Quantum

Bitcoin

Adam Back

<figure>
 <figcaption>
 Cover image via <a href="https://u.today/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">U.Today</a>
 </figcaption>
</figure>
In a recent social media post, Blockstream CEO Adam Back has<a href="https://x.com/adam3us/status/2000139036804141183" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">dismissed</a> quantum FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) around Bitcoin, exposing that some fearmongering stems from the lack of understanding of how the network actually works.
Writer Josh Otten has argued that a quantum computer could use Shor’s algorithm to break "the encryption guarding Bitcoin’s earliest wallets."
"This would expose the private keys to Satoshi Nakamoto’s fortune, likely crashing the market and destroying trust in the whole system," he predicted.
According to Otten, this is the likeliest scenario that could push the price of Bitcoin to nearly zero in virtually no time.
This implies that the private keys to early Bitcoin addresses could be exposed.
However, Bitcoin wallets rely on elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) for signing transactions, specifically the secp256k1 curve.
Private keys are used to sign transactions while public keys and addresses allow verification. This is not the same as encrypting data. Encryption implies that data is hidden and can be decrypted. Bitcoin's security model is based on signatures that prove ownership without exposing the private key.
<a href="https://u.today/quantum-computers-killing-bitcoin-1-million-btc-advocate-samson-mow-says-no-need-to-worry" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Quantum computers</a> threaten the signing algorithm, not encryption per se.
A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically use Shor’s algorithm to derive private keys from public keys. However, addresses don’t reveal public keys until you spend from them. Early Bitcoin wallets that have never spent their coins haven’t revealed their public keys.
<h2 id="assessing-quantum-threat">Assessing quantum threat</h2>
Ethereum co-founder<a href="https://u.today/vitalik-buterin-sets-timeline-for-ethereum-quantum-resistant-transition" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Vitalik Buterin</a> has warned that the quantum threat is real and measurable.
Solana's Anatoly Yakovenko has estimated that there is a 50/50 chance that enough quantum power could exist to threaten Bitcoin’s cryptography within the next five years.
However, Back has explicitly stated that Bitcoin is unlikely to face a meaningful quantum computing threat for 20–40 years (if ever).
Even the most advanced systems today have high qubit counts but lack the error‑corrected logical qubits needed to run algorithms like Shor’s at scale. Moreover, post-quantum cryptography already exists.<a href="https://u.today/bitcoin-to-zero-adam-back-debunks-quantum-fud" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Read original article on U.Today</a>

Bitcoin to Zero? Adam Back Debunks Quantum FUD

Table of Contents

U.Today

Other articles published on Dec 15, 2025

Revealed: Matrixport Withdraws a Staggering $2.8M in ASTER from Binance

Kevin Hassett Says “Donald Trump Will Not Influence Fed Interest Rate Decisions”

Hassett Advocates Fed Independence Amid Trump's Rate Remarks

UK crypto markets will be regulated like mainstream financial products

Crypto prices today (Dec. 15): BTC, ADA, HYPE, LINK dip amid macro pressures

Marina Protocol Daily Quiz Today 15 December 2025: Earn Coins

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!