Bitcoin

Coin

While industry advocates have welcomed the finalized crypto tax measures after years of wrangling, messy deliberations about non-custodial providers still lie ahead.
It’s been a long time consuming, but the <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/irs/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Internal Revenue Service</a> and the <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/treasury/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Treasury Department</a> have finally agreed upon new <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/cryptocurrency/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">crypto</a> <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/taxes/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">tax</a> reporting rules for investors.
At first, you may assume that these new guidelines would send shivers down the spine of <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/exchange/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">exchanges</a> and customers alike.
But given there’s long been exasperation over a lack of clarity in the space, the policy — which attracted a whopping 44,000 comments during a consultation — has been pretty well-received.
Why, you may ask? Because there are now clearer rules of the road to follow… and there are arguably benefits for everyone concerned.
Trading platforms will now be tasked with reporting the gains and losses of their customers, with measures gradually coming into force over the next three years.
It’s hoped this will help taxpayers — who have long had the responsibility of reporting the profits made from crypto investments — to file accurate returns with less fuss.
Meanwhile, it could also deliver a chunky windfall to the IRS, with some estimates suggesting it could boost tax income by $28 billion in the space of a decade.
Are there any losers? Yes… those who have been failing to declare their gains for the past few years on the erroneous assumption their crypto trades can’t be traced.
The IRS said it had sought to “close the tax gap related to digital assets” while ensuring the toughened rules could be implemented practically by the crypto sector.
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
 “These regulations are an important part of the larger effort on high-income individual tax compliance. We need to make sure digital assets are not used to hide taxable income, and these final regulations will improve detection of noncompliance in the high-risk space of digital assets.” <cite>IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel</cite>
</blockquote>
Officials went on to make clear that there is more work to be done here. A glaring omission from these new guidelines are <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/decentralized/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">decentralized</a> brokers — in other words, platforms that don’t end up taking custody of coins on behalf of users.
The IRS and the Treasury went on to admit that they need “more time to consider the nuances” of such transactions — but in any case, most taxpayers use centralized brokers anyway.
You might also like: <a href="https://crypto.news/these-countries-have-bitcoin-worth-billions-and-are-selling-up/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"> How much Bitcoin does the U.S. have? </a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-a-game-changer-strong">‘A game-changer’</h2>
In a statement sent to crypto.news, TaxBit’s VP of tax, Erin Fennimore, said the newly inked rules “mark an important step for digital assets in the U.S.”
Arguing they bring “much-needed clarity and legitimacy to a rapidly growing financial market,” she added:
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
 “[This] is a game-changer for the industry. This newfound regulatory certainty empowers enterprises and traditional financial institutions to navigate the digital asset sector with confidence.” <cite>Erin Fennimore</cite>
</blockquote>
She went on to argue that this could make digital assets “a more accessible investment option” for individuals and enterprises alike — building on the momentum of exchange-traded funds based on <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/bitcoin/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Bitcoin’s</a> spot price, with rumors that <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/ether/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Ether</a> could follow suit soon.
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
 “These updates offer enterprises, specifically custodial exchanges, the guidance needed for proper compliance, further solidifying crypto’s position within the broader financial ecosystem.” <cite>Erin Fennimore</cite>
</blockquote>
She went on to call for businesses in the crypto space to “streamline compliance internally” — ensuring that reports aren’t doubled up and cut the chance that customers will end up falling afoul of the taxman.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-a-messy-fight-strong">A messy fight</h2>
Coin Center also welcomed the finalized reporting rules, but argued that a hell of a lot of time has been wasted in getting to this point.
A particular sticking point concerned who should be defined as a “broker” in the crypto space, with the nonprofit arguing for more than six years that it should only apply to centralized exchanges like <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/coinbase/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Coinbase</a> and <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/kraken/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Kraken</a>.
That has finally happened now — but the IRS and the Treasury might have foregone a lot of tax revenue as they wrangled with Congress.
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
 “By now we could have verifiable records of taxpayer gains from centralized exchanges for half a decade. We don’t.” <cite>Coin Center</cite>
</blockquote>
The group went on to order that, if the definition of a broker had remained “vague and unreasonable,” everyone from miners and validators to software developers would have ended up in a position where they might have had to surveil fellow crypto users and report private transactions — or face criminal punishment. Warning this could have amounted to a constitutional violation, they added:
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
 “Had it been adopted, the broker definition would have made the US non-competitive in the field of open blockchain technologies.” <cite>Coin Center</cite>
</blockquote>
Unfortunately, the question of what should happen with non-custodial entities remains unanswered. What lies ahead could get messy.
You might also like: <a href="https://crypto.news/can-trumps-return-to-power-and-pro-crypto-policies-spark-a-historic-bull-run/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"> Can the crypto sector trust Trump? </a>

IRS unveils new crypto tax rules: Are they a good thing?

Table of Contents

crypto.news

Other articles published on Jul 4, 2024

FRIEND Down 22% In The Last 24 Hours As It Says It’ll Stay On Base L2

Critical Security Breach on Bittensor: $8M in TAO Stolen, Network Enters Safe Mode

Retirement Portfolio Boosters: 5 Altcoins to Watch in 2024

Cryptology Launches New Crypto Card for Easy Everyday Spending

Ethereum restaking protocol Symbiotic crosses $1 billion TVL in a month

MoonBag Listing On LBank Confirmed! A Move To Soar Global Visibility As MBAG Holders Gear Up For ...

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!