Future

<figure> 
 <figcaption>
 Cover image via <a href="https://u.today/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">U.Today</a> 
 </figcaption> 
</figure> 
In a major development, yesterday a federal judge authorized the current management of FTX to begin selling the exchange's holdings of digital currencies, specifically XRP and&nbsp;<a href="https://u.today/no-solana-sol-wont-crash-ftxs-liquidation-isnt-what-you-think" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Solana (SOL)</a>. These cryptocurrencies have long been under scrutiny from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) due to accusations that they are unregistered securities. 
In response to the ruling,&nbsp;<a href="https://u.today/pro-ripple-lawyer-makes-sec-related-comment-about-ftxs-plans-to-sell-xrp-and-sol" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Jeremy Hogan</a>, a lawyer known for his support of&nbsp;<a href="https://u.today/xrp-and-shiba-inu-shib-charts-new-uptrend-amid-market-recovery" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">XRP</a>, took to social media to state that authorized sales of cryptocurrencies are not legally required to register with the SEC. He argues that the judge's ruling effectively defines XRP, SOL and similar assets as not being securities, at least not in this particular case. 
Former SEC official and securities law expert&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/Marc_Fagel/status/1702437918248468497?s=20" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Marc Fagel</a> gave his opinion on the matter, outlining the intricacies of the situation. He explained that FTX, not being the issuer of these tokens, likely qualifies for an exemption from SEC registration. Fagel also pointed out the potential complexity of the situation if&nbsp;<a href="https://u.today/breaking-ftx-allowed-to-sell-34-billion-worth-of-sol-xrp-eth-btc-and-other-coins" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">FTX</a> were to sell its own tokens, which could lead to a more complicated legal scenario. Questions about the exchange's own token, FTT, also led Fagel to suggest that its sale could raise more complex legal issues. 
<blockquote> 
 Future sales would be similarly exempt, so I’m not sure I follow your reasoning. The only complication comes with exchanges—is a particular token a security for purposes of requiring the exchange to be registered? That’s what the Coinbase/Binance cases may resolve.— Marc Fagel (@Marc_Fagel) <a href="https://twitter.com/Marc_Fagel/status/1702442952553857466?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">September 14, 2023</a> 
</blockquote> 
The discussion went on to whether the same exemptions would apply to future sales of these tokens on secondary markets. Fagel expressed confidence that future token sales would likely not be subject to SEC registration requirements. The expert emphasized that the main issue may be whether particular tokens qualify as securities, which could affect registration on exchanges, an issue that current cases involving major exchanges such as Coinbase and&nbsp;<a href="https://u.today/binanceus-loses-legal-risk-executives-amid-massive-exodus" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Binance</a> are designed to resolve.

SEC Expert Drops Knowledge Bomb on Pro-XRP Attorney Regarding FTX's Sales

U_Today

Other articles published on Sep 15, 2023

Fallout from New Pricing System is Only One of Unity’s Several Problems

Oracle Stock Price Prediction: Can ORCL Stock Crash Below $100?

First Solar Stock Price Forecast: Will FSLR Price Descend More?

Decentraland Price Prediction: Can MANA Show Recovery This Month?

Binance US loses head of legal and chief risk officer

Singapore’s Regulator Imposes 9-Year Ban on 3AC Founders

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!