Future

Lens

Friend(.)Tech, a Web3 social network known for allowing users to trade tokens for access to influential individuals' feeds, faced a major setback.&nbsp;
On September 8, the platform's developers&nbsp;<a style="text-decoration:none" href="https://x.com/friendtech/status/1832581118165709140">executed</a> a function that transferred ownership of its smart contracts to Ethereum’s null address.&nbsp;
<div>
 <blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
 Admin and ownership parameters have been set to 0x000...000 to prevent any changes to their fees or functionality in the future. This change does not affect the separate web client operated at <a href="https://t.co/YOHabcBL3H">https://t.co/YOHabcBL3H</a> which will continue to function as is. No fees from either…— friend.tech (@friendtech) <a href="https://twitter.com/friendtech/status/1832581118165709140?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 8, 2024</a>
 </blockquote> 
</div>
This action effectively locks the system in place, reportedly halting any future development or changes.
<h2 dir="ltr" id="span-span-the-revocation-of-control-span-span">The Revocation of Control</h2>
Friend(.)Tech’s decision to revoke ownership of its smart contracts has generated significant confusion and concern within the community. The developers’ move ensures that no further modifications can be made to the platform’s fees or functionality.
&nbsp;
According to an announcement on X (formerly Twitter), no fees from either the smart contracts or the website will be directed to the Friend(.)Tech development team’s multisig wallet. This step was taken to “prevent any changes to their fees or functionality in the future.”
&nbsp;
The revocation means that while the web client at Friend(.)Tech will continue to operate as usual, the implementation of new features or updates is highly unlikely. The smart contracts are now locked, making any future adjustments to the system impossible.
<h2 dir="ltr" id="span-span-platform-performance-and-market-reaction-span-span">Platform Performance and Market Reaction</h2>
Friend(.)Tech, built on Ethereum’s layer-2 Base, initially garnered significant attention for its innovative approach to monetizing content through tokenized shares or “keys.” However, despite its early success, the platform struggled with various issues.&nbsp;
&nbsp;
User dissatisfaction increased following problems with the&nbsp;<a style="text-decoration:none" href="https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/friendtech-friend-token-falls-after-community-airdrop/">FRIEND airdrop</a> in May, and daily fees earned from the protocol have dropped below $1,000 since late July. Trading volume has also seen a substantial decline.
&nbsp;
The platform’s token, FRIEND, has experienced a dramatic decrease in value. It has fallen nearly 52% to $0.067 in the past 24 hours.&nbsp;
&nbsp;
The token’s market cap, which reached $233.6 million within the first four days of its launch, has <a href="https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/friend-tech/">plummeted to $909k</a>. Additionally, the total value locked (TVL) on Friend(.)Tech has decreased from an all-time high of $52 million in early October 2023 to less than $3.5 million, according to&nbsp;<a style="text-decoration:none" href="https://defillama.com/protocol/friend.tech#information">DefiLlama</a>.
<h2 dir="ltr" id="span-span-confusion-over-future-developments-span-span">Confusion Over Future Developments</h2>
Friend(.)Tech had previously announced plans to develop its own blockchain, “Friendchain,” adding another layer of uncertainty about its future. However, this announcement was later deleted from the platform’s X account, further compounding the confusion.
&nbsp;
The revocation of control comes amid a broader trend of declining user engagement on decentralized social media platforms.&nbsp;
&nbsp;
Friend(.)Tech, along with other platforms like Farcaster and Lens Protocol, once promised to revolutionize social interactions through blockchain technology. Yet, user interest in these platforms has sharply declined in recent months.
<h2 dir="ltr" id="span-span-the-broader-context-span-span">The Broader Context</h2>
Farcaster, founded by Coinbase alumni Dan Romero and Varun Srinivasan, was designed to be a censorship-resistant and privacy-focused social network. Despite securing&nbsp;<a style="text-decoration:none" href="https://danromero.org/farcaster-update/">$150 million</a> in May 2024, its user base has dwindled.&nbsp;
&nbsp;
Registrations fell from over 15,000 in February to just 545 by September. Daily active users (DAUs) also dropped from approximately 104,000 in early July to 60,000.
&nbsp;
Similarly, Lens Protocol has seen a steep drop in user engagement. New user registrations fell from over 37,000 in February to just 142 by September, and DAUs decreased from a high of 42,281 in July to 8,368.
&nbsp;
Many blockchain enthusiasts argue that the issue lies in the platforms' approach. They suggest that these decentralized social media platforms replicate existing Web2 functionalities without offering significant improvements in user experience or interface.
&nbsp;
As one X user&nbsp;<a style="text-decoration:none" href="https://x.com/Mayday117/status/1832986944508408236">noted</a>:
&nbsp;
“The problem with Farcaster is that it’s trying to build what is already there but on blockchain without any UX/UI innovations. The first successful decentralized social app will be one of the current Web2 market leaders after they integrate blockchain technologies.”

Friend.Tech Faces Uncertain Future After Transferring Control of Smart Contracts

Table of Contents

BSCN

Other articles published on Sep 14, 2024

Top Memecoins POPCAT, MOG and TURBO Lead The Rally; What's Ahead?

Solana Developers Gain Access to World ID with Wormhole Integration

Bitcoin Shoots Past $60K for the First Time in 2 Weeks, Liquidating Over $100M in Shorts

Crypto Millionaire, James Fickel, Faces $43M Loss as Ether Bet Leads to $132M Debt Spiral

2024’s Top Cryptos for Massive Returns

DeFi needs more interoperability, not apps or infra | Opinion

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!