Patrick

Secure

Four

SafePal

<p>The private message control saga takes a new twist. After a rejection in March, it is indeed back at the heart of the debates. This Thursday, July 9, the European Parliament is set to re-vote on the extension of the Chat Control system. This rekindles concerns about the confidentiality of private messages and the future of encryption in Europe. We tell you more in the following paragraphs!</p>
<div class="in-brief">
 <div class="in-brief--container"><span></span><span></span>
  <h2 class="in-brief--title" id="in-brief">In brief</h2>
  <ul>
   <li>The European Parliament is set to vote again this Thursday, July 9, 2026, on extending the private message monitoring rules known as “Chat Control 1.0.”</li>
   <li>In March 2026, the extension of the proposal allowing the voluntary scanning of messaging services was rejected by a single vote (307 to 306).</li>
   <li>This new vote reignites the debate over end-to-end encryption, privacy, and the future of secure communications in Europe.</li>
  </ul>
 </div>
</div>
<h2 id="h-the-debate-about-chat-control-reaches-a-new-milestone-in-brussels">The debate about Chat Control reaches a new milestone in Brussels</h2>
<p>Commonly called <strong>“<a href="https://www.cointribune.com/en/chat-control-a-european-law-that-could-explode-web3-usage/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Chat Control 1.0</a>“</strong>, this European law allowed tech giants to voluntarily analyze communications. More concretely, this legal framework authorized messaging platforms to detect child abuse content.</p>
<div class="my-4">
 <div class="ads "></div>
</div>
<p>Chat Control 1.0 <strong>expired on April 3, 2026</strong>, after the rejection of an extension by the MEPs by a single vote in March. The vote result was:</p>
<ul>
 <li>311 votes against;</li>
 <li>228 in favor;</li>
 <li>92 abstentions.</li>
</ul>
<p>Since then, services like <a href="https://www.cointribune.com/en/x-chat-elon-musk-promises-an-app-safer-than-whatsapp/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">WhatsApp</a> and Messenger continue to operate on a strictly voluntary basis (outside any legal framework).</p>
<p>Tuesday, July 7, 2026, a dramatic turn! The <a href="https://www.greens-efa.eu/en/article/press/chatcontrol-meps-agree-to-controversial-vote-by-urgency-procedure" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">European Parliament</a> approves the use of a <strong>rarely used emergency procedure</strong>. It modifies the usual parliamentary rules. Supported by the European People’s Party (EPP) and several member states, the vote obtained 331 votes against 304 and 11 abstentions.</p>
<p>Opponents denounce a challenge to the previous vote. Supporters of the text consider it essential to avoid a legal void after the expiration of the derogation provided by the <strong>ePrivacy regulation</strong>. For his part, EPP group president Manfred Weber has been seeking for several weeks a way to pass the text without changes, with the support of the EU Council. The latter approved a compromise version in early July.</p>
<div class="affiliate-button"><a href="https://store.safepal.com/safepal-s1-hardware-wallet.html?ref=cointribunecoinmediasa" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Secure your cryptos with SafePal</a><a href="https://www.cointribune.com/en/sponsored-content/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">This link uses an affiliate program.</a>
</div>
<h2 id="h-the-crucial-point-of-this-new-episode-lies-in-the-voting-rules-themselves">The crucial point of this new episode lies in the voting rules themselves</h2>
<p>Generally, a simple majority would have been sufficient to reject or amend the <strong>proposal on private message control</strong>. However, the Chat Control 1.0 dossier is examined in second reading. This means that an absolute majority of 361 votes out of 720 MEPs is required to adopt it.</p>
<p>According to some analysts, this procedure offers a considerable advantage to supporters of the text. Especially since the vote is held during the last plenary session before the summer break. This period is characterized by extremely high parliamentary absenteeism.</p>
<p>MEP Markéta Gregorová, negotiator for the Greens/EFA on this dossier, strongly criticized this maneuver:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote">
 <p><em>This vote violates our own procedural rules.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>She accused the EPP of abusing its position as the largest political group to resurrect <strong>a text already rejected by MEPs</strong>.</p>
<div class="my-4">
 <div class="ads "></div>
</div>
<p>Four European Commissioners, for their part, sent a letter to parliamentarians before Tuesday’s vote. They emphasize the risks of a persistent regulatory vacuum for detecting online abuses.</p>
<h2 id="h-the-debate-on-chat-control-opposes-two-hardly-reconcilable-logics">The debate on Chat Control opposes two hardly reconcilable logics</h2>
<p>The <strong>Chat Control 1.0 dossier</strong> opposes two clearly distinct entities:</p>
<ul>
 <li>the institutions, the European Commission and part of the Council</li>
 <li>the defenders of digital freedoms</li>
</ul>
<p>The first consider that current voluntary measures are not enough to combat the spread of child abuse material. The fact is that some service providers are less involved than others in detecting this content. According to them, <strong>the absence of a harmonized legal framework</strong> thus creates blind spots exploited by offenders.</p>
<p>The second denounce a disproportionate mass surveillance system potentially incompatible with the respect for privacy guaranteed by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.</p>
<div class="tweet">
 <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><a href="https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/2074709559973752987%20?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"></a>
 </blockquote>
</div>
<p>The main sticking point? The impact of the text on <strong>end-to-end encryption</strong>. This technology protects exchanges on apps like Signal and WhatsApp. Experts and cybersecurity researchers have repeatedly warned about the high false positive rates of automated detection tools. A risk that fuels opposition to <strong>the extension of Chat Control!</strong></p>
<h2 id="what-consequences-for-platforms-and-users">What consequences for platforms and users?</h2>
<p>If <strong>the extension of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chat_Control" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Chat Control</a></strong> is confirmed on Thursday, the derogatory regime to the ePrivacy directive would be extended until 2028. This would allow service providers to detect, report, and remove child abuse content on a voluntary basis. Companies like <a href="https://www.cointribune.com/en/european-regulators-challenge-meta-over-whatsapp-access-rules/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Meta</a>, Google, and Microsoft could thus resume detection practices currently carried out outside any legal framework since April.</p>
<p>For European users, the issue directly concerns the <strong>confidentiality of their daily digital exchanges</strong>. This concerns both consumer messaging and professional services.</p>
<p>Supporters of an alternative approach argue for a paradigm shift. This is notably the case of former MEP Patrick Breyer. According to him, the ideal would be to target investigations on users already suspected and under judicial control rather than imposing a generalized scan of communications.</p>
<div class="tweet">
 <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><a href="https://twitter.com/echo_pbreyer/status/2074478547402436984%20?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"></a>
 </blockquote>
</div>
<p>This targeted approach remains at the heart of negotiations on the future permanent regulation against child sexual abuse. Still under discussion since 2022, the dossier has been named <strong>“Chat Control 2.0”.</strong></p>
<h2 id="towards-permanent-control-of-private-messages">Towards permanent control of private messages?</h2>
<p>Thursday’s vote in no way closes the Chat Control dossier. Indeed, it is a transitional measure. The current procedure would allow European institutions to negotiate a permanent text regulating the detection of online abuse.</p>
<p>The <strong>question of <a href="https://www.cointribune.com/en/vitalik-buterin-opposes-chat-control-a-battle-for-digital-privacy/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">digital privacy</a></strong> versus child protection imperatives will therefore remain at the center of discussions in Brussels in the coming months. But potential repercussions beyond the telecommunications sector can already be expected. This mainly refers to the ecosystem of decentralized technologies and encrypted messengers used in the crypto sphere.</p>
<p>In any case, Thursday’s vote on private message control illustrates the ongoing tensions between security and digital freedoms in Europe. Beyond this transitional text, the entire future of encryption and online confidentiality is at stake in Brussels. To be continued…</p>

Chat Control Returns to the European Parliament for a New Vote

Table of Contents

Cointribune EN

Other articles published on Jul 9, 2026

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!