Ethereum

Sigma

Metamask

Gary

<p>The SEC has revealed a whole list of shitcoins that Binance should have registered as securities. What about Ethereum? And wash trading?</p><div class="thumbnail post-cover-image"><img src="https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/crash-altcoin-1-1024x683.png" srcset="https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/crash-altcoin-1-1024x683.png 1024w, https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/crash-altcoin-1-300x200.png 300w, https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/crash-altcoin-1-768x512.png 768w, https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/crash-altcoin-1.png 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="post-cover-image--img" alt="Binance"></div><div class="my-4"></div>



<h2 id="h-eth-spared-by-the-sec">ETH spared by the SEC?</h2>



<p>The SEC has filed a <a href="https://www.cointribune.com/la-sec-charge-binance-et-cz/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">lawsuit</a> against Binance and its US subsidiary (BAM Trading Services), which operates the Binance.US exchange.</p><div class="my-4"><div class="ads ">
    </div>
</div>



<p>Binance is accused, among other things, of offering its clients the opportunity to invest in unregistered securities with the SEC.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="592" height="786" src="https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/Capture-decran-du-2023-06-06-09-01-19.png" alt="" class="wp-image-607359" srcset="https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/Capture-decran-du-2023-06-06-09-01-19.png 592w, https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/Capture-decran-du-2023-06-06-09-01-19-226x300.png 226w" sizes="(max-width: 592px) 100vw, 592px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">“<em>We are operating as a fking unlicensed securities exchange in the USA bro.</em>” – Binance Chief Compliance Officer, 2018</figcaption></figure>



<p>Since its launch, Binance US has allowed trading of unregistered securities, including, “<em>but not limited to, BNB, BUSD, SOL, ADA, MATIC, FIL, ATOM, SAND, MANA, ALGO, AXS, and COTI.</em>”</p>



<p>The SEC didn’t dare name ETH. Its chairman, Gary Gensler, probably played it safe after recently <a href="https://www.cointribune.com/gary-gensler-bouscule-par-le-congres/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">discovering</a> that the organizations behind Ethereum have a presence in the US Congress.</p>



<p>These organizations include Consensys, the Ethereum Foundation, and the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance. But also Coinbase, which is currently raising hundreds of millions of dollars through its ETH “<em>staking</em>” offering. Not to mention crypto VC firms like Andreessen Horowitz.</p>



<p>As a reminder, ConsenSys owns the company Infura, which manages MetaMask, the Ethereum wallet. Infura <a href="https://www.cointribune.com/le-sabordage-dethereum-continue/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">made headlines</a> a few months ago due to its collection of IP addresses and Metamask wallet addresses.</p>



<p>The Enterprise Ethereum Alliance is an organization lobbying for ETH. It includes giants like <a href="https://entethalliance.org/member-directory-overview/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Accenture</a>, which has a hand in almost every CBDC project, as well as Banco Santander, JPMorgan, and Microsoft.</p>



<p>This faction has been spending a lot of money in Washington for years. Its goal is to prevent Ethereum from being classified as a “<em>security.</em>” In other words, they aim to give it the same “commodity” status as Bitcoin.</p>



<h2 id="achilles-staking">Achilles’ staking</h2>



<p>Since the famous “<em>Merge</em>” on September 15, Ethereum has changed its consensus mechanism, moving from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake. Instead of providing energy, it now “<em>only</em>” requires depositing 32 ETH to participate in the transaction validation process.</p><div class="my-4"><div class="ads ">
    </div>
</div>



<p>Few people own 32 ETH, so companies like Lido or Coinbase allow their clients to pool their ETH. This is the famous “staking” service. Kraken recently ended this service under pressure from the SEC.</p>



<p>Thus, even though ETH is not explicitly mentioned in the SEC’s complaint, staking is indeed considered subject to securities law.</p>



<p>In other words, dark clouds are gathering over Binance, and hefty fines should not be far off.</p>



<p>Binance’s customers are not mistaken and are withdrawing their funds at the highest rate since the US banking crisis in March. According to <a href="https://www.coinglass.com/Balance" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Coinglass</a>, over 13,300 BTC has been withdrawn in the past 24 hours. Over 30,000 BTC in a month. The exchange is already experiencing net outflows of over $1.5 billion, according to <a href="https://blockworks.co/news/binance-outflows-sec" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Blockwork</a>.</p>



<p>Many people have been complaining since yesterday about having to reverify their identities by submitting new documents. It’s a way to stem the bleeding…</p>



<p>According to <a href="https://defillama.com/cexs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DeFiLlama</a>, Binance’s assets still amount to $60.5 billion.</p>



<h2 id="binance-s-response">Binance’s response</h2>



<p>Binance responded in <a href="https://www.binance.com/en/blog/ecosystem/sec-complaint-aims-to-unilaterally-define-crypto-market-structure-8707489117122437402" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">this statement</a>. Far from making amends, the exchange continues to pretend not to understand the law:</p>



<p>“<em>While we take the SEC’s allegations seriously, they should not be the subject of an SEC enforcement action, let alone on an emergency basis. We intend to defend our platform vigorously. Unfortunately, the SEC’s refusal to productively engage with us is just another example of the Commission’s misguided and conscious refusal to provide much-needed clarity and guidance to the digital asset industry.</em>”</p>



<p>Binance claims to be “<em>surprised</em>” and warns that “<em>the SEC’s actions undermine America’s role as a global hub for financial innovation and leadership.</em>”</p>



<p>But is a shitcoin casino really an innovation?</p>



<p>The truth is that there is no demand for shitcoins. The SEC accuses Binance of engaging in wash trading of shitcoins. This includes through the market maker Sigma Chain, a company controlled by CZ.</p>



<p>Wash trading involves buying and selling a security with the express purpose of attracting investors by making them believe that the transaction volumes are higher than they actually are.</p>



<p>“<em>Zhao’s control over BAM Trading and Sigma Chain allowed the latter to engage in market manipulation on Binance.US. […] From June to August 2021, Sigma Chain repeatedly engaged in wash trading with 51 out of the 58 crypto-assets available on Binance.US,</em>” according to the SEC complaint.</p>



<p>If there was real demand for shitcoins, such illegal practices wouldn’t be necessary.</p>



<p>Without wash trading, there would be no shitcoin traders, and the majority of the casino’s revenue would disappear.</p>

Binance under dark clouds

Table of Contents

Cointribune EN

Other articles published on Jun 8, 2023

Gary Gensler’s SEC Move Towards Binance and Coinbase Poses Turning Point for Bitcoin

Revolutionary Mining-Finance Protocols: The Future of Cryptocurrency Mining

Google Cloud Collaborates with Cronos Accelerator Program to Sponsor AI Innovation in Web3

Lens Protocol Closes $15 Million in a Round Led by IDEO CoLab Ventures

Schroders Explores Crypto Custodian Options for Digital Asset Expansion

How SEC policy will affect Ethereum

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!