalizing rules. The letter specifies three concrete asks: a narrower definition of DASP (digital asset service provider), limits on “knowing participation” liability, and reliance on public prohibition lists to vet foreign stablecoin issuers.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong> 20 Oct 2026, 09:35 UTC · added by Unchained</p>
<p>Unchained reports that the Blockchain Association’s comment letter was a 26-page filing dated Oct. 19, the final day Treasury accepted public feedback on the proposal. The letter specifically asks Treasury to raise the threshold for finding that a crypto company “took part” in an unlawful stablecoin issuance, and to explicitly keep traders and DeFi infrastructure providers outside the rule’s scope.</p>
<p>Originally reported by <a href="https://altcoingordon.com/crypto-industry-group-backs-treasury-stablecoin-rule-seeks/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">AltcoinGordon</a>, written by Sophia Bennett. Republished with permission.</p>
<p><a href="https://altcoingordon.com/crypto-industry-group-backs-treasury-stablecoin-rule-seeks/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">View the original on AltcoinGordon →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thecoinrise.com/crypto-industry-group-backs-treasury-stablecoin-rule-seeks-sharper-definitions/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Crypto Industry Group Backs Treasury Stablecoin Rule, Seeks Sharper Definitions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thecoinrise.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">TheCoinrise.com</a>.</p>

Crypto Industry Group Backs Treasury Stablecoin Rule, Seeks Sharper Definitions

Table of Contents

TheCoinrise Media

Other articles published on Oct 20, 2026

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!