Read more about this below.
Cracking the Code: The S-1 Form and Its Shortcomings
Crypto’s Regulatory “Catch-22”
Uyeda questioned why the same tailored approach isn’t applied to digital asset securities, arguing that the SEC has the flexibility to create such changes. He expressed frustration over the agency’s failure to provide more supportive frameworks for digital asset sponsors, which often leaves them in a regulatory “catch-22.” This situation arises when the SEC requires disclosures that may not be relevant to digital assets, or when sponsors are unable to comply due to the unique nature of their products.
And it Goes On…
Crypto Reaction
Ripple, along with other companies like Coinbase, has argued that the SEC has not provided clear regulatory guidelines for digital assets. Uyeda’s comments reflect his dissent from the SEC’s decision to deny Coinbase’s rulemaking petition, which sought clarification on what constitutes security in the digital asset space.
Uyeda hopes that either current SEC Chairman Gary Gensler or his successors will recognize the growing regulatory uncertainty around digital assets and take steps toward developing clear legislation or rulemaking. However, digital assets have not been a priority on the SEC’s regulatory agenda under Gensler, who has the final say on which items are included.
Uyeda’s Stand on Regulations
Looking ahead, Uyeda suggested that the SEC should consider the regulatory approaches of other jurisdictions, including the EU, South Korea, and Japan when shaping future rules for digital assets. While his term as one of the SEC’s five commissioners extends until June 2028, Uyeda made it clear that his views are personal and do not necessarily represent the stance of the entire agency.
Also Discover How the laws & regulations affecting blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies, like Bitcoin, can impact its adoption.
A Countdown to Change Begins, Will the SEC Step Up or Fall Behind? We Wait and Watch!