Stone

Spotify’s content moderation has come under scrutiny as the streaming giant appears to be recommending AI-generated music to consumers. The platform has pinned the “Verified Artist” badge to allegedly non-existent artists whose deepfake music has run into hundreds of thousands of plays. 
Ed Newton-Rex, CEO of Fairly Trained and former VP of audio at <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/ai-ceo-emad-mostaque-resigns-amidst-turmoil/">Stability AI,</a> complained that the loophole threatens the streamshare of human artists. “It’s clear this is going to eat into the royalties and the revenue streams paid to real human musicians,” he said, as <a href="https://www.fastcompany.com/91170296/spotify-ai-music" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">reported</a> by Fast Company. 
<h3 id="spotify-urged-to-ban-ai-music-used-without-consent">Spotify urged to ban AI music used without consent</h3> 
While Spotify <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-66882414" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">does not outlaw</a> AI-generated content, the Fairly Trained CEO views it as a double-barreled prejudice against human artists. AI applications used to produce music are exploiting the work of human artists without compensating them. 
“Spotify just straight up shouldn’t allow music on the platform that is using models where there’s serious concern that they are trained on other musicians’ work without permission,” said Newton-Rex whose non-profit accredits AI companies for fair data sourcing. 
For AI music that is allowed, the ethicist argues: 
<blockquote>
 “They [Spotify] should label it so that people can make a choice as to whether they listen to it. . . . And I think Spotify probably shouldn’t be recommending it.”
</blockquote> 
One red flag concerning AI artists is the lack of online or media presence outside Spotify. An alleged <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Music/comments/164onvu/comment/kvetjgg/?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=web3x&amp;utm_name=web3xcss&amp;utm_term=1&amp;utm_content=share_button" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">example</a> of the fakes, Jet Fuel &amp; Ginger Ales, has a verified badge and has amassed<a href="https://open.spotify.com/artist/1dPgPwYz4zapkdMwTIxq7y" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"> 414,500</a> monthly listeners. 
Other examples include bands like <a href="https://open.spotify.com/artist/6a9sa1cMkU55p7QGbjSzNu" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Awake Past 3</a>, <a href="https://open.spotify.com/artist/5OwtTivjNpwddFWRKjOoyz?si=SXUdKh0YTy-pOSB1_ZkJ-w" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Gutter Grinders</a> and supposed “Citrus Reticulata” labelmates Sofia Pitcher, Jefferson Petersen, Zolia Zayas, Alvaro Cantu, Isabella Carpinelli, Diego Tobia, Craig Penry and Saul Deleon. 
The allegedly non-existent Sofia Pitcher reached 3, 000 monthly listeners between December 2023 and March 2024. Her <a href="https://www.eldiario.es/cultura/musica/misteriosa-desaparicion-sofia-pitcher-spotify_1_10981184.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">disappearance</a> was likely the outcome of a vigilance operation by Spotify. 
Pitcher’s removed album, Stone Age, consisted of ten instrumental songs whose runtime never went past a minute and a half. While seemingly conceptual, her song titles “Rock”, “Cave”, “Hunter”, and “Clan” may have been simple enough to err on the safe side of streamers’ attention span. 
<figure id="attachment_499760" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-499760" style="width: 100%" class="wp-caption aligncenter">
 <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-499760 size-full" src="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Default_New_Tennessee_AI_Legislation_Protects_Musicians_Rights_0.jpg" alt="Spotify " width="1024" height="768" srcset="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Default_New_Tennessee_AI_Legislation_Protects_Musicians_Rights_0.jpg 1024w, https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Default_New_Tennessee_AI_Legislation_Protects_Musicians_Rights_0-300x225.jpg 300w, https://www.cryptopolitan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Default_New_Tennessee_AI_Legislation_Protects_Musicians_Rights_0-768x576.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px">
 <figcaption id="caption-attachment-499760" class="wp-caption-text">
 Spotify has been criticized for recommending AI music
 </figcaption>
</figure> 
<h3 id="ai-is-seen-as-a-way-to-make-a-fast-buck">AI is seen as a way to ‘make a fast buck’</h3> 
As reported by Fast Company, streaming expert Enric Calabuig said that fake Spotify labels may be involved in stream farming – a practice where premium accounts spread across hundreds of mobile terminals generate automated replays. 
Playlist Alert founder, Kieron Donoghue, considers the upsurge of AI songs innocuous. “It’s just a case of some people trying to make a fast buck, like they’ve always done on Spotify,” he said. “I don’t see it as a threat as it stands now to anyone’s livelihoods.” 
The trend comes into focus as mainstream musicians such as Kanye West and <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/industry-confronts-unauthorized-ai-vocal/">Eminem</a> are said to be turning to artificial intelligence to produce earlier or more intense versions of their voices. 
Eminem resurrected his alter ego, Slim Shady, through Metaphysic, a company that gives artists ownership of their biometric data such as vocal or facial likeness in the age of AI.

Spotify rapped over AI music amid calls for fair pay to human artists

Table of Contents

Cryptopolitan_News

Other articles published on Aug 10, 2024

Investors Withdraw Funds from Bitcoin ETFs

Ripple President Calls US Dollar Stablecoin as Ripple Readies to Test RLUSD

Memecoin Whale Profits $5.06 Million from $PEPE, Sends All Holdings to Binance

Bitcoin’s structural bullishness grows as Ethereum loses ground

Revenue Sharing Presale Star Expected To See Meteoric Rise Trumping XRP and SOL For Gains

Crucial Bitcoin (BTC) Security Warning Issued by Samson Mow

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!