Namecoin

Drops

Surge

<img width="1920" height="1080" src="https://blockchainreporter.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/blockchain25-1-677fbb194e92a-7.webp" alt="Blockchain Main 21" style="float: right; margin-left: 5px;" title="Chainalysis: Blockchain Dead Drops for Malware Surge 420% in a Year 21">
<p>Cybercriminals and state-sponsored hackers are increasingly storing malware instructions directly on public blockchains, a tactic Chainalysis calls “blockchain dead drops,” according to a <a href="https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/etherhiding-blockchain-dead-drops/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">report the analytics firm published on September 17</a>. The practice has surged 420% over the past year and 440% since open-source Chinese AI models began generating malicious code, with North Korean and Iranian state-linked groups now responsible for roughly two-thirds of new activity.</p>
<h2 id="how-blockchain-dead-drops-work">How Blockchain Dead Drops Work</h2>
<p>Blockchain dead drops, or BDDs, store malware payloads and command-and-control configuration data in on-chain transactions and smart contracts, where infected machines can retrieve them on demand. Because public blockchains cannot be taken offline, the technique gives campaigns a durability that survives domain seizures, hosting takedowns and repository removals. The danger is not greater destructive power, Chainalysis notes, but greater campaign longevity. Once the malware retrieves what it needs, the operation moves off-chain for the actual compromise. This builds on earlier reporting in which <a href="https://blockchainreporter.net/microsoft-exposes-bnb-smart-chain-contracts-used-to-deliver-malware-instructions/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Microsoft exposed BNB Smart Chain contracts used to deliver malware instructions</a>.</p>
<h2 id="nation-state-actors-take-the-lead">Nation-State Actors Take the Lead</h2>
<p>The tactic has existed for more than a decade, from a Necurs botnet variant storing command-and-control domains on Namecoin in 2013 to the Glupteba botnet writing data into Bitcoin’s OP_RETURN field in 2019. It reached EVM chains in mid-2023 with “EtherHiding,” when ClearFake operators embedded malware in Binance Smart Chain smart contracts after Cloudflare disrupted their servers. Iranian threat actors embedded command-and-control data in Bitcoin transactions in late 2024, and North Korean agents folded EtherHiding into their fake job interview ruse in early 2025. By the second quarter of 2026, state-linked groups accounted for roughly half of total dead-drop activity, with malicious writes to the blockchain climbing from 2.06 per day to 11.1 per day.</p>
<h2 id="ai-lowers-the-barrier-and-threat-intel-misses-it">AI Lowers the Barrier, and Threat Intel Misses It</h2>
<p>The surge accelerated after open-weight Chinese large language models launched without restrictions on generating malicious code, removing the expertise barrier that once limited the tactic to sophisticated operators. Chainalysis now tracks dead drops across five major blockchains and more than a dozen named malware strains, with campaigns often targeting crypto wallets and credentials through infostealing malware or installing remote access trojans for persistent control. The firm warns that traditional threat-intelligence platforms can miss on-chain activity, echoing its earlier finding that <a href="https://blockchainreporter.net/ai-crypto-crime-40-percent-trm-labs/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">AI use in crypto crime jumped 40% in a year</a>.</p>

Chainalysis: Blockchain Dead Drops for Malware Surge 420% in a Year

Table of Contents

BlockchainReporter

Other articles published on Sep 18, 2026

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!