Ethereum

Future

<p style="text-align: justify">You can also read this news on BH NEWS: <a href="https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/polymarket-users-voice-concerns" data-wpel-link="internal" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Polymarket Users Voice Concerns</a><br></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Users of the decentralized platform Polymarket have raised their voices in protest after losing money on predictions regarding the approval of Ethereum Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). Despite the platform closing the prediction <a href="https://finance.coin-turk.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank" data-wpel-link="exclude">market</a> with a “Yes” outcome on May 23, user dissatisfaction persists over the approval process for the funds, which was not thoroughly clarified.</p>
<h2 id="what-sparked-the-user-revolt">What Sparked the User Revolt?</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify">The market concluded positively after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) gave preliminary approval to multiple Ethereum ETF applications through 19b-4 forms. While some users quickly objected to this outcome, the final decision remained unchanged. However, “No” voters argue that a 19b-4 form alone is insufficient, as an S-1 form must also be approved before ETFs can commence trading.</p>
<h2 id="is-the-approval-process-clear">Is the Approval Process Clear?</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify">Prominent user JustKen, who changed his name to RevengeTour19B4, highlighted comments from VanEck’s Matthew Sigel, who asserted that both ETF and S-1 approvals are necessary for a valid result. The SEC’s prolonged approval of S-1 forms could mean that the “Yes” outcome was prematurely declared. This opinion was bolstered by Bitwise’s Matt Hougan, who described the dual approval process as a “nuclear key scenario” during a podcast interview.</p>
<h2 id="user-insights-and-action-points">User Insights and Action Points</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify"><strong>Key Takeaways for Users:</strong></p>
<ul>
 <li>Understand the necessity of both 19b-4 and S-1 form approvals for ETF trading.</li>
 <li>Investigate the SEC’s timeline and requirements for ETF approvals to inform <a href="https://newslinker.co/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="exclude">future predictions</a>.</li>
 <li>Consider engaging in forums like those provided by UMA for clarification on prediction markets.</li>
</ul>
<h2 id="outcome-and-future-considerations">Outcome and Future Considerations</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify">Some winning predictors argue that the market only required SEC acknowledgment by May 31, not the initiation of trading. They claim that 19b-4 approvals generally precede S-1 approvals. Despite the ongoing debate, neither Risk Labs, the company behind UMA, nor Adventure One QSS Inc., responsible for Polymarket development, have commented on the situation.</p>
<h5><span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:16px">The post first appeared on BH NEWS: </span> <a href="https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/polymarket-users-voice-concerns" data-wpel-link="internal" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Polymarket Users Voice Concerns</a></h5>

Polymarket Users Voice Concerns

目錄

BH NEWS

在 2024年5月24日發表的其他文章

CAC registration is an attack on financial inclusion and our jobs – POS operators

Ripple taking ‘cheap shots’ at Tether, says Samson Mow

Ether ETF Launch Threatens to End Bitcoin’s 18-Month Rising Reign

BlockDAG’s Dashboard Update & $30.5M Presale Overshadow Chainlink (LINK) Price & Fetch.ai Innovat...

Iconic Dogecoin Mascot And Meme Legend Kabosu, A Shiba Inu Dog, Passes Away In Japan

Analyst Bets on ADA & AVAX After SEC’s Ethereum ETF Approval

訂閱免費電子報，每天收取加密貨幣最新動態！