CoinMarketCap Academy explores the relationship between tokenization and Ethereum and how various scaling solutions can send the ecosystem to new heights.
Join us in showcasing the cryptocurrency revolution, one newsletter at a time. Subscribe now to get daily news and market updates right to your inbox, along with our millions of other subscribers (that’s right, millions love us!) — what are you waiting for?
Ethereum and Its Current Shortcomings
Another thing is that Ethereum is responsible for providing security and regulating data across its blockchain. Data layering, transaction approval, security maintenance… All this multitasking means that the blockchain has to face limitations in certain performance aspects.
With Ethereum being an extremely popular choice in the decentralized world, the main problem with many developers choosing it is overcrowding, which inevitably leads to higher transaction fees for customers who use it as a currency and/or investment.
Scaling Problems — and Solutions
The scaling solutions should enable the blockchain to reach better efficiency and lower the transaction fees while making sure that the performance is not harmed. The first-layer solutions normally include sidechains and off-chain layers, that are built on top of the main chain and designed to increase transaction throughput. Second-layer ones involve state channels, rollups, blockchain interoperability, sharding, and alternative cryptographic functions.
In August, if tThe Merge is not delayed again, the Ethereum blockchain is set to be united with its beacon chain and integrated with sharded chains. Thus, the process will divide the Ethereum network into multiple chains, which is expected to significantly improve throughput and transaction speed.
As a result of The Merge, the Ethereum mainnet is set to become:
- Faster. Transactions could be finalized as quickly as nanoseconds.
- Wider. A higher number of transactions per second increases the overall rate of transactions occurring on the blockchain.
- More decentralized. Decentralization and heavy security are two traits that Ethereum is best known for, and thus will remain after the update.
Tokenless vs Tokenized Scaling Solutions
While keeping ether as a native asset on its own blockchain is perfectly understandable, Polygon’s history of success demonstrates that the launch of a token economy goes together with hype and a loyal community. If a token or an incentive program is launched, it inevitably draws attention and motivates the users to take part in the process both financially and physically, for instance, by voting for network decisions or investing in its future development.
Let’s take a closer look at some tokenized and tokenless scaling solutions to understand how they can improve the Ethereum network.
Let’s see how it works with Arbitrum. As of May 2022, this rollup held $1.35 bn in total value locked (TVL), being the most popular tokenless scalable solution in the Ethereum network.
Ethereum rollups sorted by TVL. Source: DeFi Llama
In Arbitrum, full nodes that submit transactions to the layer 1 chain earn rewards in ETH. The rest of the user transaction fees are distributed to other network participants — such as validators. In case the block added by the Arbitrum user is proven to be incorrect or a challenge is proven unjustified, the responsible validator will have their stake confiscated, ensuring the participants always play fair or risk the consequences.
As for zero-knowledge rollups, or zk-rollups, these Layer 2 scalability solutions allow blockchains to validate transactions faster while also ensuring that gas fees remain minimal. The transaction speed is reached with the help of Merkle Trees: one stores all accounts, while the other all balances. This off-chain storage of data saves huge amounts of processing power and time for the blockchain.
Ether is used as a base coin by both Arbitrum and other rollups to cover the gas. The protocols are required to pay transaction fees and additional costs in order to bring the rollup out onto the mainnet. That should be mentioned as the main setback of tokenless scaling.
The Metis Layer2 is a scaling solution offering scalability combined with the security of the Ethereum blockchain and the ability to create Ethereum dApps. It uses its own token to pay transaction fees, with 30% of those being returned to protocols that work on the network. Unlike Arbitrum, Metis allows third parties to run sequencers by staking Metis to prove their honesty.
Is Tokenization Really Necessary for Ethereum?
The examples we discussed above show that both tokenized and tokenless solutions can contribute to the main goal of scaling the Ethereum blockchain. While the first ones, like Arbitrum, are focused on speeding up the transactions, Polygon, Metis, and others are also building a community and a wide range of decentralized services.
Tokenization, therefore, is not a necessity. It is, however, extremely beneficial in terms of reducing the gas costs, as the fees are normally paid in a native token, while the audience is intrigued to take part in developing a new network.