Solana

Dragonfly Capital’s Haseeb Qureshi raised concerns about theories of recent listings on Binance, hinting at complexities behind market fluctuations. 
The drop in prices of tokens listed on <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/binance/" target="_blank" rel="">Binance</a> over the past six months might not be the result of venture capital dumping, but rather a more nuanced interplay of market dynamics, suggests Dragonfly Capital managing partner Haseeb Qureshi. 
In <a href="https://x.com/hosseeb/status/1792257063399403669" target="_blank" rel="">an X article</a> published on May 19, Qureshi raised concerns over data published by @tradetheflow_, who found that recent Binance listings, dubbed “high FDV, low float” tokens, have experienced significant declines despite initial optimism. 
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter">
 <div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper"> 
 <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
 Looking at all the new listing of the past 6 months on the largest CEX, Binance, we note that &gt;80% of tokens are down from their listing date. The only exceptions are: – <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%24MEME&amp;src=ctag&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="">$MEME</a>: A meme coin – <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%24ORDI&amp;src=ctag&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="">$ORDI</a> : No tier 1 VC – <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%24JUP&amp;src=ctag&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="">$JUP</a> + <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%24JTO&amp;src=ctag&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="">$JTO</a>: Big Solana momentum – <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%24WIF&amp;src=ctag&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="">$WIF</a>: Another meme coin <a href="https://t.co/Y8VQV6jt6T" target="_blank" rel="">pic.twitter.com/Y8VQV6jt6T</a>— flow (@tradetheflow_) <a href="https://twitter.com/tradetheflow_/status/1791382917731762611?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="">May 17, 2024</a>
 </blockquote>
 <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> 
 </div>
</figure> 
These tokens, boasting large fully diluted valuations but minimal circulating supply upon listing, have prompted theories regarding market manipulation. 
Among the prevailing theories are concerns about venture capital (VC) and Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) dumping tokens on retail investors, a shift of retail interest towards <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/memecoin/" target="_blank" rel="">memecoins</a>, and challenges related to inadequate supply for meaningful price discovery. 
However, Qureshi disputes these claims, stating that “every top-tier VC that comes to your mind has at least a 1-year cliff and a multiyear vest before they get their tokens.” 
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"> 
 “So here’s why this story doesn’t make sense: every single one of these tokens are less than a year from TGE, meaning VCs with 1-year cliffs are still locked!” 
 Haseeb Qureshi 
</blockquote> 
 You might also like: <a href="https://crypto.news/binance-tightens-token-listing/" rel=""> Binance to tighten token listing process, jeopardizing profitability </a> 
Qureshi, who clarified that his views do not represent Dragonfly Capital as the firm’s staff has varied opinions, suggested an alternative explanation. He noted that the stability of these tokens persisted until mid-April, when a broader market downturn occurred, partly due to <a href="https://crypto.news/bitcoin-plunges-over-8-percent-heels-iran-drone-attack/" target="_blank" rel="">geopolitical tensions</a> in the Middle East. 
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"> 
 “So what is the best explanation of why these coins are still down? My explanation: these new projects have all been mentally basketed as ‘risky new coins.’ Appetite for the ‘risky new coins basket’ went down in April, and didn’t recover. The market decided they didn’t want to buy them back.” 
 Haseeb Qureshi 
</blockquote> 
He also addressed theories about retail traders selling their tokens to invest in memecoins, describing these theories as unfounded, “memecoin mania was a full on frenzy by March, but the basket dumped in April, a month and a half later.” 
In an X post on May 17, a crypto researcher at SwissBorg under the alias @tradetheflow_ <a href="https://x.com/tradetheflow_/status/1791382917731762611" target="_blank" rel="">revealed</a> that 80% of tokens listed on Binance over the past six months have lost value since their listing. The analyst noted that most of these tokens, which experienced declines, were backed by major venture capital firms such as Coinbase Ventures, Pantera Capital, Paradigm, and Dragonfly. 
Only two memecoins and one token not backed by any major VC firm managed to show positive returns since their listing, the researcher added, underscoring the need for more transparent and robust mechanisms in token listings. 
 Read more: <a href="https://crypto.news/binance-extends-cliff-period-for-token-listings-to-bolster-regulatory-compliance/" rel=""> Binance extends cliff period for token listings to bolster regulatory compliance </a>

Dragonfly Capital managing partner challenges VC token dumping theories

crypto.news

Other articles published on May 20, 2024

ETFs buy 3X new BTC supply — 5 Things to know in Bitcoin this week

Binance Backs BounceBit’s CeDeFi Launch

Another Chinese money laundering scheme tied to Deltec and Tether

Australian Man Pleads Guilty to Promoting BitConnect

Shiba Shootout Presale is Heating Up: Crypto Showdown Set to Begin Soon

Bitcoin Shows Resilience Despite Small Investors Liquidating Tokens

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!