Bitcoin Cash

Satoshi

Vision

Bitcoin

<ul class="list-ic vertical"> 
 <li> 1 <a>UK Judge Mellor orders Craig Wright to pay $516 thousand in advance as security.</a> </li> 
 <li> 2 <a>The Judge raised doubts about Wright’s ability to foot the bill</a> </li> 
</ul> 
In an interesting twist, England and Wales High Court Judge Mellor ordered Craig Wright, the self-proclaimed Bitcoin founder, to pay an advance of $516k for the security of the legal costs.&nbsp; 
Last year, Craig Wright, through his investment company Tulip Trading, sued <a href="https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2023/07/12/crypto-exchanges-that-provided-the-best-liquidity-in-2023/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">crypto exchanges</a> Coinbase and Kraken on the grounds of alleged infringement of his intellectual property rights associated with the name ‘Bitcoin.’ 
Wright alleged that the exchanges are damaging the brand of Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) by continuing the trading of Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH). 
The self-declared ‘Satoshi Nakamoto’ must first provide a $516k collateral as security for the defendant’s legal expenditures if the case fails to go his way. 
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-wright-s-financial-liquidity-questioned-strong">Wright’s financial liquidity questioned</h2> 
While rendering the judgment, Judge Mellor highlighted an instance in which Wright boasted of his ‘financial invisibility’ by moving assets through trusts. 
Craig wrote on his Slack channel “that at one point when he was ‘unable to keep paying lawyers, auditors and accountants’ he intentionally ‘started moving assets back into Tulip Trading and other companies.’” 
However, Justice Mellor questioned Wright’s ability to foot the legal costs, arguing that there is no evidence that Tulips Trading has sufficient liquidity to settle the legal fees. 
Judge Mellor also cited some discrepancies in Craig’s past statements concerning his financial health and that of the Tulip Trust. As such, Judge Mellor questioned whether Wright or his investment firm could bear the legal costs of this case.&nbsp; 
Mellor also noted that if Wright and Tulip fail to provide the security deposit, the court will dismiss his case in a few weeks.&nbsp; 
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-legal-setbacks-piling-up-for-wright-strong">Legal setbacks piling up for Wright</h2> 
In the wake of the Kraken-Coinbase suit loss, Mr Wright faced yet another legal loss in the appeal for a Bitcoin libel case against Peter McCormack. The court upheld the original decision that while McCormack’s comments were defamatory, Wright failed to provide evidence to back his claims and deliberately presented false evidence instead. 
As such, as passed in the original judgment, Peter McCormack must only pay a fine of 1 British pound ($1.29) as compensation.

UK Judge orders Craig Wright to pay $516k in advance

Table of Contents

Thecoinrepublic.com

Other articles published on Jul 27, 2023

'Rich Dad Poor Dad' Author Predicts USD Crash After This Crucial Coming Event

Jack Dorsey Questions Coinbase Chief’s Negligence of Lightning Network

Shido Wallet v3 featuring Non-KYC Shido Card!

House Committee Votes in Favor of Crypto and Blockchain Bills

BlackRock, Jio Joint Venture Causes Drop In Indian Stock Market

SHIB to Reach Top 5, XRP to Return to Top 3 in Next Bull Run, Expert Claims

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!