Celsius

Cryptocurrency

2024

April

when

A married couple who owned Celsius corporate accounts has filed a motion to receive a second disbursement from the bankruptcy after they and other creditors allegedly received a 35% reduction to their payment when compared with non-corporate accounts.&nbsp;
The motion was <a href="https://cases.stretto.com/public/x191/11749/PLEADINGS/1174906032480000000091.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">filed</a> on June 3, and a hearing will reportedly be held to consider it on June 27.
The motion comes after widespread complaints from corporate creditors who have alleged that the Celsius debtors delayed payments to corporate accounts and paid cash instead of crypto, causing losses to these creditors.
According to the filing, four companies, BFaller RD, BFaller ROTH RD, SFaller TRD RD and SFaller RD, collectively known as the “Faller Creditors,” are seeking an order approving further distribution under the Celsius bankruptcy plan. The four companies are Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) owned by Sheri Anne Faller and Bernard Jacob Faller, according to business records in the State of California.
<figure data-ct-non-breakable="true">
 <img src="https://s3.cointelegraph.com/uploads/2024-06/ab7094a8-cdc9-4b16-8986-225084d9fd1e.png" alt="" title="">
 <figcaption style="text-align: center;">
 Faller creditors motion for second disbursement. Source: Stretto
 </figcaption>
</figure>
These four IRAs held over $1 million worth of cryptocurrency in their Celsius accounts prior to the platform’s bankruptcy petition date, the document stated. Under the negotiated bankruptcy plan, this claim was reduced to $634,337.93 worth of Bitcoin (<a href="https://cointelegraph.com/bitcoin-price">BTC</a>) and Ether (<a href="https://cointelegraph.com/ethereum-price">ETH</a>) to be paid out on the distribution date of Jan. 16. This was approximately 7.38 BTC and 123 ETH owed to the two individuals.
However, the Celsius debtors allegedly failed to make the payments by the Jan. 16 deadline. On Jan. 19, a representative of Celsius told the two individuals that they would not be allowed to receive cryptocurrency payments since their accounts were not in the cut-off of the first 100 corporate Celsius accounts in terms of the value of their assets. Instead, the cryptocurrency would need to be converted into cash and paid out through the banking system.
The couple initially agreed to be paid the Jan. 19 cash value of the cryptocurrency held. However, debtors still did not pay them, they claim. On Feb. 13, the two creditors demanded that they be paid in crypto, “given the delay.” In response, the debtors reportedly told them again that they could not be paid in cryptocurrency since they were not in the top-100 list of corporate creditors.
The two creditors finally received a wire transfer of $414,733 on Feb. 22. However, they claim that they were not allowed to withdraw these funds until March 8. They received additional payments on April 22 totaling approximately $219,602, for a combined total of $634,335. 
The couple claims that the cash value of these payments is far less than the value of the BTC and ETH they were owed, based on prices prevailing on the date they received the payments. By their calculations, they should have received $973,955, the equivalent value of the BTC and ETH they were promised. They are, therefore, demanding an additional $338,611 plus interest payments of $11,984 for holding their cryptocurrency past the required distribution date, for a total of $350,596.
<figure data-ct-non-breakable="true">
 <img src="https://s3.cointelegraph.com/uploads/2024-06/a72a01a3-796c-4df1-90f5-68c59e7145cb.png" alt="" title="">
 <figcaption style="text-align: center;">
 Faller creditors table of distributions and shortfalls. Source: Stretto
 </figcaption>
</figure>
The Faller creditors are not the only businesses that have complained that they were treated unjustly by Celsius when compared to the top corporate accounts or individuals. In March, Cointelegraph was contacted by the director of a corporate creditor who claimed that he&nbsp;<a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/celsius-creditors-allege-compensation-reduction">received 30% less</a> than he had agreed to under the plan.
In response to that earlier claim and others like it, Celsius Estate stated that it had already sold users’ cryptocurrency on Jan. 16. Therefore, it concluded that it could not pay creditors crypto that it no longer held. In addition, the estate claimed that it was required to sell the crypto on that date, as that is what the bankruptcy plan called for.
It also claimed that corporate accounts have a “significantly more demanding” compliance and onboarding process, which prevented it from obtaining accounts for the majority of corporate creditors.
The new filing pushes back against these claims. It states that the estate failed to make reasonable efforts to supply corporate creditors with accounts: “[T]he Debtors did not use commercially reasonable efforts to make distributions as provided in Article 4, subsection K of the Plan, because they only sought to use Coinbase and PayPal as the cryptocurrency distribution agents when others were available.”
Cryptocurrency exchanges Kraken and Bitgo could have been used instead of Coinbase and PayPal, which could have handled “widespread distribution to a large group of creditors,” the document alleges. It calls the selection of Coinbase and PayPal an “arbitrary choice.” 
The document also criticizes the three-month delay between these accounts’ crypto being converted into fiat and the payments being made. “The Plan states that the Plan Administrator, when making a fiat distribution in lieu of cryptocurrency, would make the conversion ‘as close to the anticipated date of distribution as reasonably practical under the circumstances,’” it states, adding that three months is allegedly “not a reasonable period of time” to elapse after the conversion.
The Celsius estate rejected these arguments previously, claiming instead that it had made reasonable efforts to obtain corporate accounts for creditors and to pay them cash promptly if they couldn’t receive crypto.
Magazine: <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/spot-ethereum-etf-ether-price-bitcoin-patrick-scott-dynamo-defi-hall-of-flame/">Ethereum’s recent pullback could be a gift: Dynamo DeFi, X Hall of Flame</a>
According to another Celsius corporate creditor, Wesley Chang, who also claims to have suffered losses as a result of payment delays, an omnibus hearing is scheduled for June 27 at 10 am EDT (2 pm UTC), and the motion will be considered at this hearing.
Celsius, a crypto lending platform founded in 2017, stopped processing withdrawals in June 2022. As a result, an estimated $2.8 billion of customer’s cryptocurrency was <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/everything-that-s-happened-with-celsius-and-alex-mashinsky-so-far">trapped on the platform</a>. Its founder and former CEO, Alex Mashinsky, was <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/celsius-ceo-alex-mashinsky-arrested">indicted on seven counts of fraud</a> for his alleged role in the platform’s collapse. His trial is scheduled for September.
Related: <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/alex-mashinsky-trial-september-2024">Alex Mashinsky’s jury trial scheduled for September 2024</a>
After filing for bankruptcy in July 2022, Celsius <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/celsius-distribution-crypto-creditors-bitcoin-ethereum">has paid out more than $2 billion</a> of creditor claims. Most creditors have received their cryptocurrency payments “without any security or operational issues,” according to a Feb. 15 court filing from the platform’s estate.

Celsius small business creditors demand reimbursement after 35% cut in claims

Cointelegraph

Other articles published on Jun 25, 2024

BlockDAG Dev 58 Launch: Revamping Blockchain Explorer Sparks Unmatched 30,000x ROI Mania

South Korea Tightens Crypto Oversight with New User Protection Law

BlockDAG: Pioneering Layer 1 Blockchain with 30,000x Growth Potential; Solana Meme Coins Gain Tra...

Bitcoin and AAVE Investors Race To Get Their Name On Qubetics Whitelist

Why Did Bitcoin (BTC) Price Decline? What’s Happening To Bitcoin Price? Here is the Latest Liquid...

Bitcoin Price Reaches $61,000 as Fed Maintains Cautious Stance

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!