Bitcoin ETF

Status

The post <a href="https://coinpedia.org/news/ripples-chief-legal-officer-demands-clarification-on-approval-status-of-fake-bitcoin-etf-within-4-days/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer Demands Clarification on Approval Status of Fake Bitcoin ETF Within 4 Days</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinpedia.org" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Coinpedia Fintech News</a>
The SEC’s official X account announced the approval highly anticipated spot Bitcoin ETF, only to later claim a security breach.&nbsp;
Chairman Gary Gensler clarified the misinformation, attributing it to an unauthorized user’s actions. The tweet was promptly removed, but the repercussions linger.
Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, responded swiftly corresponding in its tweet a deadline and reminding the SEC of its own rules.
Stuart Alderoty, Ripple CLO, in adherence to SEC rules, demanded accountability within four days. He underscored the urgency of understanding the breach’s scope and its implications for the market. This move reflects Ripple’s commitment to transparency and adherence to regulatory standards.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-sec-s-cybersecurity-under-scrutiny">SEC’s Cybersecurity Under Scrutiny</h2>
The incident has brought the SEC’s recently adopted cybersecurity rules into the spotlight.&nbsp;
The tweet from X’s handle named ‘Safety’ <a href="https://x.com/Safety/status/1744924042681897343?s=20" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">confirms </a>that the account @SECGov was compromised, and a preliminary investigation has been completed which shows that the compromise was caused by an unidentified individual gaining control over a phone number associated with the SEC account through a third party.&nbsp;
Senior ETF analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, Eric Balchunas’ <a href="https://x.com/EricBalchunas/status/1745037971894534291?s=20" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">latest tweet </a>captured attention with 4 crucial questions regarding the security breach:
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote">
 “1. Who is the “individual” responsible for the compromise?
 2. Who represents the “third party” involved in the incident?
 3. Whose phone number did the individual acquire or steal to gain control?
 4. Did the intruder compose the tweet themselves or discover it in the drafts folder?”
</blockquote>
In another post, Charles Gasparino, FBN Senior correspondent, <a href="https://x.com/CGasparino/status/1744926055113130372?s=20" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">reported </a>that despite the challenges and controversies at the SEC regarding the spot Bitcoin ETF, legal experts he consulted believe that rejecting the applications at this stage of the process would be unprecedented.&nbsp;
Gasparino anticipates that Wednesday could be a significant day for the mainstreaming of crypto, suggesting potential positive developments for the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs.
The confusion surrounding the fake ETF approval tweet has raised Ripple’s proactive stance and the demand for proper justification.&nbsp;
As the crypto space is currently in shock due to the aftermath, questions linger about the SEC’s ability to manage its communication effectively.&nbsp;

Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer Demands Clarification on Approval Status of Fake Bitcoin ETF Within 4 Days

Table of Contents

CoinPedia News

Other articles published on Jan 10, 2024

Over $240 million erased from crypto traders in 24 hours

Blockchain Association CEO Replied Over Sen. Elizabeth’s Concerns

3 Top Cryptos Under $1 To Invest In For 2024: Unveiling Hidden Gems

Is the fake Bitcoin ETF approval good for crypto?

Nethergate Brewery Introduces Innovative AIPA

ApeCoin Awaits Unlocking Event Amidst Market Changes

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!