Ridge

Wednesday

Tesla

Elon Musk

<p><a href="https://bitcoinworld.co.in" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">BitcoinWorld</a><br><img src="https://bitcoinworld.co.in/wp-content/uploads/elon-musk-openai-lawsuit-testimony.jpg"><br><a href="https://bitcoinworld.co.in/elon-musk-openai-lawsuit-testimony/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Elon Musk OpenAI Lawsuit: Court Testimony Reveals Stunning Contradiction Over AGI and Tesla</a></p>
<p>Elon Musk arrived at a California federal court on Wednesday to argue that Sam Altman and his cofounders “stole a charity.” He left having admitted, under oath, that Tesla is not currently pursuing artificial general intelligence (AGI). This directly contradicted a tweet he had posted just weeks earlier. It was that kind of day for Musk.</p>
<h2 id="elon-musk-openai-lawsuit-the-core-dispute">Elon Musk OpenAI Lawsuit: The Core Dispute</h2>
<p>The lawsuit challenges the structure of OpenAI. Musk alleges that Sam Altman and other cofounders tricked him into backing a non-profit. Then, they launched the frontier lab’s for-profit arm. That arm now dominates the organization. After Musk testified for hours on Wednesday, the case may hinge on how much jurors and Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers distinguish between investors with capped profits and those without.</p>
<p>In Musk’s telling, he cofounded the lab with Sam Altman, Ilya Sutskever, Greg Brockman, and others. He trusted them to build AI for humanity. Over time, he became suspicious of their motives. He concluded that they were “looting the nonprofit.” OpenAI’s lawyer, William Savitt, sought to complicate that story during cross-examination. Savitt tried to show that Musk had supported efforts to transition OpenAI toward for-profit status. This would allow it to raise funds to compete with firms like Google. Musk even considered incorporating the AI lab into Tesla.</p>
<h2 id="musk-court-testimony-agi-a-direct-contradiction">Musk Court Testimony AGI: A Direct Contradiction</h2>
<p>Musk testified that he had discussed converting the company to a for-profit as early as 2016. In 2017, he explored creating a for-profit arm where he would hold the majority of equity and control. When those plans fell apart, he stopped making regular donations to OpenAI. He continued to pay for its office space until 2020.</p>
<p>The most striking moment came during cross-examination about Tesla’s AI ambitions. Musk stated that Tesla’s AI work focuses only on self-driving, not AGI. AGI refers to AI systems that can perform any intellectual task a human can. Savitt then asked about a recent tweet from Musk claiming that “Tesla will be one of the companies to make AGI.” Musk responded, “We are not pursuing AGI right now.” This admission directly contradicts his public statements. Tesla shareholders may want to take note.</p>
<h3 id="tesla-ai-ambitions-vs-public-statements">Tesla AI Ambitions vs. Public Statements</h3>
<p>This is not the first time Musk has found himself on the wrong side of his own tweets. He was also asked about a tweet claiming he invested $100 million in OpenAI. The actual amount that changed hands was $38 million. Musk argued that his reputation and network made up for the disparity. Savitt also brought up emails where Musk backed efforts by Tesla and Neuralink to poach employees from OpenAI while he was still on that company’s board. One conversation focused on Andrej Karpathy, who left OpenAI to lead self-driving work at Tesla. Another focused on Sutskever, whom Zillis suggested Musk recruit.</p>
<h2 id="openai-for-profit-transition-key-evidence">OpenAI For-Profit Transition: Key Evidence</h2>
<p>The earliest major investments by Microsoft in OpenAI limited the software giant’s profits. Those restrictions have been rolled back over the years. Musk says those changes led him to bring this lawsuit. Savitt tried to establish that Musk had been consulted by Altman and Shivon Zillis about subsequent fundraising efforts. Zillis is Musk’s longtime adviser and the mother of four of his children. She was also a member of the OpenAI board when it approved some of those transactions. Musk did not object at the time.</p>
<p>The most consequential thread of the day may have been about safety. Part of Musk’s case rests on the idea that OpenAI’s transition to a traditional corporation is dangerous. It reduces the company’s focus on safety. Savitt had Musk admit that all AI companies, including his own, suffer from this risk. Judge Gonzalez Rogers halted that line of questioning. However, in remarks to the lawyers after testimony, she made clear it would resume with limits.</p>
<h3 id="sam-altman-charity-dispute-legal-strategy">Sam Altman Charity Dispute: Legal Strategy</h3>
<p>When Musk’s lawyers floated questions about ChatGPT’s role in the Tumbler Ridge shooting, the judge made her position clear. The Tumbler Ridge incident was a 2024 case in Canada where a man killed his family after extensive conversations with the chatbot. She stated she did not want to hear about scandals caused by AI models. However, xAI and OpenAI’s approaches to safety were fair game. Musk returns Thursday for another round of adversarial questioning. Also expected to testify are his family office manager, Jared Birchall; AI safety expert Stuart Russel; and OpenAI president Greg Brockman.</p>
<h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2>
<p>The Elon Musk OpenAI lawsuit has exposed significant contradictions between Musk’s public statements and his sworn testimony. His admission that Tesla does not currently pursue AGI contradicts his own tweets. The case now hinges on whether the court sees a meaningful difference between capped and unlimited profit for investors. The trial continues, with high stakes for both Musk and the future of AI governance.</p>
<h2 id="faqs">FAQs</h2>
<p><strong>Q1: What is the Elon Musk OpenAI lawsuit about?</strong><br>Musk alleges that Sam Altman and cofounders tricked him into backing a non-profit, then launched a for-profit arm that dominates the organization. He claims they “stole a charity.”</p>
<p><strong>Q2: Did Elon Musk admit Tesla is not pursuing AGI?</strong><br>Yes. Under oath, Musk stated, “We are not pursuing AGI right now,” directly contradicting a recent tweet claiming Tesla would be one of the companies to make AGI.</p>
<p><strong>Q3: What is the key legal issue in the trial?</strong><br>The case may come down to whether the court distinguishes between investors with capped profits versus those with unlimited profits. Musk argues the transition to for-profit is dangerous.</p>
<p><strong>Q4: Who else is expected to testify?</strong><br>Musk’s family office manager Jared Birchall, AI safety expert Stuart Russel, and OpenAI president Greg Brockman are expected to testify.</p>
<p><strong>Q5: How much did Musk actually invest in OpenAI?</strong><br>Musk invested $38 million, not the $100 million he claimed in a tweet. He argued his reputation and network made up for the difference.</p>
<p><strong>Q6: What is the Tumbler Ridge shooting connection?</strong><br>The judge limited discussion of the 2024 Canada incident where a man killed his family after conversations with ChatGPT. She allowed questions about AI safety approaches instead.</p>
<p>This post <a href="https://bitcoinworld.co.in/elon-musk-openai-lawsuit-testimony/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Elon Musk OpenAI Lawsuit: Court Testimony Reveals Stunning Contradiction Over AGI and Tesla</a> first appeared on <a href="https://bitcoinworld.co.in" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">BitcoinWorld</a>.</p>

Elon Musk OpenAI Lawsuit: Court Testimony Reveals Stunning Contradiction Over AGI and Tesla

Table of Contents

ItsBitcoinWorld

Other articles published on Apr 30, 2026

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!