Solana

Mango

<div>
 Mango Markets, a decentralized exchange on the <a href="https://coinpaper.com/4935/solana-ecosystem-memecoins-outperform-crypto-market" target="_self" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Solana</a> blockchain, and VanEck, a leading asset manager, are both navigating crucial developments that could significantly impact their operations and the broader cryptocurrency market. While Mango Markets is facing a potential settlement with the SEC over securities law violations, VanEck continues its efforts to launch a Solana-based exchange-traded fund (ETF) despite recent regulatory challenges.&nbsp;
 <h2 id="vaneck-s-solana-etf-plans-still-in-play-despite-regulatory-filing-removal">VanEck’s Solana ETF Plans Still in Play Despite Regulatory Filing Removal</h2>
 VanEck, a prominent asset manager in the cryptocurrency space, is maintaining its commitment to launching a Solana (SOL) exchange-traded fund (ETF), despite recent uncertainties surrounding the regulatory process. The development comes after Cboe Global Markets, a major exchange operator, removed its regulatory filing that proposed listing the Solana ETF on its exchange. This move raised questions within the industry, prompting VanEck to clarify its position.
 On Aug. 9, keen observers noticed that Cboe's 19b-4 filing related to the VanEck Solana ETF was no longer visible on the exchange's website. The 19b-4 filing, a standard procedure where exchanges like Cboe and Nasdaq seek approval from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to list new ETFs, is crucial for the advancement of such funds. This sudden removal led to speculation that the Solana ETF might be in jeopardy.
 However, Matthew Sigel, VanEck's head of digital assets research, quickly addressed the concerns through a post on X. Sigel emphasized that the removal of the 19b-4 filing does not mean the end of VanEck's Solana ETF ambitions. He explained that while exchanges handle the 19b-4 filings, the responsibility for the ETF’s prospectus—known as the S-1 filing—rests with the issuer, in this case, VanEck.
 “Some have noticed that the 19b-4 for the VanEck Solana ETF has been removed from the Cboe website,” Sigel stated. “Remember that Exchanges like Nasdaq &amp;amp; Cboe file rule changes (19b-4) to list new ETFs. Issuers like VanEck are responsible for the prospectus (S-1). Ours remains in play.”
 <h3 id="the-road-to-approval">The Road to Approval</h3>
 The journey to launch a Solana <a href="https://coinpaper.com/4754/analyst-says-new-filings-set-solana-etf-deadline-for-mid-march-2025" target="_self" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">ETF</a> has been closely watched by market participants, especially following the successful listing of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) ETFs earlier this year. VanEck, alongside 21Shares, had their respective Solana ETF proposals <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/cboe-files-sec-approval-list-solana-etfs-starts-clock-required-decision-2024-07-08/" target="_self" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">submitted</a> to the SEC by Cboe in July, with a final decision expected by March 2024.
 The SEC’s approval process for crypto-based ETFs has been marked by caution, with regulators scrutinizing each proposal's structure and compliance with existing laws. Bitcoin and Ether ETFs, which launched using a grantor trust fund structure, have set a precedent that could influence the approval of future crypto ETFs, including those focused on Solana.
 In the context of these developments, VanEck’s decision to push forward with the Solana ETF demonstrates its confidence in the asset’s potential. Sigel pointed out that VanEck views Solana as a commodity, drawing parallels with Bitcoin and Ether. This perspective is based on evolving legal interpretations, where crypto assets, though potentially classified as securities in primary markets, are increasingly being treated as commodities in secondary markets.
 The removal of the 19b-4 filing sparked discussions across the crypto community, with industry experts weighing in on the situation. Summers, co-founder of the intelligence network Synoptic, raised questions about whether the removal indicated a withdrawal of the 19b-4 filings.&nbsp;
 Despite these challenges, VanEck remains resolute. Sigel reaffirmed the company’s commitment to advocating for the Solana ETF alongside its exchange partners. He emphasized that the firm is actively engaging with regulators to ensure that the proposed ETF aligns with legal and market requirements.
 The potential launch of a Solana ETF represents a significant milestone for both VanEck and the broader cryptocurrency market. While Solana’s market capitalization is dwarfed by that of Bitcoin and Ether, its unique blockchain technology and growing ecosystem have attracted significant attention from investors and developers alike.
 The success of a Solana ETF would not only provide investors with new opportunities to gain exposure to this promising asset but also signal the SEC’s willingness to broaden the scope of cryptocurrency ETFs beyond the established giants like Bitcoin and Ether.
 While the removal of the Cboe filing has introduced some uncertainty, VanEck’s unwavering commitment suggests that the Solana ETF is far from being shelved. As the regulatory process unfolds, market participants will be closely monitoring developments, with the potential launch of a Solana ETF poised to have a lasting impact on the cryptocurrency landscape.
 <h2 id="mango-markets-faces-uncertain-future-amid-sec-settlement-proposal">Mango Markets Faces Uncertain Future Amid SEC Settlement Proposal</h2>
 In related news, Mango Markets, once a dominant force in Solana's decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem, is now on the brink of a significant transformation as it prepares to settle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over allegations of securities law violations. The decentralized exchange (DEX), which was severely impacted by a $110 million exploit orchestrated by Avraham Eisenberg, a convicted fraudster, is now facing a critical moment that could determine its future in the cryptocurrency landscape.
 On Monday, Mango DAO, the governing entity that oversees Mango Markets, initiated <a href="https://dao-beta.mango.markets/dao/MNGO/proposal/9Ex2wAACZ928p5kMHUQcgruivFvKXZRichiuDy9iVgsL" target="_self" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">voting</a> on a ”SEC settlement offer proposal.” This proposal includes several significant actions that would fundamentally alter the structure and operations of Mango Markets. Among the key points in the proposal are the payment of hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines, the destruction of the DAO’s holdings of its native MNGO tokens, and the delisting of these tokens from other trading venues.
 While the SEC has not yet accepted the proposal, the vote has already garnered enough support to likely pass within the Mango DAO community. If the SEC agrees to the terms, Mango Markets' future could be cast into doubt, especially given the importance of the MNGO token to the platform's governance and operations.
 The MNGO token has been a central component of Mango Markets' governance model. Investors holding MNGO tokens have traditionally used them to vote on a range of critical decisions, including token listings, buybacks, debt repayments, and even responses to regulatory actions such as the current SEC settlement proposal. The potential destruction of these tokens would leave the DAO and the platform in a precarious position, raising questions about how day-to-day operations and governance decisions would be managed moving forward.
 The obsolescence of the MNGO token could cripple Mango Markets' ability to function as a decentralized entity, undermining the very principles upon which it was built. The loss of this governance mechanism could also impact investor confidence and the platform's ability to attract new users or retain existing ones.
 <h3 id="the-aftermath-of-the-eisenberg-exploit">The Aftermath of the Eisenberg Exploit</h3>
 Mango Markets has been struggling to recover from the fallout of Avraham Eisenberg's exploit in October 2022, which drained the protocol of $110 million. Eisenberg's ”highly profitable trading strategy,” as he described it, led to a groundbreaking criminal fraud and manipulation trial, marking a significant moment in the history of decentralized finance.
 The exploit not only resulted in substantial financial losses for Mango Markets but also exposed vulnerabilities within the platform's design and governance structure. In the aftermath, Mango Markets has faced a series of challenges, including regulatory scrutiny from multiple U.S. agencies.
 The proposed settlement with the SEC is just one facet of the regulatory challenges facing Mango Markets. The platform is also under investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). While Monday's proposal specifically addresses the SEC's allegations, the broader regulatory landscape remains uncertain.
 According to the proposal, the SEC's investigation centers on allegations that Mango DAO sold an unregistered security through the MNGO token. Additionally, Mango Labs, the developer behind Mango Markets, is facing charges of operating as an unlicensed broker. A related entity, Blockworks Foundation, is also under scrutiny for similar regulatory violations.
 The proposed settlement with the SEC would see Mango DAO neither admit nor deny the allegations. Instead, the DAO would agree to pay a fine of $223,228. Despite this relatively modest penalty, the impact on Mango Markets could be far-reaching, particularly if the SEC’s concerns lead to further regulatory actions or if the DOJ and CFTC investigations result in additional penalties or restrictions.
 Mango Markets' current treasury holds nearly $2 million in USDC and other assets, though the practical value of these holdings in the context of the settlement and ongoing operations is unclear. As the platform navigates these regulatory challenges, the broader DeFi community will be closely watching to see how Mango Markets adapts—or if it can survive at all.
 During Solana’s 2021 summer bull run, <a href="https://coinpaper.com/1065/mango-markets-exploiter-asks-court-to-let-him-keep-disputed-funds" target="_self" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Mango Markets</a> made headlines by selling $70 million worth of MNGO tokens to the public. At the time, the sale was closed to U.S. investors, likely in an effort to avoid the very regulatory scrutiny that has now come to bear on the platform. As the SEC, DOJ, and CFTC continue to investigate, the decisions made in the coming weeks could determine whether Mango Markets can find a path forward or whether it will serve as a cautionary tale in the DeFi space.
</div>

VanEck Pushes Forward with Solana ETF Amid Regulatory Hurdles

Table of Contents

Coinpaper.com

Other articles published on Aug 20, 2024

US regulators are set to redefine "money" to include cryptocurrencies

XRP to $22? Analyst Says Get Ready XRP Army, Price Aiming for the Moon

David Hirsch Moves to McGuireWoods, Strengthening it Legal Bench

China Recognizes "Virtual Asset" Transactions in New AML Law Interpretation Amid Crypto Unban Rumors

WazirX vs. Liminal Custody: The Epic Clash Over a Rs 2000 Crore Cyberattack

Cardano Price Eyes 25% Rally As Binance Pay Adds ADA

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!