Bitcoin Cash

Satoshi

United

Bitcoin

Silk Road

The United States Supreme Court has denied hearing a case involving “stolen” BTC from the formerly prosperous Silk Road marketplace. The decision permits the state to sell the coins valued at around $4 billion USD, but this news and that of a ‘Satoshi reveal’ on HBO still aren’t stopping crypto OGs from ceaselessly developing P2P (peer-to-peer) use cases for bitcoin.&nbsp; 
Right off the bat it should be noted: “Bitcoin” for the purposes of this article means the definition written down in Satoshi Nakamoto’s whitepaper. Namely, “A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash [that allows] online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution.” A very punk rock concept, if one will. 
“Purely peer-to-peer” is what started this whole disruption called bitcoin that we love, and what enabled the Silk Road to grow so massively in the first place. Suffice it to say for now that massive onchain fees alienating average users, custodial second layers, and government-backed ETFs will not be considered “bitcoin” for the purposes of this article. So if bitcoin cash triggers you, please change the channel. 
<figure id="attachment_598163" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-598163" style="width: 100%" class="wp-caption aligncenter">
 <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-598163" src="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Ross-Ulbricht-200x300.webp" alt="" width="300" height="450" srcset="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Ross-Ulbricht-200x300.webp 200w, https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Ross-Ulbricht.webp 600w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px">
 <figcaption id="caption-attachment-598163" class="wp-caption-text">
 Ross Ulbricht
 </figcaption>
</figure> 
&nbsp; 
<h3 id="silk-road-case-won-t-be-heard-4b-stash-of-btc-could-be-sold-by-united-states">Silk Road case won’t be heard, $4B stash of BTC could be sold by United States</h3> 
A <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/100724zor_4gdj.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">recent ruling</a> from the United States Supreme Court has opened up the possibility of another sale of bitcoins allegedly seized&nbsp;by the state from the now infamous Silk Road online marketplace. The Silk Road is back in the news these days with popular appeals for harshly imprisoned founder <a href="https://freeross.org/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Ross Ulbricht</a> to see his life returned to him, and a double life sentence plus 40 years overturned. 
The coins, which the state says are a lawful asset forfeiture connected to criminal activity, have been <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-1164/308371/20240425142311406_FINAL%202024-04-25%20Battle%20Born%20Petition%20PDFA.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">argued by claimants</a> to be nothing of the sort, having a legitimate and innocent owner. 
“The government has never been required to prove these allegations, however, nor has it disclosed the identity of the mystery person who allegedly voluntarily forfeited his interest in an asset now worth $4.4 billion, nor has it alleged that that asset was ever used in any criminal activity,” a <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-1164/308371/20240425142311406_FINAL%202024-04-25%20Battle%20Born%20Petition%20PDFA.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">petition for writ of certiorari</a> initially stated. 
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-598160 size-large" src="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Screenshot-2024-10-09-at-9.16.30-1200x457.png" alt="" width="1200" height="457" srcset="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Screenshot-2024-10-09-at-9.16.30-1200x457.png 1200w, https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Screenshot-2024-10-09-at-9.16.30-300x114.png 300w, https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Screenshot-2024-10-09-at-9.16.30-768x292.png 768w, https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Screenshot-2024-10-09-at-9.16.30-1536x585.png 1536w, https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Screenshot-2024-10-09-at-9.16.30.png 1944w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px"> 
The claimant is a group called Battle Born Investments, which is now back up sats creek without a paddle regarding the coins. The theft was allegedly perpetrated by mysterious “Individual X,” said to be one Raymond Ngan. 
<h3 id="hype-abounds-about-new-hbo-satoshi-documentary">Hype abounds about new HBO Satoshi documentary</h3> 
Speaking of mysterious individuals, Bitcoin’s creator, the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto, has also been in the news again, right along with the Silk Road. It’s like we’re cycling back to the true “<a href="https://www.planoly.com/glossary/og#:~:text=History%20and%20usage,their%20stripes%2C%20so%20to%20speak." rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">OG</a>” days of Bitcoin before the days of Blackrock exchange-traded funds and limitless draconian “regulations.” But still, speculation about the identity of Nakamoto is as old as Bitcoin itself, and terribly played out. 
As one Redditor <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1fyest2/fake_news_spread_that_hbos_satoshi_nakamoto_to_be/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">noted</a>: “The truth is there’s a lot of circumstantial evidence that points to several people. Whoever they reveal depends entirely on the motivations of HBO and/or the director.” The user continued, asserting that naming someone alive could have negative effects. 
“It worries me that they reportedly spoke to the guy in person. If they named Finney or <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/satoshi-nakamoto-exposed-2024/">Sassman</a> it would be fine because they’re dead. But naming someone who is still alive leads me to believe their goal is to stir controversy and FUD,” they said. 
<figure id="attachment_598168" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-598168" style="width: 100%" class="wp-caption aligncenter">
 <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-598168 size-full" src="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Jessica-NFT.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="400" srcset="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Jessica-NFT.jpg 400w, https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Jessica-NFT-300x300.jpg 300w, https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Jessica-NFT-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="(max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px">
 <figcaption id="caption-attachment-598168" class="wp-caption-text">
 “Jessica” NFT on BCH’s UTXO-based smart contract system.
 </figcaption>
</figure> 
<h3 id="utxo-smart-contracts-nfts-blocksize-adjustment-algos-and-more-development-onchain-continues-on-bitcoin-cash">UTXO smart contracts, NFTs, blocksize adjustment algos and more: Development onchain continues on Bitcoin Cash</h3> 
Well, here is the part that will trigger many. But it’s sad it should be so. Underneath all the news about a Satoshi ‘reveal,’ and squabbles about who owns bitcoins that the state habitually steals, development onchain continues on a fork of BTC — bitcoin cash. 
BCH is still used peer-to-peer, not forced to rely on second-layer or custodial add-ons to escape heavenly transaction fees. What’s more, there’s been a lot going on under the radar in past years for the asset. Interestingly, mainstream crypto news is almost dead silent about these innovations. So what are they? 
Well, unspent transaction output-based (UTXO-based) smart contracts for one, resulting in smart contracts comparable to those on Ethereum. Since the contracts are UTXO-based, this means the contract system is baked right into the chain itself. The capability has been active and working since the 2023 upgrade, and notably allows for easy creation of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) for negligible fees. 
BCH developer Jason Dreyzehner has just published his <a href="https://blog.bitjson.com/2025-chips/?ref=bitjsons-blog-newsletter" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">2025 Bitcoin Cash Improvement Proposals</a> as well, seeking to further streamline the new capabilities. In May 2024, a further upgrade was added called ABLA (adaptive blocksize limit algorithm) which allows the BCH blocksize to <a href="https://bitcoincashpodcast.com/faqs/BCH/what-is-the-maximum-bch-blocksize" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">adjust automatically</a> according to network usage. There are <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/1cuby26/comment/l4hpt3x/?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=web3x&amp;utm_name=web3xcss&amp;utm_term=1&amp;utm_content=share_button" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">concerns</a>, of course, about any network. So shilling is not the true aim here. 
Suffice it to say: Whatever <a href="https://www.hbo.com/movies/money-electric-the-bitcoin-mystery" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">HBO says</a>, and however much the government immorally seizes, as far as I can tell, bitcoin is still functioning as peer-to-peer electronic cash, aiming to be a global reserve currency for a more peaceful world. That’s a big “W” for the punks, and something that deserves talking about.

$4.4B Silk Road sale, Satoshi’s identity — None of it ultimately matters to BCH crypto punks

Table of Contents

Cryptopolitan_News

Other articles published on Oct 9, 2024

Nick Szabo, Len Sassaman, or Someone Else: Who is the Real Satoshi Nakamoto?

Supreme Court OKs U.S. Government to Sell $4.4 Billion in Seized Silk Road Bitcoin

Bitcoin Mystery Deepens as Documentary Points to Peter Todd as Satoshi

Altcoins to Watch Out Today: 3 Coins Making Big Moves Right Now

Why Now Isn’t the Time to Sell SUI: Analyst’s Bullish Analysis

SEC Settles Charges with TrueCoin and TrustToken Over Fraudulent TUSD Sales

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!