<figure> 
 <figcaption>
 Cover image via <a href="https://u.today/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">U.Today</a> 
 </figcaption> 
</figure> 
<a href="https://twitter.com/MikeSeligEsq/status/1685668270253166592?s=20" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Mike Selig</a>, crypto and finreg lawyer and former official at the CFTC, took to Twitter to provide invaluable insights into the complexities surrounding the classification of XRP. In particular, he has illuminated the actual significance of the XRP ruling in the ongoing legal battle between <a href="https://u.today/top-ripple-execs-spark-controversial-debate-over-xrp-and-taxes" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Ripple</a> and the SEC. 
At the core of Selig's analysis lies a key distinction made by Judge Torres: XRP itself was not labeled as a security. Instead, the expert emphasizes that the court's ruling underscored that XRP, considered as computer code, shares traits with fungible commodities. However, the critical aspect is that <a href="https://u.today/xrp-price-to-target-new-all-time-high-analyst" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">XRP</a> can potentially be sold as part of a security, thereby subjecting it to securities laws under specific conditions. 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> 
 Continue to hear commentators saying Judge Torres held that XRP is a security when sold to institutions and not a security when sold to retail. This is incorrect. Judge Torres held that XRP itself is not a security, but it can be sold as part of a security. /1— Mike Selig (@MikeSeligEsq) <a href="https://twitter.com/MikeSeligEsq/status/1685668270253166592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">July 30, 2023</a> 
</blockquote> 
Selig brings into focus the well-known "Howey test," which determines whether a contract, transaction or scheme qualifies as an investment contract, thereby falling within the scope of securities laws. This regulatory void, as Selig coins it, has created ambiguity in the regulation of crypto assets, allowing some freedom for the industry but raising concerns about investor protection and market integrity. 
<h2 id="solution">Solution</h2> 
To address this gap, Selig suggests legislative action as the way forward. He advocates for empowering regulatory agencies like <a href="https://u.today/sec-wanted-coinbase-to-delist-shiba-inu-shib-cardano-ada-and-other-altcoins" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">the SEC</a> or CFTC with expanded authority to develop specialized regulations tailored to the unique characteristics of crypto assets. However, Selig points out that legislative support is vital, as the SEC's jurisdiction alone might not be enough to tackle the complexities of the evolving crypto landscape. 
Selig notes that the SEC seems to lean toward treating crypto assets as securities when targeting specific investors. This approach aims to fill the regulatory void by considering the investment contract, transaction or scheme as the security itself, rather than the underlying token. Nevertheless, he cautions that without legislative backing, the SEC's ability to effectively address the intricacies of the crypto industry could be limited.

Ripple v. SEC: Ex-CFTC Lawyer Reveals True Meaning of XRP Ruling

Table of Contents

U_Today

Other articles published on Jul 31, 2023

Hong Kong’s Largest Bank to Support Crypto with a Catch

Curve Finance exploit triggers massive MEV rewards

DOGE and SHIB Price Analysis for July 31

Are Your Funds Safe? Multiple Projects Attacked Due to Vyper Reentrancy Vulnerability with a tota...

Crypto Founder Richard Heart Sued by SEC for Unregistered Securities Sale and Fraud!

BALD Token Drops 90% After Developer Withdraws Liquidity Money

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!